Personal Control and Crowding Stress

Abstract

Current theoretical explanations of crowding stress have suggested that peronal control may be an important psychological determinant of reactions to the physical environment. Two field surveys were conducted to test the relationship of environment stress and crowding annoyance with personal control and to examine whether this conception of crowding may have cross-cultural generality. In the first study, 282 patrons in a bookstore varying between low and high density were surveyed in regard to perceived control, self-reported stress, and crowding annoyance. Simple correlations and multiple regressions analysis supported the hypothesized relationship for most elements of personal control. In a second study, 185 Singaporean high school students were surveyed relative to residential crowding as a cross-cultural extension. Support was found for the hypothesized relationship between personal control with crowding annoyance and stress. The implications of these results for drawing cross-cultural similarities are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman, I. The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1975.

Altman, I. , & Chemers, M. Culture and environment. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1980.

Anderson, E. N. Some Chinese methods for dealing with crowding . Urban Anthropology, 1972, 1, 141-150.

Averill, J. R. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress . Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 286-303.

Barker, R. Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968.

Baron, R. , & Rodin, J. Personal control as a mediator of crowding. In A. Baum , J. Singer , & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.

Draper, P. Crowding among hunter-gatherers: the!Kung Bushmen . Science, 1973, 182, 301-303.

Freedman, J. L. Crowding and behavior. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1975.

Hall, E. T. The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.

10.

Johnson, C. Privacy as personal control . In Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association Conference. Stroudberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, 1974.

11.

Lazarus, R. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.

12.

Loo, C. Important issues in researching the effects of crowding on humans . Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1973, 4, 219-226.

13.

Mischel, W. Toward a cognitive-social learning reconceptualization of personality . Psychoogical Review, 1973, 80, 252-283.

14.

Schmidt, D. , Goldman, R. , & Feimer, N. Predicting perceptions of crowding at the residence, neighborhood, and city levels by psychological and physical measures. Environment and Behavior, 1979, 11, 105-130.

15.

Schmidt, D. , Goldman, R. , & Feimer, N. Physical and psychological factors associated with perceptions of crowding: an analysis of subcultural differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 279-289.

16.

Schmidt, D. , & Keating, J. Human crowding and personal control: an integration of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 680-700.

17.

Stokols, D. The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments . Environment and Behavior, 1976, 8, 49-86.

18.

Wicker, A. W. Processes which mediate behavior-environment congruence . Behavioral Science, 1972, 17, 265-277.

19.

Wicker, A. W. , Kirmeyer, S. , Hanson, L. , & Alexander, D. Effects of manning level on subjective experiences, performance, and verbal interactions in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 17, 251-274.