Modern polymer bonded explosives (PBX) are often characterized by a sensitive response to external thermomechanical insult that in some cases lead to accidental detonation. Current strategies for desensitizing PBXs come at the expense of a significant reduction in performance. A possible method for desensitizing PBX without adverse performance effects is the multifunctional tailoring of mechanical properties through strategic incorporation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) directly into the binder phase. In this work, a fabrication method is presented that produces polymer bonded simulants (PBS) of PBX that incorporate MWCNTs into the binder phase, hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB). These materials were characterized via microscopy and unconfined quasi-static compression testing to determine the effects of MWCNTs. Quasi-static compression showed evidence of a MWCNT induced structural skeleton effect that provided the binder with an increased strength, load transfer, and a greater ability to resist strain localizations prior to failure. These enhancements demonstrate the potential of using MWCNTs to enhance energetic materials.
MeyersMA.Dynamic behavior of materials.
New York:
John Wiley, 1994.
2.
YanQ-LZemanS.Theoretical evaluation of sensitivity and thermal stability for high explosives based on quantum chemistry methods: a brief review. Int J Quantum Chem2013;
113: 1049–1061.
3.
ShuklaMKBodduVMSteevensJA, et al. Energetic materials: from cradle to grave, vol. 25. Cham: Springer, 2017.
4.
TarverCMChidesterSKNicholsAL.Critical conditions for impact-and shock-induced hot spots in solid explosives. J Phys Chem1996;
100: 5794–5799.
5.
BaruaAKimSHorieY, et al.
Ignition criterion for heterogeneous energetic materials based on hotspot size-temperature threshold. J Appl Phys2013;
113: 064906.
6.
FieldJESwalloweGMHeavensSN.Ignition mechanisms of explosives during mechanical deformation. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1982;
382: 231–244.
7.
Yıldırım HCÖzüpekŞ.Structural assessment of a solid propellant rocket motor: effects of aging and damage. Aerosp Sci Technol2011;
15: 635–641.
8.
KeshavarzMH.Simple correlation for predicting detonation velocity of ideal and non-ideal explosives. J Hazard Mater2009;
166: 762–769.
9.
SikderAKSikderN.A review of advanced high performance, insensitive and thermally stable energetic materials emerging for military and space applications. J Hazard Mater2004;
112: 1–15.
10.
AgrawalJP.Recent trends in high-energy materials. Prog Energy Combust Sci1998;
24: 1–30.
11.
HobbsMLBaerMR. Calibrating the bkw-eos with a large product species data base and measured cj properties. In: Tenth symposium (international) on detonation, Boston, MA, 1993.
12.
FieldJEBourneNKPalmerSJP, et al.
Hot-spot ignition mechanisms for explosives and propellants. Philoso Trans R Soc Lond Series A: Phys Eng Sci1992;
339: 269–283.
13.
WinterREJohnEF.The role of localized plastic flow in the impact initiation of explosives. Proc R Soc Lond A. Math Phys Sci1975;
343: 399–413.
ElbeihAZemanSJungováM, et al.
Attractive nitramines and related pbxs. Propell Explosiv Pyrotech2013;
38: 379–385.
16.
CzerskiHProudWG.Relationship between the morphology of granular cyclotrimethylene-trinitramine and its shock sensitivity. J Appl Phys2007;
102: 113515.
17.
KimSHorieYZhouM.Ignition desensitization of pbx via aluminization. Metall Mat Trans A2015;
46: 4578–4586.
18.
YouSChenMWDlottDD, et al.
Ultrasonic hammer produces hot spots in solids. Nat Commun2015;
6: 6581.
19.
DeFisherSPfauDDykaC. Insensitive munitions modeling improvement efforts. Technical report, Army Armament R
esearch Development and Engineering Center Picatinny Arsenal, NJ, 2010.
20.
WalleySMFieldJEGreenawayMW.Crystal sensitivities of energetic materials. Mater Sci Technol2006;
22: 402–413.
21.
SpitzerDCometMBarasC, et al.
Energetic nano-materials: opportunities for enhanced performances. J Phys Chem Solids2010;
71: 100–108.
MittalGDhandVRheeKY, et al.
A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Industr Eng Chem2015;
21: 11–25.
24.
ZhuJKimJDPengH, et al.
Improving the dispersion and integration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in epoxy composites through functionalization. Nano Lett2003;
3: 1107–1113.
25.
TessemaAZhaoDMollJ, et al.
Effect of filler loading, geometry, dispersion and temperature on thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites. Polym Test2017;
57: 101–106.
26.
GojnyFHWichmannMHGKopkeU, et al.
Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol2004;
64: 2363–2371.
27.
DavisDCWilkersonJWZhuJ, et al.
Improvements in mechanical properties of a carbon fiber epoxy composite using nanotube science and technology. Compos Struct2010;
92: 2653–2662.
28.
ZhuJPengHRodriguez-MaciasF, et al.
Reinforcing epoxy polymer composites through covalent integration of functionalized nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater2004;
14: 643–648.
29.
XinFLiL.Decoration of carbon nanotubes with silver nanoparticles for advanced cnt/polymer nanocomposites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact2011;
42: 961–967.
30.
ThostensonETChouT-W.Aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced composites: processing and mechanical characterization. J Phys D Appl Phys2002;
35: L77–L80.
31.
CadyCMBlumenthalWRGrayGT, et al.
Mechanical properties of plastic-bonded explosive binder materials as a function of strain-rate and temperature. Polym Eng Sci2006;
46: 812–819.
