This study presents a general analytical solution for the stress state in a lap adhesive joint between two concentric tubes subjected to arbitrary, not necessarily axisymmetric, boundary conditions. The joined tubes are modelled as orthotropic cylindrical shells, and the proposed mathematical formulation encompasses many previously known results as particular cases. The problem is reduced to a system of six partial differential equations governing the axial, circumferential, and radial displacements of the inner and outer shells. By expanding the displacements into a trigonometric Fourier series in the circumferential coordinate, the problem is further transformed into a set of ordinary differential equations. As a specific case, an analytical solution is obtained for the first time for the stress state in a cylindrical joint under bending. A model problem is solved, and the resulting stress distributions are validated against finite element analysis, demonstrating the high accuracy of the proposed model.
ZhangYDuanMWangY, et al.Analytical study of the strength of adhesive joints of riser pipes. Ships Offshore Struct2015; 10: 545–553.
2.
BarkanovEBeschetnikovDLvovG. Effect of technological tensioning on the efficiency of reinforcement of pipelines with composite bands. Mech Compos Mater2015; 50: 725–732.
3.
KondratievAVKovalenkoVO. Optimization of design parameters of the main composite fairing of the launch vehicle under simultaneous force and thermal loading. Space Sci Technol2019; 25: 3–21.
4.
GagauzFKryvendaS. Preliminary design approach for lattice composite keel beam. In: NechyporukMPavlikovVKrytskyiD (eds). Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering - 2023. ICTM 2023. Lecture notes in networks and systems. Springer, 2024, vol 1008, pp. 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61415-6_26
5.
HuZVambolOSunS, et al. (2021). Development of a topology optimization method for the design of composite lattice ring structures. East Eur J Enterp Technol, 4(1(112)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238266
JägerMWartzackS. Strength analysis of structurally optimized aluminium-composite tubular lap joints. Proc Des Soc2022; 2: 2473–2482.
8.
KurennovSBarakhovKPolyakovO, et al.Application of genetic algorithm for double-lap adhesive joint design. Arch Mech Eng2023; 70(1): 27–42.
9.
KuriennovSSmetankinaNBarakhovK. Axisymmetric stress state of adhesive joint of a circular patch with a plate weakened by a circular cut-out. Period Polytech Mech Eng2023; 67(1): 12–18.
10.
DragoniEGoglioL. Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints – part I: critical review and finite element assessment of published models. Int J Adhesion Adhes2013; 47: 35–45.
11.
GomesCFFCampilhoRMoreiraR, et al.Adherend effect on the tensile behavior of tubular adhesive joints. Procedia Struct Integr2025; 72: 34–42.
12.
ChonCT. Analysis of tubular lap joint in torsion. J Compos Mater1982; 16(4): 268–284.
13.
HanJYuanH. Full debonding process of adhesively bonded composite and metallic pipe joints under torsion. Math Probl Eng2016; 2016: 1–13.
SelahiE. Elasticity solution of adhesive tubular joints in laminated composites with axial symmetry. Arch Mech Eng2018; 65(3): 441–456.
16.
AdamsRDPeppiattNA. Stress analysis of adhesive bonded tubular lap joints. J Adhes1977; 9(1): 1–18.
17.
GoglioLPaolinoDS. Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints—Part II: development of an explicit closed-form solution for the Lubkin and Reissner model. Int J Adhesion Adhes2014; 48: 35–42.
18.
KumarSScanlanJP. Stress analysis of shaft-tube bonded joints using a variational method. J Adhes2010; 86(4): 369–394.
da SilvaLFMdas NevesPJCAdamsRD, et al.Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part I: literature survey. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 319–330.
21.
FrostigYThomsenOTMortensenF. Analysis of adhesive-bonded joints, square-end, and spew-fillet—high-order theory approach. J Eng Mech1999; 125(11): 1298–1307.
22.
WangJZhangC. Three-parameter, elastic foundation model for analysis of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhesion Adhes2009; 29(5): 495–502.
23.
JiangWQiaoP. An improved four-parameter model with consideration of Poisson’s effect on stress analysis of adhesive joints. Eng Struct2015; 88: 203–215.
