The effects of domestic strife on the likelihood of an international conflict are tested empirically. A rare-events logit model with corrections for temporal dependence to assess whether domestic strife is related to the initiation of international conflicts is used to test the validity of the diversionary conflict thesis. Results suggest that decision makers do initiate international conflicts when the state is undergoing domestic strife, although not in a predicted manner. The results indicate that violent domestic strife increases the likelihood of a diversionary conflict, whereas nonviolent strife increases the likelihood of repression. The research also presents evidence that calls into question some of the claims made in previous studies and demonstrates that domestic strife in a target state increases the likelihood of being attacked.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barbieri, Katherine . 1996. Economic interdependence: A path to peace or a source of interstate conflict?Journal of Peace Research33:29-50.
2.
Beck, Nathaniel , and Matthew Baum. 2000. Trade and conflict in the cold war era: An empirical analysis using directed dyads. Presented at ECPR Workshop on Trade and Conflict, Copenhagen.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel , Jonathan Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously in binary time series cross section analysis. American Journal of Political Science42:1260-1288.
4.
Bremer, Stuart . 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of international war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36:309-341.
5.
Bremer, Stuart . 1993. Democracy and militarised interstate conflict, 1816-1965. International Interactions17:231-249.
6.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 1980. Theories of international conflict: An analysis and an appraisal. In Handbook of political conflict, edited by Ted Robert Gurr. New York: Free Press.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and David Lalman. 1992. War and reason: Domestic and international imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Coser, L. A.1956. The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
9.
Dassel, Kurt , and Eric Reinhardt1999. Domestic strife and the initiation of violence at home and abroad. American Journal of Political Science43:56-85.
10.
Downs, George , and David Rocke. 1995. Optimal imperfection? Domestic uncertainty and institutions in international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Enterline, Andrew J.1996. Correspondence on “Driving while democratizing.”International Security20:183-196.
12.
Fordham, Benjamin . 1998. The politics of threat perception and the use of force: A political economy model of US uses of force, 1949-1994. International Studies Quarterly42:567-590.
13.
Geller, Daniel S.1993. Power differentials and war in rival dyadsInternational Studies Quarterly37:173-194.
14.
Gelpi, Christopher . 1997. Democratic diversions: Governmental structure and the externalization of domestic conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution41:255-282.
15.
Gleditsch, Kristian S.2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution46:712-724.
16.
Goertz, Gary , and Paul Diehl. 1992. Territorial changes and international conflict. London: Routledge.
17.
Gurr, Ted Robert , Keith Jaggers, and Wil H. Moore. 1989. Polity II: Political structures and regime change, 1800-1986 (Study no. 9263). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
18.
Hazlewood, Leo . 1975. Diversions mechanisms and encapsulation processes: The domestic conflict, foreign conflict hypothesis reconsidered. In Sage international yearbook of international studies, edited by Pat J. McGowan, 231-243. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Heldt, Birger . 1997. The dependent variable of the domestic-external conflict relationship: Anecdotes, theories and systematic studies. Journal of Peace Research34:101-106.
20.
Heldt, Birger . 1999. Domestic politics, absolute deprivation, and the use of armed force in interstate territorial disputes, 1950-1999. Journal of Conflict Resolution43:451-478.
21.
Jaggers, Keith , and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32:469-482.
22.
James, Patrick , and John R Oneal1991. Influences on the president's use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:307-334.
23.
Jodice, D. , and D. L. Taylor. (1988). World handbook of social and political indicators III (ICPSR 7761). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Kegley Charles W. , Neil R. Richardson, and Gunther Richter. 1978. Conflict at home and abroad. Journal of Politics40:742-752.
25.
King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 1999. Logistic regression in rare Events data. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu/preprints.shtml.
26.
Lebow, Richard Ned1981. Between peace and war: The nature of international crises. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Leeds, Brett Ashley , and David Davis. 1997. Domestic political vulnerability and international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution41:814-834.
28.
Levy, Jack . 1989. The diversionary theory of war: A critique. In Handbook of war studies, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky. New York: Unwin Hyman.
29.
Levy, Jack , and L. Vakili. 1992. Diversionary action by authoritarian regimes: Argentina in the Falklands/Malvinas case. In The internationalization of communal strife, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky. New York: Routledge.
30.
Lian, Bradley , and John H. Oneal. 1993. Presidents, the use of military force, and public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:277-300.
31.
Mansfield, Edward D. , and Jack Snyder. 1995a. Democratization and the danger of war. International Security20:5-38.
32.
Mansfield, Edward D. , and Jack Snyder. 1995b. Democratization and war. Foreign Affairs74 (May/June): 79-97.
33.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace 1946-1986. American Political Science Review87:624-638.
34.
Mayer, Arno J.1971. Internal crises and war since 1870. In Revolutionary situations In Europe, edited by C. Bertrand. Quebec: Interuniversity Centre for European Studies.
35.
Meernik, James , and Peter Waterman. 1996. The myth of the diversionary use of force by American presidents. Political Research Quarterly49:573-590.
36.
Mintz, Alex , and Bruce Russett. 1992. The dual economy and Arab Israeli use of force: A transnational system? In Defence, welfare, and growth, edited by Steve Chan and Alex Mintz, 179-197. New York: Routledge.
37.
Morgan, T. Clifton , and Kenneth N. Bickers. 1992. Domestic discontent and the external use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution36:25-52.
38.
Mueller, John . 1973. War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley.
39.
Oneal, John R. , Frances H. Oneal, Zeev Maoz, and Bruce Russett. 1996. The liberal peace: Interdependence, democracy, and international conflict, 1950-1985. Journal of Peace Research33:11-28.
40.
Oneal, John R. , and Bruce Russett. 1998. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly41:267-294.
41.
Oneal, John R. , and Bruce Russett. 1999. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research36:423-432.
42.
Organski, A. F. K. , and Jacek Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Ostrom, Charles W. , and Brian L. Job.1986. The president and the political use of force. American Political Science Review80:541-566.
44.
Richards, Diana, T.Clifton Morgan , Valerie Schwebach, and Garry D. Young. 1993. Good times, bad times, and the diversionary use of force: A tale of some not-so-free agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:504-535.
45.
Rosecrance, Richard N.1963. Action and reaction in world politics. Boston: Little, Brown.
46.
Russett, Bruce . 1987. Economic change as a cause of international conflict. In Peace, defense and economic analysis, edited by Christian Schmidt and Frank Blackaby, 185-205. London: McMillan.
47.
Russett, Bruce . 1990. Economic decline, electoral pressure, and the initiation of interstate conflict. In Prisoners of war? Nation-states in the modern era, edited by Charles S. Gochman and Alan N. Sabrosky, 123-140. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
48.
Salmore, Barbara G. , and Steven A. Salmore. 1973. Political regimes and foreign policy. In Why nations act, edited by Morris A. East, Steven A. Salmore, and Chris F. Hermann, 103-123. London: Sage.
49.
Simmel, George . 1955. Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
50.
Stohl, Michael (1980). The nexus of civil and international conflict. In Handbook of political conflict, edited by Ted Robert Gurr, 297-330. New York: Free Press.
51.
Thompson, William R. , and Richard M. Tucker. 1997. A tale of two democratic peace critiques. Journal of Conflict Resolution41:428-451.
52.
Waltz, Kenneth . 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.
53.
Ward, Michael D. , and Kristian S. Gleditsch. 1998. Democratizing for peace. American Political Science Review92:51-61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
