Experimental and numerical investigation of the low-velocity impact behavior in foam-core sandwich panels with manufacturing-induced de-bonding defects using pulsed infrared thermography
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Experimental and numerical investigation of the low-velocity impact behavior in foam-core sandwich panels with manufacturing-induced de-bonding defects using pulsed infrared thermography
This study investigates the influence of manufacturing defects on the mechanical behavior of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) sandwich panels with a Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) foam core when subjected to low-velocity impact loading. Foam-core sandwich panels were made using the hand layup method with a stacking sequence of [(0/90)8/core/(0/90)8] and Teflon layers were inserted between the upper face and core to simulate de-bonding defects. Then, the sandwich panels were subjected to three levels of energy. Energy profile diagrams (EPDs) were plotted to determine the perforation thresholds of the sandwich panels. The non-destructive active pulsed infrared thermography evaluation method was employed for detecting damage in the sandwich panels before and after the drop weight impact test. In this study, simulations were conducted to demonstrate the accuracy of determining de-bonding defects and the low-velocity impact behavior of the sandwich panels. The experimental results from the drop weight tests showed that manufacturing defects affected the low-velocity impact behavior of the sandwich panels, and the experimental results from the active pulsed infrared thermography method showed that this method could identify the number and size of manufacturing defects with high accuracy. Furthermore, the results of the drop weight impact test simulation, such as peak force, were compared with experimental results. The results showed that manufacturing defects affected the low-velocity impact behavior of the sandwich panels.
ZhangYXuCLiuP, et al.Detection of debonding defects in honeycomb sandwich composite structures using low-power ultrasound excited thermography optimized by post-processing techniques. J Therm Anal Calorim2025; 150(5): 1–23.
2.
KhademiMPulipatiDPJackDA. Nondestructive inspection and quantification of select interface defects in honeycomb sandwich panels. Materials2024; 17: 2772.
3.
BirmanVKardomateasGA. Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures. Compos B Eng2018; 142: 221–240.
4.
LiuGGaoWLiuW, et al.Low-velocity impact damage detection in CFRP composites by applying long pulsed thermography based on post-processing techniques. Nondestr Test Eval2023; 39(7): 1946–1959.
5.
QingXLiaoYWangY, et al.Machine learning based quantitative damage monitoring of composite structure. Int J Smart Nano Mater2022; 13: 167–202.
6.
WangBZhongSLeeTL, et al.Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: a state-of-the-art review. Adv Mech Eng2020; 12: 168781402091376.
7.
AbrateS. Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev1997; 50: 69–82.
8.
FengDAymerichF. Damage prediction in composite sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2013; 52: 12–22.
9.
WangJWaasAMWangH. Experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-core sandwich panels. Compos Struct2013; 96(1): 298–311.
10.
LongSYaoXWangH, et al.Failure analysis and modeling of foam sandwich laminates under impact loading. Compos Struct2018; 197: 10–20.
11.
Abo SabahSHKuehABHBunnoriNM. Failure mode maps of bio-inspired sandwich beams under repeated low-velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol2019; 182: 107785.
12.
GuoKZhuLLiY, et al.Numerical study on mechanical behavior of foam core sandwich plates under repeated impact loadings. Compos Struct2019; 224: 111030.
13.
AnwarMMustaphaFAbdullahMN, et al.Defect detection of GFRP composites through long pulse thermography using an uncooled microbolometer infrared camera. Sensors2024; 24: 5225.
14.
BoccardiSCarlomagnoGMMeolaC, et al.The contribution of infrared thermography in the characterization of jute based composites. Compos Struct2018; 190: 119–126.
15.
AtasCSevimC. On the impact response of sandwich composites with cores of balsa wood and PVC foam. Compos Struct2010; 93(1): 40–48.
16.
LiYZhangWYangZ-W, et al.Low-velocity impact damage characterization of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) using infrared thermography. Infrared Phys Technol2016; 76: 91–102.
17.
VavilovVChulkovASmotrovA, et al.Characterizing impact damage in GFRP/CFRP composites by determining thermal effusivity/diffusivity. Meas Sci Technol2019; 30(3): 034003.
18.
WangFWangY-HLiuJ-Y, et al.Theoretical and experimental study on carbon/epoxy facings aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure using lock-in thermography. Measurement2018; 126: 110–119.
19.
Aidel Kadum JassimA-SRamazanKOkan O¨Z. Low-velocity impact response of sandwich composites with different foam core configurations. J Sandw Struct Mater2016; 0: 1–15.
20.
FengDAymerichF. Effect of core density on the low-velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich composite. Compos Struct2020; 239: 112–140.
