Women work for peace, and men wage war—cooperative women, conflictual men. These images pervade conventional wisdom about the efficacy of women in leadership roles and decision-making environments, but imagery is not always grounded in reality. Feminist international relations literature is examined to understand how domestic gender equality may help predict a state's international crisis behavior. The authors use the record of female leaders as primary decision makers during international crises and then test the relationship between domestic gender equality and a state's use of violence internationally. The International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data set and multinomial logistic regression are used to test the level of violence exhibited during international crises by states with varying levels of domestic gender equality. Results show that the severity of violence in crisis decreases as domestic gender equality increases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Deborah , and Kristi Andersen. 1993. Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 527-545.
2.
Astin, H. S. , and C. Leland. 1991. Women of influence, women of vision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Boling, Patricia . 1991. The democratic potential of mothering. Political Theory19:606-625.
4.
Brecher, Michael , and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
Brock-Utne, Birgit . 1985. Educating for peace: A feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon.
6.
Caprioli, Mary . 2000. Gendered conflict. Journal of Peace Research37 (1): 51-68.
7.
Conover, Pamela J.1988. Feminists and the gender gap. Journal of Politics50:985-1010.
8.
Conover, Pamela Johnston , and Virginia Sapiro. 1993. Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science37 (4): 1079-1099.
9.
Cook, E. A. , and Clyde Wilcox. 1991. Feminism and the gender gap—A second look. Journal of Politics53:1111-1122.
10.
Daly, Mary . 1984. Pure lust: Elemental feminist philosophy. Boston: Beacon.
11.
de Boer, Connie . 1985. The polls: The European peace movement and deployment of nuclear missiles. Public Opinion Quarterly49 (Spring): 119-132.
12.
Dietz, Mary G.1985. Citizenship with a feminist face: The problem with maternal thinking. Political Theory13:19-35.
13.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke . 1986. The new feminist scholarship. Salmagundi71:3-26.
14.
Fite, David , Marc Genest, and Clyde Wilcox. 1990. Gender differences in foreign policy attitudes. American Political Quarterly18 (October): 492-513.
15.
Frankovic, K.1982. Sex and politics—New alignments, old issues. Political Science and Politics15 (Summer): 439-448.
16.
Fukuyama, Francis . 1998. Women and the evolution of world politics. Foreign Affairs77 (5): 24-40.
17.
Gallagher, Nancy W. 1993. The gender gap in popular attitudes toward the use of force. In Women and the use of military force, edited by Ruth H. Howes and Michael R. Stevenson, 23-37. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
18.
Gidengil, Elisabeth . 1995. Economic man-social woman?Comparative Political Studies28 (3): 384-408.
19.
Griffin, Susan . 1981. Pornography and silence. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1990. Beyond oppression: Feminist theory and political strategy. New York: Continuum.
21.
Iannello, Kathleen P. 1992. Decisions without hierarchy. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
22.
Inter-Parliamentary Union . 1995. Women in parliaments 1945-1995: A world statistical survey. Geneva, Switzerland: The Inter-Parliamentary Union.
23.
Jaggers, Keith , and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-482.
24.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. (Producers). 1996. Polity III: Regime change and political authority, 1800-1994 (Computer file, 2nd ICPSR version). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (Distributor).
25.
Jayawardena, Kumari . 1986. Feminism and nationalism in the Third World. London: Zed.
26.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin . 1992. Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of US senate candidates. Journal of Politics54 (2): 497-517.
27.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin . 1994. Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in statewide campaign. American Journal of Political Science38 (1): 162-195.
28.
Leeper, Mark S.1991. The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly19:248-261.
29.
Malhotra, I. 1989. Indira Gandhi: A personal and political biography. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
30.
McGlen, Nancy E. , and Meredith Reid Sarkees. 1993. Women in foreign policy: The insiders. New York: Routledge.
31.
Miller, A. 1988. Gender and the vote: 1984. In The politics of the gender gap, edited by C. M. Mueller, 258-282. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Mueller, John . 1973. War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
33.
Mueller, John . 1989. Retreat from doomsday: The obsolescence of major war. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Mueller, John . 1994. Policy and opinion in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Page, Benjamin I. , and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Peteet, Julie Marie . 1991. Gender in crisis: Women and the Palestinian resistance movement. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
Reis, Sally Morgan . 1998. Work left undone: Choices and compromises of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon . 1998. Determinants of collaborative leadership: Civic engagement, gender, or organizational norms. Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 847-868.
39.
Ruddick, Sara . 1989. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon.
40.
Shapiro, Robert Y. , and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly50 (Spring): 42-61.
41.
Smith, Tom W.1984. The polls: Gender and attitudes towards violence. Public Opinion Quarterly48 (Spring): 384-396.
42.
Stoessinger, J. 1990. Why nations go to war. New York: St. Martin's.
43.
Sykes, Patricia Lee . 1993. Women as national leaders: Patterns and prospects. In Women as national leaders, edited by Michael A. Genovese. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Tabachnik, Barbara G. , and Linda S. Fidell. 1996. Using multivariate statistics. 3d ed.New York: HarperCollins.
45.
Tedeschi, J. 1984. A social psychological interpretation of human aggression. In Social psychology of aggression, edited by A. Mummendy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
46.
Tessler, Mark , Jodi Nachtwey, and Audra Grant. 1999. Further tests of the women and peace hypothesis: Evidence from cross-national survey research in the Middle East. International Studies Quarterly43 (3): 519-531.
47.
Tessler, Mark , and Ina Warriner. 1997. Gender, feminism, and attitudes toward international conflict. World Politics49 (January): 250-281.
48.
Tickner, J. Ann . 1992. Gender in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
49.
Togeby, Lise . 1994. The gender gap in foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Peace Research31 (November): 375-392.
50.
Trumbore, Peter F. , and Mark A. Boyer. 2000. International crisis decision-making as a two-level process. Journal of Peace Research37 (6): 679-698.
51.
United Nations . 1984. Improving concepts and methods for statistics and indicators on the situations of women. New York: United Nations Publication.
52.
Welch, S. , and J. Hibbing. 1992. Financial conditions, gender, and voting in American national elections. Journal of Politics54:197-213.
53.
Welch, S. , and S. Thomas. 1988. Explaining the gender gap in British public opinion. Women and Politics8 (3/4): 25-44.
54.
White, Jacquelyn W. 1983. Sex and gender issues in aggression research. In Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews, edited by R. G. Geen and E. I. Donnerstein. New York: Academic Press.
55.
White, Jacquelyn W.1988. Influence tactics as a function of gender, insult, and goal. Sex Roles18 (7/8): 433-448.
56.
Wilcox, Clyde , Lara Hewitt, and Dee Allsop. 1996. The gender gap in attitudes toward the Gulf War: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Peace Research33 (1): 67-82.
57.
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan . 1991. Trigger-response transitions in foreign policy crises, 1929-1985. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:143-169.
