Original power transition theory is extended by relaxing the restrictive assumption of the method of augmenting national power. The occurrence of war in East Asia from 1860 to 1993 is examined to see if the revised power transition argument holds for the conflicts in East Asia. Results show that conflicts in East Asia occur under the same general conditions that lead to war in the international system and that war is most likely when the dissatisfied challenger approximates the dominant power. The evidence also suggests that the role of alliances is crucial for mitigating or militating the risk of war, contrary to the standard power transition formulation. Because alliances play a central role in the risk of wars, the dangers of such a conflict in East Asia (or elsewhere) can be managed through skillful strategies of alignment and de-alignment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altfeld, Michael , and Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. 1979. Choosing sides in wars. International Studies Quarterly23:87-112.
2.
Bennett, D. Scott , and Allan C. Stam III. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26:179-204.
3.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan C. Stam III. 2002. EUGene: Expected utility generation and data management program. Retrieved June 21, 2002, from http://www.eugenesoftware.org.
4.
Benson, Michelle . 1998. Measuring the international status quo: The hegemon vs. the stag hunt. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
5.
Benson, Michelle , and Jacek Kugler. 1998. Power parity, democracy, and the severity of internal violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution42:196-209.
6.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 2000. Principles of international politics: People's power, preferences, and perceptions. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 2002. Forecasting policy futures. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
9.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce , and David Lalman. 1992. War and reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Buss, Claude A.1955. The Far East: A history of recent and contemporary international relations in East Asia. New York: Macmillan.
11.
Cameron, Meribeth E. , Thomas H. Mahoney, and George E. McReynolds. 1952. China, Japan, and the powers. New York: Ronald Press.
12.
Cantori, Louis J. , and Steven L. Spiegel. 1970. The international politics of regions: A comparative approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Claude, Inis L., Jr.1962. Power and international relations. New York: Random House.
14.
Clyde, Paul H.1958. The Far East: A history of the impact of the West on Eastern Asia. 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
DiCicco, Jonathan M. 1998. Power transitions, parity, and war onset: A critical review. Paper presented at the 1998 annual meeting of the Peace Science Society, October 16-18, in East Brunswick, NJ.
16.
DiCicco, Jonathan M. , and Jack Levy. 1999. Power shifts and problem shifts. Journal of Conflict Resolution43:675-704.
17.
Geller, Daniel S.1992. Capability concentration, power transition, and war. International Interactions17:269-284.
18.
Geller, Daniel S.1993. Power differentials and war in rival dyads. International Studies Quarterly37:173-193.
19.
Gibler, Douglas M. 1998. State satisfaction and the initiation of disputes and wars: Creating a new measure of satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Minneapolis, MN.
20.
Gilpin, Robert . 1981. War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Gochman, Charles S. 1975. Status, conflict, and war: The major powers, 1820-1970. Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
22.
Greene, Fred . 1957. The Far East. New York: Rinehart.
23.
Gulick, Edward . 1955. Europe's classical balance of power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Hanushek, Eric A. , and John E. Jackson. 1977. Statistical methods for social scientists. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25.
Houweling, Henk , and Jan Siccama. 1988. Power transitions as a cause of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution32:87-102.
26.
Hwang, Y. B. , and Jacek Kugler. 1997. The likelihood of major war in East Asia and the transition on the Korean peninsula. Asian Perspective21:41-62.
27.
Iusi-Scarborough, Grace , and Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. 1988. Threat and alignment behavior. International Interaction14:85-93.
28.
Kaplan, Morton A.1957. System and process in international politics. New York: Wiley.
29.
Kim, Woosang . 1991. Alliance transitions and great power war. American Journal of Political Science35:833-850.
30.
Kim, Woosang . 1992. Power transitions and great power war from Westphalia to Waterloo. World Politics45:153-172.
31.
Kim, Woosang . 1996. Power parity, alliance, and war from 1648 to 1975. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
Kim, Woosang . 1997. Power transition and strategic stability in East Asia. Asian Perspective21:153-170.
33.
Kim, Woosang , and James D. Morrow. 1992. When do shifts in power lead to war?American Journal of Political Science36:896-922.
34.
Kugler, Jacek , and Douglas Lemke, eds. 1996. Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35.
Lemke, Douglas . 1996. Small states and war: An expansion of power transition theory. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Lemke, Douglas . 1997. Peace and war in the Far East: An application of the multiple hierarchy model. Paper presented at the 1997 International Studies Association (ISA) annual meeting, March, in Toronto, Canada.
37.
Lemke, Douglas , and William Reed. 1996. Regime type and status quo evaluations: Power transition theory and the democratic peace. International Interactions22:143-164.
38.
Lemke, Douglas , and William Reed. 1998. Power is not satisfaction: A comment on de Soysa, Oneal, and Park. Journal of Conflict Resolution42:511-516.
39.
Lemke, Douglas , and Suzanne Werner. 1996. Power parity, commitment to change, and war. International Studies Quarterly40:235-260.
40.
Levy, Jack . 1987. Declining power and the preventive motivation for war. World Politics40:82-107.
41.
MacNair, Harley F. , and Donald F. Lach. 1955. Modern Far Eastern international relations. 2d ed. New York: Van Nostrand.
42.
Morgenthau, Hans J.1973. Politics among nations. New York: Knopf.
43.
Most, Benjamin Al , and Harvey Starr. 1984. International relations theory, foreign policy substitutability, and “nice” laws. World Politics36:383-406.
44.
Most, Benjamin Al , and Harvey Starr. 1989. Inquiry, logic and international politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
45.
Oneal, John R. , Indra de Soysa, and Yong-Hee Park. 1998. But power and wealth are satisfying: A reply to Lemke and Reed. Journal of Conflict Resolution42:517-520.
46.
Organski, A. F. K.1968. World politics. New York: Knopf.
47.
Organski, A. F. K. , and Jacek Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Russett, Bruce , and Harvey Starr. 1992. World politics: The menu for choice. 4th ed. New York: Freeman.
49.
Signorino, Curtis S. , and Jeffrey M. Ritter. 1999. Tau-b or not tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43:115-144.
50.
Small, Melvin , and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
Steiger, G. Nye . 1944. A history of the Far East. Boston: Ginn.
52.
Tammen, Ronald L. , Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Allan C. Stam III, Carole Alsharabati, Mark Andrew Abdollahian, Brian Efird, and A. F. K. Organski. 2000. Power transitions: Strategies for the 21st century. New York: Chatham House.
53.
Taylor, A. J. P.1971. The struggle for mastery in Europe, 1848-1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
Vasquez, John A.1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Vasquez, John A.1996. When are power transitions dangerous? An appraisal and reformulation of power transition theory. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
56.
Vinacke, Harold M.1936. A history of the Far East in modern times. 2d rev. ed. New York: Crofts.
57.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58.
Weede, Erich . 1976. Overwhelming preponderance as a pacifying condition among contiguous Asian dyads, 1950-1969. Journal of Conflict Resolution20:395-411.
59.
Werner, Suzanne , and Jacek Kugler. 1996. Power transitions and military buildups: Resolving the relationship between arms buildups and war. In Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger, edited by Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
