As prescribed by the culture of natural science, theories of social psychology are essentially intraindividual mechanisms or information-processing structures that, when activated by stimulus conditions, determine cognitive and behavioral responses. Such theories are conceived to operate independently of the sociocultural context in which people exist. We argue that without being connected to the biology of the organism, or to features of the ecology or social structure that are common to humankind, there is no a priori basis for assuming such theories to be universal. Further, for theories to be universal, the meaning of the stimulus conditions has to be constant across cultures, but since culture is the ultimate source of meaning, we cannot take meaning constancy for granted. On the other hand, cross-cultural variations in social behavior may be "surface" expressions of deep structure norms that are universal. Finally, we examine universalistic conceptual frameworks and models, which provide dimensions along which cultural comparisons can be made, to suggest and test general hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2.
Bharati, A. (1985). The self in Indian thought and action. in A. Marsella, G. DeVos, and F.L.K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and Self (pp. 185-230). London: Tavistock.
3.
Bontempo, R. , Lobel, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1987). Compliance and value internalization among Brazilian and U.S.students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4.
Clark, M. , & Mills, M. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
5.
Dion, K. , Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
6.
Doi, L. T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
7.
Ekman, P. , & Friesen, W. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129.
8.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
9.
Forgas, J. (1983). The effects of prototypicality and cultural salience on the perceptions of people. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 153-173.
10.
Haruki, T. , Shigehisa, T., Nedate, K., Wajima, M., & Ogawa, R. (1984). Effects of alien reinforcement and its combined type on learning behavior and efficacy in relation to personality. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 527-545.
11.
Humphreys, L. G. (1980). The statistics of failure to replicate: A comment on Buriel's (1970) conclusions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 71-75.
12.
Humphreys, L. G. , Lin, P., & Fleishman, A. (1976). The sex by race interaction in cognitive measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 42-58.
13.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From facts to dispositions. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 220-266). New York: Academic Press
14.
Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, (Vol. 15). Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.
15.
Kluckhohn, C. , & Murray, H. (1948). Personality in nature, society and culture. New York: Knopf.
16.
Kraut, R. E. (1973). Effects of social labeling on giving to charity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 551-562.
17.
LaBarre, W. (1947). The cultural basis of emotions and gestures. Journal of Personality, 16, 49-68.
18.
Lonner, W. J. (1980). The search for psychological universals. In H. C. Triandis and W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, (Vol. 1, pp. 143-204). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Marin, G. (1985). Validez transcultural del pricipio de equidad: El colectivismo-individualismo come una varaible moderatora. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia Occupational, 4, 7-20.
20.
Marrow, A. (1928). Goal tension and recall. Journal of General Psychology, 19, 3-64.
21.
Marsella, A. , DeVos, G., & Hsu, F.L.K. (Eds.). (1985). Culture and self. London: Tavistock.
22.
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
23.
Miller, R. L. , Brickman, P., & Bolen, D. (1975). Attribution versus persuasion as a means of modifying behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 430-441.
24.
Osgood, C. E. , May, W., & Miron, M. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Pepitone, A. (1971). The role of justice in interdependent decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 144-156.
26.
Pepitone, A. (1976). Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 641-653.
27.
Pepitone, A. (1981). Lessons from the history of social psychology. American Psychologist, 9, 972-985.
28.
Pepitone, A. (1986). Culture and the cognitive paradigm in social psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, December.
29.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Toernblom, K. Y. , Johnson, D., & Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preference among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51-78.
31.
Triandis, H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: John Wiley.
32.
Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
33.
Triandis, H. C. (1978). Some universals of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 1-16.
34.
Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. In H. Howe and M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979 (Vol. 27, pp. 195-260). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
35.
Triandis, H. C. , David, E. E., & Takezawa, S. I. (1965). Some determinants of social distance among American, German and Japanese students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 540-551.
36.
Triandis, H. C. , Hui, C. H., Albert, R. D., Leung, S., Lisansky, J., Diaz, R., Plascencia, L., Marin, G., Betancourt, H., & Loyola, L. (1984). Individual models of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1389-1404.
37.
Triandis, H. C. , Marin, G., Lisansky, J., & Betancourt, H. (1984). Simpatu'a as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1363-1375.
38.
Triandis, H. C. , & Vassiliou, V. (1972). A comparative analysis of subjective cultures. In H. C. Triandis (Ed.), The analysis of subjective culture (pp. 299-338). New York: John Wiley.
39.
Triandis, H. C. , Vassiliou, V. & Nassiakou, M. (1968). Three cross-cultural studies of subjective culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 8, 1-42.
40.
Yang, K. S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In M. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 106-170). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
