Stitching vs. a Toughened Matrix: Compression Strength Effects

Abstract

The compression strength of a stitched and a toughened matrix graphite/epoxy composite was determined and compared to a baseline unstitched untoughened composite. Two different layups with a variety of test lengths were tested under both ambient and hot/wet conditions. At longer gage lengths where failure was due to global buckling, no significant difference in strength was found between the different materials. For shorter specimens, a 30% reduction in strength due to stitching was found for both layups, presumably due to an increase in fiber misalignment. An observed increasing strength with decreasing gage length was found for all materials and was explained using statistics and a random distribution of flaws (misaligned fibers). The toughened material showed a small increase in strength over the baseline material, presumably due to the compensating effects of a more compliant matrix and straighter fibers. A hot/wet environment reduced the strength of the baseline and stitched material by 30% and the toughened material by 20%. Video images of the failing specimen supported the theory of a random distribution of flaws controlling composite failure.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. N. J. Johnston , ed., 1985. Toughened Composites, ASTM STP 937, Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

2. Dow, M. B. , D. L. Smith and S. J. Lubowinski . 1989. "An Evaluation of Stitching Concepts for Damage-Tolerant Composites," Fiber-Tex 1988 Conference Proceedings, NASA CP 3038, pp. 53-73.

3. Jang, B. Z. , W. K. Shih and W. C. Chung . 1989. "Mechanical Properties of Multidirectional Fiber Composites," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 8:538-564.

4. Lubowinski, S. J. , E. G. Guynn , W. Elber and J. D. Whitcomb . 1990. "Loading Rate Sensitivity of Open-Hole Composite Specimens in Compression," Composite Materials: Testing and Design, S. P. Gargbo , ed., Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 457-476.

5. Berg, J. S. and D. F. Adams . 1989. "An Evaluation of Composite Material Compression Test Methods," Journal of Composites Technology and Research, 11:41-46.

6. Tan, S. C. 1990. "Stress Analysis and the Evaluation of Celanese and IITRI Compression Test Specimens," Composites in Transition, Proceedings of the American Society for Composites, pp. 827-838.

7. Wisnom, M. R. 1991. "Effect of Shear Stresses in Indirect Compression Tests of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber/Epoxy," AIM Journal, 29:1692-1697.

8. Cano, R. J. and M. B. Dow . 1992. "Properties of Five Toughened Matrix Composite Materials," NASA TP-3254.

9. Micro Measurements . 1979. "Strain Gage Applications with M-Bond AE-10/15 and M-Bond GA-2 Systems," Instruction Bulletin B-137-15, Raleigh, NC: Measurements Group.

10.

10. Lauraitis, K. N. and P. E. Sandorff . 1979. "The Effect of Environment on the Compressive Strengths of Laminated Epoxy Matrix Composites," AMFL-TR-79-4179, Ohio: Air Force Materials Laboratory.

11.

11. Wung, E. C. J. and S. N. Chatterjee . 1992. "On the Failure Mechanisms in Laminated Compression Specimens and the Measurement of Strengths," Journal of Composite Materials, 26:1885-1914.

12.

12. Timoshenko, S. 1936. Theory of Elastic Stability. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., p. 140.

13.

13. Newmark, N. M. 1949. "A Simple Approximate Formula for Effective End-Fixity of Columns," Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 16:116.

14.

14. Murri, G. B. , S. A. Salpekar and T. K. O'Brien . 1991. "Fatigue Delamination Onset Prediction in Unidirectional Tapered Laminates," Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP 1110, T. K. O'Brien , ed., Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 3:312-339.

15.

15. Odom, E. M. and D. F. Adams . 1990. "Failure Mode of Unidirectional Carbon/Epoxy Composite Compression Specimens," Composites, 21:289-296.

16.

16. Weibull, W. A. 1951. -A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability," Journal of Applied Mechanics, 18:293.

17.

17. Hitchon, J. W. and D. C. Phillips . 1978. "The Effect of Specimen Size on the Strength of CFRP," Composites, 9:119-124.

18.

18. Adams, D. F. and E. Q. Lewis . 1991. "Influence of Specimen Gage Length and Loading Method on the Axial Compressive Strength of a Unidirectional Composite Material," Experimental Mechanics, 31:14-20.

19.

19. Haeberle, J. and F. L. Matthews . 1990. "Studies on Compressive Failure in Unidirectional CFRP Using an Improved Test Method," Developments in the Science and Technology of Composite Materials, J. Fuller et al. , eds., Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Composite Materials. Stuttgart, FRG: Elsevier Applied Science, pp. 517-521.

20.

20. Wisnom, M. R. 1991. "The Effect of Specimen Size on the Bending Strength of Unidirectional Carbon Fibre-Epoxy," Composite Structures, 18:47-63.

21.

21. Wisnom, M. R. 1990. "The Effect of Fibre Misalignment on the Compressive Strength of Unidirectional Carbon Fibre/Epoxy," Composites, 21:403-407.

22.

22. Adams, D. F. 1987. "A Micro Mechanics Analysis of the Influence of the Interface on the Performance of Polymer Matrix Composites," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 6:66-68.

23.

23. Richard, R. M. and J. R. Blacklock . 1968. "Finite Element Analysis of Inelastic Structures," AIAA Journal, 7:432-438.

24.

24. Coquill, S. L. and D. F. Adams . 1989. "Mechanical Properties of Several Neat Polymer Matrix Materials and Unidirectional Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composites," NASA CR-181805.

25.

25. Camponeschi, E. T., Jr. 1991. "Lamina Waviness Levels in Thick Composites and Its Effect on Their Compression Strength," Composites: Design, Manufacture, and Application," S. W. Tsai and G. S. Springer , eds., Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM/8), 30-E: 1-13.

26.

26. Gripple, K. 1990. "A Comparison of the Compression Response of Thick (6.35 mm) and Thin (1.6 mm) Dry and Moisture Saturated AS4/3501-6 Laminates," DTRC-SME-90/74. Bethesda, MD: David Taylor Research Center.