In this study, the effects of seawater on the failure behavior of lap-jointed composite plates were investigated experimentally. Glass fiber/epoxy composite plates were bonded with epoxy-based adhesives using single- and double-face patches. The prepared specimens were kept in seawater at room temperature for 9, 12, 15, and 18 months. The failure loads of the seawater-soaked joints were determined by static tensile tests. In the experimental study, the effects of time variation, patch fiber reinforcement angle variation ([0°]8, [15°]8, [30°]8, [45°]8), and lap length variation (20 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm) on the joint strength were investigated. According to the results of the experimental study, the failure load decreased as the ageing time in seawater increased. The reduction ranged between 10.83%–33.49% for single-face connections and 4.08%–32.91% for double-face connections. Increasing the lap length increased the failure load by 33.37% to 108.03%. When the effect of patch fiber angle was examined, the highest increase was observed at [15°]8 patch with 17.98%.
VermaRShuklaMShuklaDK. Effect of glass fibre hybridization on the water absorption and thickness of alkali treated kenaf-epoxy composites. Mater Today Proc2021; 44(Part 1): 2093–2096.
CorreiaJRKellerTKnippersJ, et al.Design of fibre-polymer composite structures: commentary to European technical specification CEN/TS 19101:2022. CRC Press, 2025. in press.
4.
VidinhaHDurãesLNetoMA, et al.Understanding seawater-induced fatigue changes in glass/epoxy laminates: a SEM, EDS, and FTIR study. Polym Degrad Stabil2024; 224: 110752.
5.
CaldwellRLDaviesPArhantM, et al.Compression and hydrothermal ageing after impact of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2024; 184: 108258.
6.
DongSZhouPGuoR, et al.Durability study of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene sheet under simulated seawater sea sand concrete environment. J Mater Res Technol2022; 20: 1079–1092.
7.
ChenDLuXWangZ, et al.Durability test study of laminated specimens for large glass fiber protective structures in seawater. J Sea Res2024; 201: 102521.
8.
MouradAHIIdrisiAHZahoorA, et al.Experimental investigation of long-term performance of fiber-reinforced epoxy and polyurethane polymer composites. Polym Test2024; 132: 108359.
9.
ZhangXDengZ. Effects of seawater environment on the degradation of GFRP composites by molecular dynamics method. Polymers2022; 14: 2804.
10.
Osa-uwagboeNSilberschmidtVVBaxevanakisKP, et al.Effects of moisture absorption on penetration performance of FRP sandwich structures. Compos Struct2024; 344: 118319.
11.
BazliMBennyBRajabipourA, et al.Residual compressive strength of seawater sea sand concrete filled hybrid carbon-glass fibre reinforced polymer tubes under seawater: effects of fibre type and orientation. J Build Eng2023; 70: 106383.
12.
DaviesPArhantMGrossmannE. Seawater ageing of infused flax fibre reinforced acrylic composites. Compos. Part C Open Access2022; 8: 100246.
13.
Al-ZahraniMM. Durability of concrete-embedded GFRP bars after 20 years of tidal zone exposure: correlation with accelerated aging tests. Case Stud Constr Mater2024; 21: e03435.
14.
KootsookosAMouritzAP. Seawater durability of glass- and carbon-polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 1503–1511.
15.
ZamriMHAkilHMBakarAA, et al.Effect of water absorption on pultruded jute/glass fiber-reinforced unsaturated polyester hybrid composites. J Compos Mater2011; 46(1): 51–61.
16.
GuH. Behaviours of glass fibre/unsaturated polyester composites under seawater environment. Mater Des2009; 30: 1337–1340.
17.
MagiMV HubballiBLakkamK, et al.A review on effect of saline water on adhesive joints of composites. (2022). [Online]. Available. https://www.ijser.org
18.
BorsellinoCUrsoSAlderucciT, et al.Temperature effects on failure mode of double lap glass-aluminum and glass-GFRP joints with epoxy and acrylic adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes2021; 105: 102788.
19.
ZhuDYaoMRahmanMZ, et al.Effects of temperature and loading rate on the shear performance of GFRP-steel single-lap joints. Case Stud Constr Mater2024; 21: e03756.
20.
