This study aims to examine the influence of geometric and mechanical properties on the bending behavior of supported FG sandwich beams, utilizing a refined shear deformation theory. The material properties are assumed to vary gradually and continuously according to a power-law distribution based on the volume fractions of the constituent materials. By applying the developed analytical model and the Navier solution technique, numerical results for non-dimensional stresses and displacements are computed and compared with those derived from other 2D theories. Furthermore, the proposed analytical model is well-suited for analyzing the static deflection of supported FG sandwich beams subjected to high mechanical loads, making it directly applicable to advanced engineering fields such as aerospace, automotive, and civil engineering, thereby enhancing the practicality of the research.
DoVTPhamVVNguyenHN. On the development of refined plate theory for static bending behavior of functionally graded plates. Math Probl Eng2020; 13: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2836763
SwaminathanKNaveenkumarDTZenkourAM, et al.Stress, vibration and buckling analyses of FGM plates—a state-of-the-art review. Compos Struct2015; 120: 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.070
6.
KumarPKumarDKaurK, et al.Investigation of aluminum metal matrix composite fabrication processes: a comparative review. Mater Phys Mech2024; 52(6): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.18149/MPM.5262024_13
7.
NamVHNamNHVinhPV, et al.A new efficient modified first-order shear model for static bending and vibration behaviors of two-layer composite plate. Adv Civ Eng2019; 7: 6814367. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6814367
8.
VinhPV. Analysis of bi-directional functionally graded sandwich plates via higher-order shear deformation theory and finite element method. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 24(2): 860–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362211025811
9.
AgarwalSAngraSSinghS. A review on the mechanical behaviour of aluminium matrix composites under high strain rate loading. Mater Phys Mech2023; 51(6): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18149/MPM.5162023_1
10.
KadoliRAkhtarKGanesanN. Static analysis of functionally graded beams using higher order shear deformation theory. Appl Math Model2008; 32: 2509–2525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.09.015
11.
LiuJHaoCZhouY, et al.Dynamic analysis of functionally graded sandwich beams using a semi-analytic method named scaled boundary finite element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem2021; 13: 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.05.010
12.
DemirhanPATaskinV. Levy solution for bending analysis of functionally graded sandwich plates based on four variable plate theory. Compos Struct2017; 177: 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.048
13.
Kadum NjimEBakhySHAl-WailyM. Analytical and numerical investigation of buckling load of functionally graded materials with porous metal of sandwich plate. Materials today: proceedings at science direct, 2021.
14.
ViolaERossettiLFantuzziN, et al.Static analysis of functionally graded conical shells and panels using the generalized unconstrained third order theory coupled with the stress recovery. Compos Struct2014; 112: 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.039
15.
FuTWuXXiaoZ, et al.Study on dynamic instability characteristics of functionally graded material sandwich conical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 151: 107438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107438
16.
Van VinhP. Static bending analysis of functionally graded sandwich beams using a novel mixed beam element based on first-order shear deformation theory. Forces in Mech. 2021; 4: 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmec.2021.100039
17.
ChikhA. Analysis of static behavior of a P-FGM Beam. J Mater Eng Struct. 2019; 6: 513–524.
18.
ThaiDNPhungVMCuongPH, et al. Bending of symmetric sandwich FGM beams with shear connectors. Math Probl Eng. 2021; 1: 7596300.
19.
RebaiBMansouriKChitourM, et al.Effect of idealization models on deflection of functionally graded material (FGM) plate. J Nano Electron Phys2023; 15(1): 01022(5pp). https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.15(1).01022
20.
BorovkovAIMaslovLBZhmayloMA, et al.Finite element analysis forprediction of femoral component strength in hip joint endoprosthesis made from meta-biomaterial. Mater Phys Mech2024; 52(6): 38–60. https://doi.org/10.18149/MPM.5262024_5
21.
