The aggregate changes in public opinion attitudes toward foreign policy issues in three West European countries during the cold war decades (1954-1990) are analyzed. The stability hypothesis is addressed from different angles to ascertain the amount of change in public opinion attitudes toward foreign policy issues in France, Germany, and Italy. Results reveal a low level of volatility in public opinion that corresponds with the findings for the American public. On the other hand, French, German, and Italian public opinion shows a somewhat higher level of fluctuation than in the United States. Attitudes toward NATO, the United States, and the Soviet Union closely reflect the evolution of world politics and therefore represent a reasonable reaction to international events and crises.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, A. Gabriel . [1950] 1960. The American people and foreign policy. New York: Praeger.
2.
Anderson, Chris , and M. Shawn Reichert. 1996. Economic benefits and support for membership in the EU: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy15:231-249.
3.
Cantril, H.1948. Trends of opinion during World War II: Some guides to interpretation. Public Opinion Quarterly12:30-44.
4.
Caspary, W. R.1970. The mood theory: A study of public opinion and foreign policy. American Political Science Review64:536-547.
5.
Cohen, C. Bernard . 1977-1978. Political systems, public opinion and foreign policy: The United States and the Netherlands. International Journal33:195-216.
6.
Cohen, C. Bernard . 1995. Democracies and foreign policy: Public participation in the United States and the Netherlands. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Dicey, Albert W.1952. Law and public opinion in England. London: Macmillan.
8.
Eichenberg, C. Richard . 1989. Public opinion and national security in Western Europe. London: Macmillan.
9.
Eichenberg. C. Richard . 1998. Domestic preferences and foreign policy: Cumulation and confirmation in the study of public opinion. Mershon International Studies Review42:97-105.
10.
Eichenberg, Richard C. , and Russell J. Dalton. 1993. Europeans and the European Community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization47 (4): 507-534.
11.
Everts, Philip . 1995. NATO, the European Community, and the United Nations. In Public opinion and internationalized governance, edited by Oskar Niedermayer and Richard Sinnott, 402-429. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Everts, Philip . 2000. Vluchtig of stabiel? Een lange-termijn-perspectief op de publieke opinie. Vrede en Veiligheid29 (4): 502-525.
13.
Flynn, H. Gregory , and Hans Rattinger, eds. 1985. The public and Atlantic defense. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
14.
Gabel, Matthew . 1998. Interests and integration: Market liberalization, public opinion and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Gabel, Matthew , and Harvey Palmer. 1995. Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research27:3-19.
16.
Graham, Thomas W.1988. The pattern and importance of public knowledge in the nuclear age. Journal of Conflict Resolution32:319-334.
17.
Holsti, R. Ole . 1992. Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann consensus. International Studies Quarterly36:439-466.
18.
Holsti, R. Ole . 1996. Public opinion and American foreign policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Humphreys, Peter J.1996. Mass media and media policy in Western Europe. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
20.
Inglehart, Ronald , J.-R. Rabier, and K. E. Reif. 1987. The evolution of public attitudes toward European integration 1970-86. Journal of European Integration10:135-155.
21.
Isernia, Pierangelo . 1996. Dove gli angeli non mettono piede. Opinione pubblica e politica di sicurezza in Italia. Milano: Angeli.
22.
Isernia, Pierangelo . 2000. Where the angels fear to tread: Italian public opinion and foreign policy. In Decisionmaking in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy, edited by Robert Y. Shapiro, Brigitte Nacos, and Pierangelo Isernia, 297-304. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
Jacobs, R. Lawrence , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1994. Studying substantive democracy. PS: Political Science and Politics27:9-17.
24.
Jentleson, B. W.1992. The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly36:49-74.
25.
La Balme, Natalie . 2001. The French and the use of force: Public perceptions and their impact on the policy-making process. In Public opinion and the international use of force, edited by Philip Everts and Pierangelo Isernia. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
26.
Lebow, Richard Ned , and Thomas Risse-Kappen, eds. 1995. International relations theory and the end of the cold war. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
Lynn-Jones, M. Sean , and Steven E. Miller, eds. 1994. The cold war and after: Prospect for peace. Expanded edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Morse, Edward . 1973. Foreign policy and interdependence in Gaullist France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Niedermayer, Oskar . 1995. Trends and contrasts. In Public opinion and internationalized governance, edited by Oskar Niedermayer and Richard Sinnott, 53-72. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
Niedermayer, Oskar , and Richard Sinnott, eds. 1995. Public opinion and internationalized governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
Page, I. Benjamin , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1982. Changes in Americans' policy preferences, 1935-1979. Public Opinion Quarterly46:24-42.
32.
Page, I. Benjamin , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Powlick, J. Philip , and Andrew Z. Katz. 1998. Defining the American public opinion/foreign policy nexus. Mershon International Studies Review42:29-62.
34.
Putnam, D. Robert . 1977. Italian foreign policy: The emergent consensus. In Italy at the polls: The parliamentary election in 1976, edited by H. R. Pennimann. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
35.
Putnam, D. Robert . 1978. Interdependence and the Italian communists. International Organization32:301-349.
36.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas . 1991. Public opinion, domestic structures and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World Politics43:479-512.
37.
Russett, Bruce , and Thomas W. Graham. 1989. Public opinion and national security policy: Relationships and impacts. In Handbook of war studies, edited by Manus I. Midlarski. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
38.
Sani, G.1980. The political culture of Italy: Continuity and change. In The civic culture revisited, edited by Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Shapiro, Y. Robert , and Lawrence R. Jacobs. 1989. The relationship between public opinion and public policy: A review. In Political behavior annual, vol. 2, edited by Samuel Long. Boulder, CO: Westview.
40.
Shapiro, Y. Robert , and Benjamin I. Page. 1988. Foreign policy and the rational public. Journal of Conflict Resolution32:211-247.
41.
Shepherd, Robert J.1975. Public opinion and European integration. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
42.
Stimson, James A.1991. Public opinion on America: Moods, cycles & swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
Zaller, John . 1994. Strategic politicians, public opinion and the Gulf War. In Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War, edited by W. Lance Bennet and David L. Paletz, 250-275. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
