Are Social Psychological Laws Cross-Culturally Valid?

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of social psychological findings across cultures and subcultures in order to evaluate the cross-cultural validity of empirically based social psychological laws. Six studies were sampled from four major social psychological journals. Each study was replicated on two Israeli samples, one similar to that of the original study and the other differing in some respect. Results indicate that those original findings that were replicated primarily involved main effects. Interactions were generally not replicated. Those interactions that proved significant were usually in directions different from those obtained in the original studies. These findings indicate the necessity for replications on both cross-cultural and intracultural levels. Methodological aspects of such studies are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amir, Y. , & Lewin, I. (1968). The Egyptian officer-A personality profile. Israel Army Printing Office.

Amir, Y. , Sharan, S. , & Kovarsky, Y. (1968). Birth order, family structure, and avoidance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 271-278.

Berger, M. (1954). The Arab world today. New York: Doubleday.

Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119-128.

Berry, J. W. (1978). Social psychology: Comparative, societal and universal. Canadian Psychological Review, 19, 93-104.

Frijda, N. , & Jahoda, G. (1966). On the scope and methods of cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 109-127.

Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jahoda, G. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on experimental social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 142-148.

10.

Jones, E. E. , & David, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

11.

McGuire, W. J. (1973). The Yin and Yang of progress in social psychology: 7 koans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(3), 446-456.

12.

McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextual theory of knowledge: Its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.

13.

Mussen, P. (1967). Early socialization: Learning and identification. New directions in psychology III. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

14.

Nisbett, R. E. (1977). Interactions versus main effects as goals of personality research. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Patai, R. (1973). The Arab mind. New York: Scribner's.

16.

Rabin, A. I. (1965). Growing up in the kibbutz. New York: Springer.

17.

Rodrigues, A. (1982). Replication: A neglected type of research in social psychology. Inter-American Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 91-109.

18.

Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

19.

Sharan, S. , Amir, Y. , & Kovarsky, Y. (1969). Birth order and level of task performance: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Social Psychology, 78 157-163.

20.

Schlenker, B. A. (1974). Social psychology and science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1-15.

21.

Triandis, H. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: John Wiley.