BaneaMDSilvaLFMCampilhoRDSG. Effect of temperature on the shear strength of aluminum single lap bonded joints for high temperature applications. J Adhes Sci Technol2014; 28: 1367–1381.
21.
TuranK. Thermal aging effect on the failure loads of adhesively strap joints. J Compos Mater2019; 53(26–27): 3701–3713.
22.
NiuRYangYLiuZ, et al.Durability of two epoxy adhesive BFRP joints Dipped in seawater under high temperature environment. Polym2023; 15(15): 3232.
23.
Fry-TaylorRMengMWangX. Marine environmental effects on a graphene reinforced epoxy adhered single lap joint between metals and CFRP. Int J Adhes Adhes2023; 125: 103423.
24.
MaDLiuJWangL, et al.Assessment of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)–Concrete interface durability subjected to simulated seawater environment. Build2024; 14(6): 1732.
25.
HanXCrocombeADAnwarSNR, et al.The strength prediction of adhesive single lap joints exposed to long term loading in a hostile environment. Int J Adhesion Adhes2014; 55: 1–11.
26.
DaviesPLe JeuneS. Influence of seawater immersion on acrylic adhesive properties and bond strength on wet composites. Int J Adhes Adhes2024; 132: 103712.
AtakokGMertgenc YoldasD. Comparison of GFRP (glass fiber-reinforced polymer) and CFRP (carbon fiber-reinforced polymer) composite adhesive-bonded single-lap joints used in marine environments. Sustainability2024; 16(24): 11105.
29.
NguyenTCBaiYZhaoXL, et al.Durability of steel/CFRP double strap joints exposed to sea water, cyclic temperature and humidity. Compos Struct2012; 94: 1834–1845.
30.
BelliniCParodoGSorrentinoL. Effect of operating temperature on aged single lap bonded joints. Def Technol2020; 16(2): 283–289.
31.
ÖrҫenGKoyunE. Failure behavior of single-strap lap (SSL) and double-strap lap (DSL) composites—with adhesive joints and different fiber reinforcement angles under hydrothermal conditions. Iran Polym J (Engl Ed)2023; 32(6): 749–762.
32.
Adhesives — Determination of tensile lap-shear strength of rigid-to-rigid bonded assemblies. (2021). ISO.
33.
Test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading. (2019). ASTM. https://doi.org/10.1520/d1002-10r19
34.
NguyenTBaiYZhaoXL, et al.Mechanical characterization of steel/CFRP double strap joints at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct2011; 93: 1604–1612.
35.
Paints and varnishes — performance requirements for protective paint systems for offshore and related structures. (2009). ISO.
YipCLSugimanSChinD, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of adhesively bonded kfrp/steel double strap joints incorporating eggshell powder-toughened epoxy adhesive. Case Stud Constr Mater2024; 20: e02790.
39.
HuJKangRFangJ, et al.An experimental and parametrical study on repair of cracked titanium airframe structures with single-side bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer prepreg patches. Compos Struct2024; 338: 118102.
40.
MottaghianFTaheriF. Performance of a unique fiber-reinforced foam-cored metal sandwich system joined with adhesively bonded CFRP straps under compressive and tensile loadings. Appl Compos Mater2023; 30(2): 339–359.
41.
KumarVSharmaSSinghA. Impact of joint variables on shear and fatigue behavior of composite-metal single-lap adhesive joint. Eng Fail Anal2025; 168: 109079.
42.
YangMXiJXuanH, et al.Mechanical behavior and failure mechanism study of CFRP laminate page-type adhesive joint. Eng Fract Mech2025; 316: 110895.
43.
AbdallaAMAElmoghazyYHSarkonGK, et al.Exploring the impact of graphene nanoplatelets on adhesive mechanical strength: a comprehensive investigation into single-lap joint elastoplastic behavior via cohesive zone method. Int J Adhes Adhes2025; 138: 103908.
44.
Fernández-CañadasLMIvañezISanchez-SaezS, et al.Effect of adhesive thickness and overlap on the behavior of composite single-lap joints. Mech Adv Mater Struct2021; 28(11): 1111–1120.
45.