24.
KurennovSSBarakhovKPPoliakovAG. Stressed state of the axisymmetric adhesive joint of two cylindrical shells under axial tension. Mater Sci Forum2019; 968: 519–527.
25.
MathiasJDGrédiacMBalandraudX. On the bidirectional stress distribution in rectangular bonded composite patches. Int J Solid Struct2006; 43: 6921–6947.
26.
KurennovSS. An approximate two-dimensional model of adhesive joints. Analytical solution. Mech Compos Mater2014; 50(1): 105–114.
27.
KurennovSS. A simplified two-dimensional model of adhesive joints. Nonuniform load. Mech Compos Mater2015; 51(4): 479–488.
28.
RappP. Mechanics of adhesive joints as a plane problem of the theory of elasticity. Part II: displacement formulation for orthotropic adherends. Arch Civ Mech Eng2015; 15(2): 603–619.
29.
VigakVMTokovyiYV. Construction of elementary solutions to a plane elastic problem for a rectangular domain. Int Appl Mech2002; 38: 829–836.
30.
KurennovSBarakhovKDvoretskaD, et al.Stress state of two glued coaxial tubes under nonuniform axial load. In: NechyporukMPavlikovVKritskiyD (eds). Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering - 2020. ICTM 2020. Lecture notes in networks and systems. : Springer, 2021, vol 188, pp. 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66717-7_33
31.
YangCHuangHGuanZ. Stress model of composite pipe joints under bending. J Compos Mater2002; 36(11): 1331–1348.
32.
YangCGuanZ. Stress analysis of composite pipe joints under combined torsional and tensile loading. J Press Vessel Technol2009; 131(5): 051210.
33.
ZhangYChengNChengZ, et al.The debonding failure analysis of corroded pipes repaired with CFRP under tension and the bending moment. Int J Adhesion Adhes2020; 103: 102714.
34.
BaneaMDda SilvaLFM. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl2009; 223(1): 1–18.
35.
ZouGPShahinKTaheriF. An analytical solution for the analysis of symmetric composite adhesively bonded joints. Compos Struct2004; 65(3-4): 499–510.
36.
LuoQTongL. Analytical solutions for nonlinear analysis of composite single-lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhes2009; 29(2): 144–154.
37.
DobrzańskiPOleksiakW. Design and analysis methods for composite bonded joints. Transactions on aerospace research2021; 2021(1): 45–63.
38.
AmbartsumyanSA. General theory of anisotropic shells. Fizmatgiz, 1961, p. 384.
39.
AlibeiglooA. Three-dimensional static and free vibration analysis of laminated cylindrical panel with viscoelastic interfaces. J Compos Mater2014; 49(19): 2415–2430.
40.
ParoissienELachaudFSchwartzS. Modelling load transfer in single-lap adhesively bonded and hybrid (bolted/bonded) joints. Prog Aero Sci2022; 130: 100811.
41.
BarbosaDRCampilhoRDRochaRJ, et al.Experimental and numerical assessment of tensile loaded tubular adhesive joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl2018; 233(3): 452–464.
42.
TserpesKBarroso-CaroACarraroPA, et al.A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints. J Adhes2022; 98(12): 1855–1915.
43.
AdamsRD. Prediction of the strength of adhesive lap joints. An investigative review. Int J Adhes Adhes2024; 129: 103576.
44.
Watanabe JuniorMMReisJMLda Costa MattosHS. Polymer-based composite repair system for severely corroded circumferential welds in steel pipes. Eng Fail Anal2017; 81: 135–144.
45.
DuellJMWilsonJMKesslerMR. Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system. Int J Pres Ves Pip2008; 85(11): 782–788.
46.
AlabtahFGMahdiEEliyanFF. The use of fiber reinforced polymeric composites in pipelines: a review. Compos Struct2021; 276: 114595.
47.
KurennovSBarakhovKVambolO. Topological optimization BI-adhesive double lap adhesive joint. One-dimension model. Int J Adhesion Adhes2023; 126: 103474.