21.
TaraghiIFereidoonA. Non-destructive evaluation of damage modes in nanocomposite foam-core sandwich panel subjected to low-velocity impact. Composites Part B2016; 103: 51–59.
22.
DoganAArıkanV. Low-velocity impact response of E-glass reinforced thermoset and thermoplastic based sandwich composites. Composites Part B2017; 127: 6–27.
23.
Ekanayake∗SGurramSSchmittRH. Depth determination of defects in CFRP structures using lock-in thermography. Composites Part B2018; 147: 128–134.
24.
WangZWanLZhuJ, et al.Evaluation of defect depth in CFRP composites by long pulse thermography. NDT E Int2022; 129: 102658.
25.
HeuerHSchulzeMAPoochM, et al.Review on quality assurance along the CFRP value chain–non-destructive testing of fabrics, preforms and CFRP by HF radio wave techniques. Compos B Eng2015; 77: 494–501.
26.
GholizadehS. A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Procedia Struct Integr2016; 1: 50–57.
27.
WuZTaoNZhangC, et al.Prediction of defect depth in GFRP composite by square-heating thermography. Infrared Phys Technol2023; 130: 104627.
28.
LopezFDe Paulo NicolauVIbarra-CastanedoC, et al.Thermal-numerical model and computational simulation of pulsed thermography inspection of carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Therm Sci2014; 86: 325–340.
29.
AvdelidisNPHawtinBCAlmondDP. Transient thermography in the assessment of defects of aircraft composites. NDT E Int2003; 36: 433–439.
30.
ChengLTianGY. Surface crack detection for carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials using pulsed eddy current thermography. IEEE Sens J2011; 11(12): 3261–3268.
31.
TaraghiIŁopatoPPaszkiewiczS, et al.State-of-the art non-destructive techniques for defects detection in nanocomposites foam-core sandwich panels containing carbon nanotubes: IR thermography and microwave imaging. Polym Test2019; 73: 352–358.
32.
HeWYaoLMengX, et al.Effect of structural parameters on low-velocity impact behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP face sheets. Thin-Walled Struct2019; 137: 411–432.
33.
MeolaCCarlomagnoGM. Impact damage in GFRP: new insights with infrared thermography. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41(12): 1839–1847.
34.
XieHFangHLiX, et al.Low-velocity impact damage detection and characterization in composite sandwich panels using infrared thermography. Compos Struct2021; 269: 114008.
35.
MeolaCCarlomagnoGM. Infrared thermography to evaluate impact damage in glass/epoxy with manufacturing defects. Int J Impact Eng2014; 67: 1–11.
36.
DeakTCziganyT. Chemical composition and mechanical properties of basalt and glass fibers: a comparison. Textil Res J2009; 79(7):645–651.
37.
HungYYChenYSNgSP, et al.Review and comparison of shearography and active thermography for nondestructive evaluation. Mater Sci Eng R Rep2009; 64(5-6): 73–112.
38.
SirikhamAZhaoYLiuH, et al.Three-dimensional subsurface defect shape reconstruction and visualisation by pulsed thermography. Infrared Phys Technol2020; 104: 103151.
39.
ShepardSMAhmedT. Characterization of active thermographic system performance. Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, pp. 388–392.
40.
ShokriehMMFakharMN. Experimental, analytical, and numerical studies of composite sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loadings. Mech Compos Mater2012; 47(6): 643–658.
41.
WenHMReddyTYReidSR, et al.Indentation, penetration and perforation of composite laminates and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading. Key Eng Mater1998; 141-143: 501–552.
42.
ChakravartyUMahfuzHSahaM, et al.Strain rate effects on sandwich core materials: an experimental and analytical investigation. Acta Mater2003; 51(5): 1469–1479.
43.
SahaMCMahfuzHChakravartyUK, et al.Effect of density, microstructure, and strain rate on compression behavior of polymeric foams. Materials Science and Engineering: A2005; 406(1-2): 328–336.
44.
GhadermaziKKhozeimehMATaheri-BehroozF, et al.Delamination detection in glass–epoxy composites using step-phase thermography (SPT). Infrared Phys Technol2015; 72: 204–209.
45.
GhasemiARHajmohammadMH. Multi-objective optimization of laminated composite shells for minimum mass/cost and maximum buckling pressure with failure criteria under external hydrostatic pressure. Struct Multidiscip Optim2017; 55: 1051–1062.
46.
AtasCLiuD. Impact response of woven composites with small weaving angles. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35(1): 80–97.
47.
AtasCSaymanO. An overall view on impact response of woven fabric composite plates. Compos Struct2008; 82(1): 336–345.