BairamovKotzS. Dependence structure and symmetry of Huang-Kotz FGM distributions and their extensions. Metrika2002; 56(1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001840100158
22.
NguyenHNTanTCLuatDT, et al.Research on the buckling behavior of functionally graded plates with stiffeners based on the third-order shear deformation theory. Materials2019; 12: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081262
23.
BessaimAHouariMSAMegueniA, et al. Analyse statique de la flexion des poutres ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V en P-FGM. Nat Technol A: Sci Fondam Eng. 2013; 9: 28.
24.
BennaiRAit AtmaneHTounsiA. A new higher-order shear and normal deformation theory for functionally graded sandwich beams. Steel Compos Struct2015; 19(3): 521–546. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.3.521
25.
RabiaBDaouadjiTHAbderezakR. Effect of distribution shape of the porosity on the interfacial stresses of the FGM beam strengthened with FRP plate. Earthq Struct. 2019; 16(5): 601–609.
26.
DaouadjiTHBenferhatRAdimB. Bending analysis of an imperfect advanced composite plates resting on the elastic foundations. Coupled Syst Mech. 2016; 5(3): 269–283. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2016.5.3.269
27.
ChedadADaouadjiTHAbderezakR, et al.A high-order closed-form solution for interfacial stresses in externally sandwich FGM plated RC beams. Adv Mater Res2017; 6(4): 317–328.
28.
BelkacemATaharHDAbderrezakR, et al.Mechanical buckling analysis of hybrid laminated composite plates under different boundary conditions. Struct Eng Mech2018; 66(6): 761–769.
29.
KhelifaZHadjiLDaouadjiTH, et al.Buckling response with stretching effect of carbon nanotube-reinforced composite beams resting on elastic foundation. Struct Eng Mech2018; 67(2): 125–130.
30.
HenniMABDaouadjiTHAbbesB, et al.Analytical and numerical results for free vibration of laminated composites plates. Int J Civ Mech Eng2018; 12(6): 300–304.
31.
HadjiLDaouadjiTHBediaEA. Dynamic behavior of FGM beam using a new first shear deformation theory. Earthq and Struct. 2016; 10(2): 451–461. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.451
32.
AbdelhakZHadjiLKhelifaZ, et al.Analysis of buckling response of functionally graded sandwich plates using a refined shear deformation theory. Wind Struct2016; 22(3): 291–305. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.3.291
33.
LiXFWangBLHanJC. A higher-order theory for static and dynamic analyses of functionally graded beams. Arch Appl Mech2010; 80: 1197–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-010-0435-6
34.
KhadraouiFChitourMMansouriK, et al. Effect of material composition on bending analysis of functionally graded sandwich beams using a 2D refined hyperbolic theory (different types of sandwiches beams). Stud Eng Exact Sci. 2024; 5(2): 01–21. https://doi.org/10.54021/seesv5n2-731
35.
OsoferoAIVoTPThaiHT. Bending behavior of functionally graded sandwich beams using a Quasi-3D Hyperbolic shear deformation theory. Journal of Engineering Research2014; 19: 1–19.
36.
ChitourMRebaiBMansouriK, et al.Investigating the influence of material composition on bending analysis of functionally graded beams using a 2D refined theory. J Comput Appl Mech2024; 55(1): 62–76.
37.
TranTTNguyenNHDoTV, et al.Bending and thermal buckling of unsymmetric functionally graded sandwich beams in high-temperature environment based on a new third-order shear deformation theory. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23(3): 906–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636219849268
38.
ChitourMBouhadraABenguediabS, et al.Effect of phase contrast and geometrical parameters on bending behavior of sandwich beams with FG isotropic face sheets. J Nano Electron Phys2022; 14: 05016. https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.14(5).05016
39.
HimeurNMenasriaAChitourM, et al. Buckling and bending analysis of porous FG beam using a simple integral quasi-3D theory. J Appl Math Comput Mech. 2024; 23(4): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2024.4.03
