The determinants of congressional voting behavior on trade matters from 1991 to 1996 are investigated. Three personal characteristics of members of Congress—level of distrust toward others, perception of their control over their environment, and level of cognitive complexity—are examined for effect on voting patterns on proposals to lower barriers to international trade. These personality factors are included in a comprehensive model of congressional voting behavior. Results show that these variables had significant effects on specific trade votes, controlling for the impact of members' party, ideology, support for the presidency, and the nature of their district's workforce. These findings show that the personality attributes of legislators may have an important influence on their voting behavior, particularly on matters involving international cooperation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asher, H. B. , and H. F. Weisberg. 1978. Voting change in Congress: Some dynamic perspectives on an evolutionary process. American Journal of Political Science22:391-425.
2.
Bailey, M. , and D. W. Brady. 1998. Heterogeneity and representation: The Senate and free trade. American Journal of Political Science42:524-544.
3.
Baldwin, R. E.1985. The political economy of US import policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Bartels, L. M.1991. Constituency opinion and congressional policy making: The Reagan defense buildup. American Political Science Review85:457-474.
5.
Collie, M.1985. Voting behavior in legislatures. In Handbook of legislative research, edited by G. Loewenberg, S. Patterson, and M. Jewell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crichlow, S.1998. Idealism or pragmatism? An operational code analysis of Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. Political Psychology19:683-706.
8.
Etheredge, L. S.1978. Personality effects on American foreign policy, 1898-1968: A test of interpersonal generalization theory. American Political Science Review72:434-451.
9.
Gartzke, E. , and J. M. Wrighton. 1998. Thinking globally or acting locally? Determinants of the GATT vote in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly23:33-55.
10.
Glazer, A. , and M. Robbins. 1985. Congressional response to constituency change. American Journal of Political Science29:259-273.
11.
Grenzke, J. M.1989. Shopping in the congressional supermarket: The currency is complex. American Journal of Political Science33:1-24.
12.
Hermann, M. G.1977. Some personal characteristics related to foreign aid voting of congressmen. In A psychological examination of political leaders, edited by M. Hermann, 311-334. New York: Free Press.
13.
Hermann, M. G.1980. Explaining political behavior using personal characteristics of political leaders. International Studies Quarterly24:7-46.
14.
Hermann, M. G.1984. Personality and foreign policy: A study of 53 heads of government. In Foreign policy decision making: Perceptions, cognition, and artificial intelligence, edited by D. Sylvan and S. Chan, 53-80. New York: Praeger.
15.
Hermann, M. G.1987. Handbook for assessing personal characteristics and foreign policy orientations of political leaders. Columbus, OH: Mershon Occasional Papers.
16.
Herrmann, R. K.1986. The power of perceptions in foreign policy decision making: Do views of the Soviet Union determine the policy choices of American leaders?American Journal of Political Science30:841-875.
17.
Holian, D. B. , T. B. Krebs, and M. H. Walsh. 1997. Constituency opinion, Ross Perot, and roll-call behavior in the U.S. House: The case of NAFTA. Legislative Studies Quarterly22:369-391.
18.
Holsti, O.1970. The operational code approach to the study of political leaders: John Foster Dulles' philosophical and instrumental beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science3:123-157.
19.
Kahane, L. H.1996. Congressional voting patterns on NAFTA: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology55:395-409.
20.
Kalt, J. P. , and M. A. Zupan. 1984. Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics. American Economic Review74:279-300.
21.
Langer, E.1983. The psychology of control. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Lefcourt, H.1976. Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Marks, S. V.1993. Economic interests and voting on the omnibus trade bill of 1987. Public Choice75:21-42.
24.
Matthews, D. R. , and J. A. Stimson. 1970. Decision-making by the U.S. House of Representatives: A preliminary model. In Political decision-making, edited by S. S. Ulmer. New York: Litton.
25.
Mayhew, D. R.1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
McArthur, J. , and S. V. Marks. 1988. Constituent interest vs. legislator ideology: The role of political opportunity cost. Economic Inquiry26:461-470.
27.
McCrone, D. J. , and J. H. Kuklinski. 1979. The delegate theory of representation. American Journal of Political Science23:278-300.
