In a cross-cultural experiment the research sought to identify emic theories of individual and group influences on the performance control process. Results suggested that both Japanese and American managers have a Rational Man theory of the individual in the control process. However, differences occurred in their theory of group functioning: Americans tend to see groups as helping to reduce the risk of poor performance, whereas Japanese see them as enhancing good performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Befu, H. (1980, December). A critique of the group model of Japanese society. Social Analysis, No 5/6, pp. 29-43.
2.
De Nisi, A. S. , & Pritchard, R. D. (1978). Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 358-366.
3.
Hamilton, V. L. , & Sanders, J. (1983). Universals in judging wrongdoing: Japanese and Americans compared. American Sociological Review, 48, 199-211.
4.
Harris, M. (1980). Cultural materialism. New York: Vintage Books.
5.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Hofstede, G. (1984, January). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp. 81-89.
7.
Liden, R. C. , & Mitchell, T. R. (1983). The effects of group interdependence on supervisor performance evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 36, 289-299.
8.
Nakane, C. (1972). Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Ouchi, W. C. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
11.
Shaw, M. E. , & Iwawaki, S. (1972). Attribution of responsibility by Japanese and Americans as a function of age. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 71-81.
12.
Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414-432.
13.
Staw, B. M. (1980). Rationality and justification in organizational life. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 45-80). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
14.
Sullivan, J. J. (1983). A critique of Theory Z. Academy of Management Review, 8, 132-142.
