Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The fiber-matrix interphase is commonly altered in graphite fiber rein-forced composites by changing the level of surface treatment imparted to the fibers and by using different fiber sizings. In this study, the influence of both surface treatment and fiber sizing on the mechanical properties of unidirectional composites was studied. Three material systems having the same high modulus Apollo carbon fibers (manufactured by Courtoulds Research) and HC 9106-3 toughened epoxy matrix, but with different fiber sizing and surface treatment, were used to study the effects of the interphase. For convenience, these are designated 810 A, 820 A and 8100 systems. The fibers used in the 810 A and 8100 systems received 100% industry standard surface treatment, while the fibers used in the 820 A system received 200% industry standard surface treatment. The "A" and "O" represent unreacted bisphenol-A epoxy and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) sizing respectively. The formation of distinctly different interphase in these three material systems was confirmed using a pernanganic etching technique. The etching study also revealed a highly nonuniform distribution of PVP in the 8100 system. Unidirectional tensile test results indicated significant reduction in the longitudinal stiffness of the PVP sized 8100 laminates. However, the tensile strength and failure strain of this system were vastly greater than those of the epoxy sized 810 A laminates. The systems with 10% and 200% levels of fiber surface treatment had similar longitudinal tensile properties. Transverse tensile test results indicated that the interracial bond strength was greatest in the 820 A system and lowest in the PVP sized 8100 system. The transverse flexural strength of the 8100 and 820 A systems were however found to be significantly greater than that of the 810 A system. It is postulated that the differences in unidirectional mechanical properties in these material systems are essentially due to differences in the interfacial bond strength and efficiency of load transfer from the matrix to the fiber.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Madhukar, M. S. and L. T. Drzal . 1990. "Effect of Fiber-Matrix Adhesion on the Longitudinal Compressive Properties of Graphite/Epoxy Composites," Proceedings of the Fifth Technical Conference of American Society for Composites, pp. 849-858

2. Madhukar, M. S. and L. T. Drzal . 1991. "Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effects on Composite Mechanical Properties: I. In-Plane and Interlaminar Shear Behavior of Graphite/Epoxy Composites," Journal of Composite Materials, 25:932-957.

3. Madhukar, M. S. and L. T. Drzal . 1991. "Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effects on Composite Mechanical Properties: II. Longitudinal and Transverse Tensile and Flexure Behavior of Graphite/Epoxy Composites," Journal of Composite Materials, 25:958-991.

4. Madhukar, M. S. and L. T. Drzal . 1992. "Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effects on Composite Mechanical Properties: IV. Mode I and Mode II Fracture Toughness of Graphite/Epoxy Composites," Journal of Composite Materials, 26:936-968.

5. Lehmann, S. , C. Megerdigian and R. Papalia . 1985. "Carbon Fiber/Resin Matrix Interphase: Effect of Carbon Fiber Surface Treatment on Composite Performance," SAMPE Quarterly (April):7-13.

6. Peters, P. W. M. and H. Albertsen . 1991. "The Fiber/Matrix Interphase in CFRP with a Phase-Separating Matrix System," Interfacial Phenomena in Composite Materials, Proc. H International Conference, I. Verpoest , ed., Sept. 17-19, pp. 101-104.

7. Albertsen, H. and P. W. M. Peters . 1991. "The Influence of Fiber/Matrix Interphase Strength on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness on CFRP," Interfacial Phenomena in Composite Materials, Proc. H Internatimal Conference, I. Verpoest , ed., Sept. 17-19, pp. 247-248.

8. Schwartz, H. S. and J. T. Hartness . 1987. "Effect of Fiber Coatings on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Composites," Toughened Composites, ASTM STP 937, N. J. Johnston , ed., Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 50-178.

9. Ivens, J. , M. Wvers , I. Verpoest and P. de Meester . 1989. "Influence of the Fiber-Matrix Interface on the Matrix Crack Development in Carbon-Epoxy Cross-Ply Laminates," in Developments in the Science and Technology of Composite Materials, ECCM 3, A. R. Bunsell , P. Lamicq and A. Massiah , eds., March, pp. 465-471.

10.

10. Lesko, J. J. et al. 1992. "A Global Local Investigation of Compressive Strength to Determine the Influence of the Fiber/Matrix Interphase," Symposium of Compression Response of Composite Structures, Miami, FL, November 16-17, submitted for peer review, ASTM STP.

11.