28.
Miller, W. E. , and D. E. Stokes. 1963. Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review57:45-57.
29.
Nollen, S. D. , and H. J. Iglarsh. 1990. Explanations of protectionism in international trade votes. Public Choice66:137-153.
30.
Nollen, S. D. , and D. P. Quinn. 1994. Free trade, fair trade, strategic trade, and protectionism in the U.S. Congress, 1987-88. International Organization48:491-525.
31.
Ostrom, E.1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review92:1-22.
32.
Peltzman, S.1984. Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics27:181-210.
33.
Poole, K. T.1988. Recent developments in analytical models of voting in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly13:117-133.
34.
Poole, K. T. , and H. Rosenthal. 1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science35:228-278.
35.
Poole, K. T. , and H. Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Schneider, J.1979. Ideological coalitions in congress. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
37.
Segal, J. , C. Cameron, and A. Cover. 1992. A spatial model of roll call voting: Senators, constituents, presidents, and interest groups in Supreme Court confirmations. American Journal of Political Science36:96-121.
38.
Shepard, G. H.1988. Personality effects on American foreign policy, 1969-1984: A second test of interpersonal generalization theory. International Studies Quarterly32:91-123.
39.
Starr, H.1984. Henry Kissinger: Perceptions of international politics. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
40.
Stuart, D. and H. Starr. 1981. The “inherent bad faith model” reconsidered: Dulles, Kennedy, and Kissinger. Political Psychology3:1-33.
41.
Suedfeld, P. , M. D. Wallace, and K. L. Thachuk. 1993. Changes in integrative complexity among Middle Eastern leaders during the Persian Gulf crisis. Journal of Social Issues69:183-199.
42.
Tetlock, P. E.1981. Personality and isolationism: Content analysis of senatorial speeches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39:737-743.
43.
Tetlock, P. E.1983. Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41:118-126.
44.
Thomas, M.1985. Election proximity and senatorial roll call voting. American Journal of Political Science29:96-111.
45.
Tosini, S. C. , and E. Tower. 1987. The textile bill of 1985: The determinants of congressional voting patterns. Public Choice54:19-25.
46.
Walker, S. G.1977. The interface between beliefs and behavior: Henry Kissinger's operational code and the Vietnam War. Journal of Conflict Resolution21:129-168.
47.
Walker, S. G. , M. Schafer, and M. D. Young. 1998. Systematic procedures for operational code analysis: Measuring and modeling Jimmy Carter's operational code. International Studies Quarterly42:175-190.
48.
Weintraub, W.1986. Personality profiles of American presidents as revealed in their public statements: The presidential news conferences of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Political Psychology7:285-295.
49.
Welch, S.1985. Are women more liberal than men in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly10:125-134.
50.
Wink, K. , D. Livingston, and J. Garand. 1996. Dispositions, constituencies, and cross-pressures: Modeling roll-call voting on the North American Free Trade Agreement in the U.S. House. Political Research Quarterly49:749-770.
51.
Winter, D. G.1973. The power motive. New York: Free Press.
52.
Winter, D. G.1987. Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52:196-202.
53.
Winter, D. G.1990. Measuring personality at a distance: Development of an integrated system for scoring motives in a running text. In Perspectives in personality: Approaches to understanding lives, edited by A. J. Stewart, J. M. Healy Jr., and D. J. Ozer. London: Jessica Kingsley.
54.
Winter, D. G.1993. Personality and leadership in the Gulf War. In The political psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, publics, and the process of conflict, edited by S. A. Renshon, 107-117. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
55.
Winter, D. G. , M. G. Hermann, W. Weintraub, and S. G. Walker. 1991. The personalities of Bush and Gorbachev measured at a distance: Procedures, portraits, and policy. Political Psychology12:215-245.
56.
Winter, D. G. , and A. J. Stewart. 1977. Content analysis as a method of studying political leaders. In A psychological examination of political leaders, edited by M. G. Hermann, 28-61. New York: Free Press.
57.
Young, M. D. , and M. Schafer. 1998. Is there method in our madness? Ways of assessing cognition in international relations. Mershon International Studies Review42:63-96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