MohamedBKhaoulaALeilaB. Effect of the fibers orientation of the different types of composite plates notched of U-shape repaired by composite patch. Mat Res2023; 26: e20220302.
46.
AsanAMKamanMODagS, et al.Effects of translaminar edge crack and fiber angle on fracture toughness and crack propagation behaviors of laminated carbon fiber composites. Int J Mater Res2024; 115(6): 446–462.
47.
LiuXHeYQiuD, et al.Numerical optimizing and experimental evaluation of stepwise rapid high-pressure microwave curing carbon fiber/epoxy composite repair patch. Compos Struct2019; 230: 111529.
48.
SadeghiAMahshidRHeidari-RaraniM, et al.Effect of lamina fiber orientation interfaced with semi-flexible adhesive layer on strength and failure mode of composite single-lap joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2022; 118: 103232.
49.
GrefeHKandulaMWDilgerK. Influence of the fibre orientation on the lap shear strength and fracture behaviour of adhesively bonded composite metal joints at high strain rates. Int J Adhes Adhes2020; 97: 102486.
50.
SousaJCorreiaJGonilhaJ, et al.Durability of adhesively bonded joints between pultruded GFRP adherends under hygrothermal and natural ageing. Compos Part B Eng2018; 158: 475–488.
51.
HussnainSShahSMegat-YusoffP, et al.Degradation and mechanical performance of fibre-reinforced polymer composites under marine environments: a review of recent advancements. Polym Degrad Stabil2023; 215: 110452.
52.
CherninLGuobysRVilnayM. Factors affecting the procedure for testing cavitation erosion of GFRP composites using an ultrasonic transducer. Wear2023; 530–531: 205059.
53.
NiuRYangYLinY, et al.Failure study of BFRP joints with two epoxy adhesives under hygrothermal coupling. Polymers2023; 15(19): 3949.
54.
ZhengGHeZWangK, et al.On failure mechanisms in CFRP/Al adhesive joints after hygrothermal aging degradation following by mechanical tests. Thin-Walled Struct2021; 158: 107184.
55.
MuWLXuQHNaJ, et al.Investigating the failure behavior of hygrothermally aged adhesively bonded CFRP-aluminum alloy joints using modified Arcan fixture. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 182: 110303.
56.
de QueirozHFMBaneaMDCavalcantiDKK. Adhesively bonded joints of jute, glass and hybrid jute/glass fibre-reinforced polymer composites for automotive industry. Appl Adhes Sci2021; 9(1): 2–14.
57.
MeleseKGNaikTPSinghI. Adhesive joining of sisal/jute/hybrid composites with drilled holes in lap area. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2021; 235(2): 255–264.
58.
ÖztürkFHMarquesEASCarbasRJC, et al.Experimental and numerical study on mechanical behavior of 3D printed adhesive joints with polycarbonate substrates. J Appl Polym Sci2024; 141(29): e55657.
59.
KatsivalisIThomsenOTFeihS, et al.Strength evaluation and failure prediction of bolted and adhesive glass/steel joints. Glass Struct Eng2018; 3(2): 183–196.
60.
CarbasRJCMarquesEASda SilvaLFM. The influence of epoxy adhesive toughness on the strength of hybrid laminate adhesive joints. Appl Adhes Sci2021; 9(1): 1–14.
61.
Asgari MehrabadiF. Experimental and numerical failure analysis of adhesive composite joints. Int J Aerosp Eng2012; 2012: 1–10.
62.
JeeviGNayakSKAbdul KaderM. Review on adhesive joints and their application in hybrid composite structures. J Adhes Sci Technol2019; 33(14): 1497–1520.
63.
Ganesh Gupta KBNVSHiremathMMFulmaliAO, et al.Investigation of adhesively bonded multi-material joints: an assessment on joint efficiency and fracture morphology. Mater Today Proc2020; 27: 1180–1185.
64.
OmaireySJayasreeNKazilasM. Defects and uncertainties of adhesively bonded composite joints. SN Appl Sci2021; 3(9): 769.
65.
HeshmatiMHaghaniRAl-EmraniM. Durability of bonded FRP-to-steel joints: effects of moisture, de-icing salt solution, temperature and FRP type. Compos Part B Eng2017; 119: 153–167.