11. Ivens, J. , M. Wevers and I. Verpoest . 1991. "An Energy Based Model for the Influence of the Fiber-Matrix Interface Strength on the Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of UD-Composite Laminates," in Local Mechanics Concepts for Composite Material System, 1UTAM Symposium, J. N. Reddy and K. L. Reifsnider , eds., Blacksburg, VA, pp. 215-228.

12.

12. Drzal, L. T. , M. Madhukar and M. C. Waterbury . i992. "Surface Chemical and Surface Energetic Alterations of the IM6 Carbon Fiber Surface " Proceedings of the Adhesion Society, 15th Annual Meeting, February, pp. 144-147.

13.

13. Lehmann, S. , R. Robinson and M. K. Tae . 1986. "Characterization of Carbon Fiber/Resin Matrix Interphase," presented at the 31st International SAMPE Symposium, April 7-10, pp. 291-302.

14.

14. Lee, S. M. , 1992. "Influence of Fiber/Matrix Interfacial Adhesion on Composite Fracture Behavior," Composites Science and Technology, 43:317-327.

15.

15. Lesko, J. J. , S. Subramanian , D. A. Dillard and K. L. Reifsnider . "The Influence of Fiber Sizes Developed Interphases on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness," to be presented at the 39th International SAMPE Conference, Anaheim, CA, April 11-14, 1994.

16.

16. Hinkley, J. A.

"Effect of Fiber-Matrix Adhesion on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Graphite Thermoplastic Composites,"

Composite Applications: Role of Matrix, Fiber and Interface, T. L. Vigo and B. J. Kinzig , eds., pp. 267-275.

17.

17. Swain, R. E. 1992. "The Role of the Fiber/Matrix Interphase in the Fatigue Behavior of Polymeric Composite Laminates," Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

18.

18. Chang, Y. S. 1992. "The Effect of the Interphase/Interface Region on Creep and Creep Rupture of Thermoplastic Composites," Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

19.

19. Lesko, J. J. , R. E. Swain , J. M. Cartwright , J. W. Chin , K. L. Reifsnider , D. A. Dillard and J. P. Wightman . "Interphases Developed from Fiber Sizings and Their Chemical-Structural Relationship to Composite Compressive Performance," submitted to the Journal of Adhesion, February, 1993.

20.

20. Dolan, G. L. , R. Wong and D. W. Wilson . 1989. "Development of Ultralightweight Materials," Fourth Quarterly Interim Technical Report, Air Force Contract No. F 33615-88-C-5452, May.

21.

21. Peacock, J. , B. Fife , E. Nield and R. A. Crick . 1986 "Examination of the Morphology of Aromatic Polymer Composites (APC-2) Using an Etching Technique," in Composite Interfaces, H. Ishida and J. L. Koenig , eds., Elsevier Science Publishing Co., pp. 299-306.

22.

22. Olley, R. H. , D. C. Bassett and D. J. Blundell . 1986. "Permanganic Etching of PEEK," Polymer, 27:344-348.

23.

23. Peters, P. W. M. and H. Albertsen . 1991. "The Fiber-Matrix Interphase in CFRP with a Phase Separating Matrix System," Interfacial Phenomena in Composite Materials, Leuven, Sept. 17-19, pp. 101-104.

24.

24. Palmese, G. R. , O. A. Andersen and V. M. Karbhari . "Effect of Glass Fiber Sizing on the Cure Kinetics of Vinyl Ester Resins," submitted to the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1994.

25.

25. Hahn, G. , R. Wong , W.-F. Hwang , T. Harness , L. T. Drzal , R. Robinson and S. Smith . 1990. "Development of Ultralightweight Materials," Tenth Quarterly Interim Technical Report, Air Force Contract No. F 33615-88-C-5452, Nov.

26.

26. Rosen, B. W. 1964. "Tensile Failure of Fibrous Composites," AIAA Journal, 2(11):1985-1991.

27.

27. Batdorf, S. B. 1982. "Tensile Strength of Unidirectionally Reinforced Composites—I," J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 1:153-164.

28.

28. Batdorf, S. B. 1982. "Tensile Strength of Unidirectionally Reinforced Composites—II," J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 1:165-176.

29.

29. Gao, Z. and K. L. Reifsnider . 1992. "Tensile Failure of Composites: Influence of Interface and Matrix Yielding," Journal of Composites Technology and Research, 14(4):201-210.

30.

30. Weil, N. A. and I. M. Daniel . 1968. "Analysis of Fracture Probabilities in Nonuniformly Stressed Brittle Materials," Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 47:268-274.

Characterization of the Fiber-Matrix Interphase and its Influence on Mechanical Properties of Unidirectional Composites

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References