This study analyzed the responses of 1,184 college students from seven countries in the Americas regarding their auto- and heterostereotypes. The instrument included emic scales (culture-specific) and a set of etic scales (composed of semantic differential scales). The autostereotype as measured by the etic scales was found to be fairly positive in most groups of respondents. Both auto- and heterostereotypes were highly uniform (with uniformity on etic scales decreasing in countries that had experienced mutual conflict), highly intense (primarilyamong the autostereotypes), and congruent (principally those obtained through the emic scales). Mirror-imaging stereotyping was found among conflicting nations, and highly developed countries were perceived in a more positive fashion than the respondents' own group. High levels of contact and proximity produced negative stereotyping.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319-341.
2.
Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Toward the elimination of racism (pp. 245-308). New York: Pergamon.
3.
Angell, R. C. , Dunham, V. S., & Singer, J. D. (1964). Social values and foreign policy attitudes of Soviet and American elites. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 8, 329-391.
4.
Brewer, M. B. , & Campell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Brigham, J. C. (1971). Ethnic stereotypes. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 15-38.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror image in Soviet-American relations: A social psychologist's report. Journal of Social Issues, 17, 45-56.
7.
Buriel, R. , & Vasquez, R. (1982). Stereotypes of Mexican descent persons: Attitudes of three generations of Mexican Americans and Anglo-American adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 59-70.
8.
Byrne, D. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.
9.
Cauthen, N. R. , Robinson, E. A., & Krauss, H. H. (1971). Stereotypes: A review of the literature 1926-1968. Journal of Social Psychology, 84, 103-125.
10.
Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
11.
Díaz-Guerrero, R. , & Salas, M. (1975). El diferencial semántico del idioma espanol.Mexico: Trillas.
12.
Gardner, R. C. , Taylor, D. M., & Feenstra, H. J. (1970). Ethnic stereotypes: Attitudes or beliefs?Canadian Journal of Psychology, 24, 321-334.
13.
Haque, A. (1973). Mirror image hypothesis in the context of the Indo-Pakistani conflict. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, June, 13-22.
14.
Hofman, J. E. , & Zak, I. (1969). Interpersonal contact and attitude change in a cross-cultural situation. Journal of Social Psychology, 78, 165-171.
15.
Kelman, H. C. (1974). Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action. American Psychologist, 29, 310-324.
16.
LeVine, R. A. , & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York: John Wiley.
17.
Marín, G. (1984). Stereotyping Hispanics: The differential effect of research method, label and degree of contact. International Journal of Inter cultural Relations, 8, 17-27.
18.
Meggit, M. J. (1962). Desert people. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
19.
Middleton, J. (1960). Lugbara religion. London: Oxford University Press.
20.
O'Driscoll, M. , Haque, A., & Ohsako, T. (1983). Effects of contact and perceived attitude differences on social distance among Australian, Japanese, and Pakistani students. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 163-168.
21.
Ray, J. J. (1983). Racial attitudes and the contact hypothesis, Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 3-10.
22.
Salazar, J. M. (1982). Research on nationalism in Venezuela: An example of an approach to applying social psychology. Spanish-Language Psychology, 2, 185-192.
23.
Salazar, J. M. , & Mann, G. (1977). National stereotypes as a function of conflict and territorial proximity: A test of the mirror image hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 13-19.
24.
Salter, C. A. , & Teger, A. I. (1975). Change in attitudes toward other nations as a function of the type of international contact. Sociometry, 38, 213-222.
25.
Santoro, E. (1975). El diferencial semántico. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
26.
Sell, D. K. (1983). Research on attitude change in U.S. students who participate in foreign study experiences: Past findings and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Intergroup Relations, 7, 131-147.
27.
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
Sherif, M. , & Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension. New York: Harper & Row.
29.
Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. New York: Ginn.
30.
Swartz, M. J. (1961). Negative ethnocentrism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5, 75-81.
31.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
32.
Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
33.
Triandis, H. C. , Lisansky, J., Setiadi, B., Chang, B., Manrn, G., & Betancourt, H. (1982). Stereotyping among Hispanics and Anglos. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 409-426.
34.
Triandis, H. C. , & Marin, G. (1983a). Distortions introduced by the use of bipolar scales in stereotype research. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 153-154.
35.
Triandis, H. C. , & Manin, G. (1983b). Etic plus emic versus pseudoetic: A test of a basic assumption of contemporary cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 489-500.
36.
Triandis, H. C. , Marnn, G., & Lisansky, J. (in press). Simpatía as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
37.
Winder, A. E. (1952). White attitudes toward Negro-white interaction in an area of changing racial composition. American Psychologist, 7, 330-331.
38.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1-27.