32.
GrayGBlumenthalWIdarD, et al. Influence of temperature on the high-strain-rate mechanical behavior of pbx
9501. AIP conference proceedings, 1998, pp. 583–586.
33.
Liu CCarlMC, Rae PJ, et al. On the quantitative measurement of fracture toughness in high explosive and mock materials. Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2010.
34.
Van RamshorstMCDi BenedettoGLDuvaloisW, et al.
Investigation of the failure mechanism of htpb/ap/al propellant by in-situ uniaxial tensile experimentation in sem. Prop, Explos, Pyrotech2016;
41: 700–708.
35.
RaePJGoldreinHTPalmerSJP, et al.
Quasi-static studies of the deformation and failure of β–hmx based polymer bonded explosives. Proc R Soc Lond A2002;
458: 743–762.
36.
SiviourCRLaityPRProudWG, et al.
High strain rate properties of a polymer-bonded sugar: their dependence on applied and internal constraints. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2008;
464: 1229–1255.
37.
WilliamsonDMSiviourCRProudWG, et al.
Temperature-time response of a polymer bonded explosive in compression (edc37). J Phys D Appl Phys2008;
41: 085404.
38.
MannerVWYeagerJDPattersonBM, et al.
In situ imaging during compression of plastic bonded explosives for damage modeling. Materials2017;
10: 638.
39.
SengezerECSeidelGD. Application of piezoresistive nanocomposite binders for real time embedded sensing of strain and damage in energetic materials. In: 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference,2017, p. 0122.
40.
ShirodkarNRockerSSeidelGD.Strain and damage sensing of polymer bonded mock energetics via piezoresistivity from carbon nanotube networks. SMART Mater Struct2019;
28: 104006.
41.
ShirodkarNRockerS, andSeidelGD. Structural health monitoring of solid rocket propellants using piezoresistive properties of dispersed carbon nano-tube sensing networks. In: Smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, vol. 51944, p. V001T01A022. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018.
42.
Sengezer EC and Seidel GD. Real time in-situ sensing of damage evolution in nanocomposite bonded surrogate energetic materials. In Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional Materials and Composites 2016, 18 April 2016 (Vol. 9800, p. 98000X). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
43.
Rocker SN, Pearrell TW, Sengezer EC and Seidel GD. Thermo-Electromechanical Response of Polymer-Bonded Explosives for Structural Health Monitoring of Energetic Materials. In Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, 18 September 2017, (Vol. 58257, p. V001T01A009). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
44.
SengezerECSeidelGD.Structural health monitoring of nanocomposite bonded energetic materials through piezoresistive response. AIAA J2018;
56: 1225–1238.
45.
Sengezer EC and Seidel GD. In-Situ Sensing of Deformation and Damage in Nanocomposite Bonded Surrogate Energetic Materials. In Mechanics of Composite and Multi-functional Materials, Vol. 7, pp. 193–201. Springer, Cham, 2017.
46.
YeagerJDHigginbotham DuqueALShortyM, et al.
Development of inert density mock materials for hmx. J Energet Mater2018;
36: 253–265.
47.
DanielMA. Polyurethane binder systems for polymer bonded explosives. Report, Defence Science and Technology Organisation Edinburgh (Australia) Weapons, 2006.
48.
MuthiahRMKrishnamurthyVNGuptaBR.Rheology of htpb propellant. i. Effect of solid loading, oxidizer particle size, and aluminum content. J Appl Polym Sci1992;
44: 2043–2052.
49.
WingborgN.Increasing the tensile strength of htpb with different isocyanates and chain extenders. Polym Test2002;
21: 283–287.
50.
MinouraYYamashitaSOkamotoH, et al.
Crosslinking and mechanical property of liquid rubber. i. Curative effect of aliphatic diols. J Appl Polym Sci1978;
22: 1817–1844.
51.
SiegmannACohenDNarkisM.Polyurethane elastomers containing polybutadiene and aliphatic diols: structure-property relationships. Polym Eng Sci1987;
27: 1187–1194.
52.
BaerMR.Modeling heterogeneous energetic materials at the mesoscale. Thermochimica Acta2002;
384: 351–367.
53.
BarberoEJ.Introduction to composite materials design.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press, 2017.
54.
HanZFinaA.Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: a review. Prog Polym Sci2011;
36: 914–944.
55.
ZhaoSSongZCuiJ, et al.
Improving dispersion and integration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in epoxy composites by using a reactive noncovalent dispersant. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem2012;
50: 4548–4556.
56.
Ravindran S and Kidane A. Meso-scale deformation behavior of polymer bonded energetic material under quasi-static compression. In Mechanics of Composite and Multi-functional Materials, Vol. 7, pp. 345–350. Springer, Cham, 2016.
57.
QinJGLinYLLuFY, et al. Experimental study on dynamic mechanical properties of a mock pbx. In: Dynamic behavior of materials, Vol. 1, Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, 2013, pp. 489–497.
58.
ASTM Committee D-20 on Plastics. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2004.
59.
AkikiMGallagherTPMenonS.Mechanistic approach for simulating hot-spot formations and detonation in polymer-bonded explosives. AIAA J2017;
55: 585–598.
60.
TaoKYangSGrunlanJC, et al.
Effects of carbon nanotube fillers on the curing processes of epoxy resin-based composites. J Appl Polym Sci2006;
102: 5248–5254.
61.
LiYWangSWangQ, et al.
Enhancement of fracture properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes: a molecular dynamics study. Carbon2018;
129: 504–509.
