This articles reviews till-date available literature on metal matrix composites reinforced with graphene, CNT and other carbonaceous materials. The article has a special focus on the mechanical, tribological and challenges associated with the fabrication of nanocomposites. Simultaneously, it reviews the synthesis, strengthening mechanism and applications of graphene along with research gap associated with graphene metal matrix nanocomposites (GMMNC). Carbonaceous nanofillers, e.g. Graphene, are known to have extraordinary mechanical, thermal and electrical properties along with multifaceted characteristics. These materials have the potential to become an ideal material in numerous application which requires reinforcement. Graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) suffers various challenges starting from its synthesis to the uniform distribution within the matrix material. Our concern is to give details on the challenges associated with graphene and metal matrix composites along with the solution so that new research can be done at its ease. Section 1 of the article gives a detailed analysis of various carbonaceous reinforcement materials. Preparation, processing and dispersion technique for graphene and composite material is given in section 2. Section 3 of the article deals with different matrix material used in MMNC along with the properties and challenges associated with it in tabulated form. Strengthening mechanism used for the enhancement of mechanical properties of composites is described in section 4, whereas, Section 5 deals with the applications and Research gap.
DursunTSoutisC.Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater Des2014;
56: 862–871.
5.
DuttonSKellyDBakerA. Composite materials for aircraft structures. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004, pp. 200–300.
6.
SlaytonRSpinardiG.Radical innovation in scaling up: Boeing’s dreamliner and the challenge of socio-technical transitions. Technovation2016;
47: 47–58.
7.
BolotinKISikesKJJiangZ, et al.
Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene.Solid State Commun2008;
146: 351–355.
8.
BerryV.Impermeability of graphene and its applications.Carbon2013;
62: 1–10.
9.
MoradiOGuptaVKAgarwalS, et al.
Characteristics and electrical conductivity of graphene and graphene oxide for adsorption of cationic dyes from liquids: kinetic and thermodynamic study. J Ind Eng Chem2015;
28: 294–301.
10.
AroraRBMadanBRPathakRK, et al.
Procaine amide and quinidine in experimental auricular arrhythmias simulating clinical disorders. Indian J Med Res1956;
44: 453–462.
11.
MazilovaTISadanovEVMikhailovskijIM.Tensile strength of graphene nanoribbons: an experimental approach. Mater Lett2019;
242: 17–19.
12.
LiuJKhanUColemanJ, et al.
Graphene oxide and graphene nanosheet reinforced aluminium matrix composites: powder synthesis and prepared composite characteristics. Mater Des2016;
94: 87–94.
13.
PengQLiYHeX, et al.
Interfacial enhancement of carbon fiber composites by poly(amido amine) functionalization. Compos Sci Technol2013;
74: 37–42.
14.
HeHWangJLiK, et al.
Mixed resin and carbon fibres surface treatment for preparation of carbon fibres composites with good interfacial bonding strength. Mater Des2010;
31: 4631–4637.
15.
LiBZhongWH.Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J Mater Sci2011;
46: 5595–5614.
16.
YanSJJDaiSLLZhangXYY, et al.
Investigating aluminum alloy reinforced by graphene nanoflakes. Mater Sci Eng A2014;
612: 440–444.
17.
LiJLXiongYCWangXD, et al.
Microstructure and tensile properties of bulk nanostructured aluminum/graphene composites prepared via cryomilling. Mater Sci Eng A2015;
626: 400–405.
GaoXYueHGuoE, et al.
Preparation and tensile properties of homogeneously dispersed graphene reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Des2016;
94: 54–60.
20.
VarolTCanakciA.Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline Al 2024–B 4 C composite powders by mechanical alloying. Philos Mag Lett2013;
93: 339–345.
21.
SchiøtzJDi TollaFDJacobsenKW.Softening of nanocrystalline metals at very small grain sizes. Nature1998;
391: 561–563.
22.
NietoABishtALahiriD, et al.
Graphene reinforced metal and ceramic matrix composites: a review. Int Mater Rev2017;
62: 241–302.
23.
Dorri MoghadamAOmraniEMenezesPL, et al.
Mechanical and tribological properties of self-lubricating metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene—a review. Compos Part B Eng2015;
77: 402–420.
RanjanRSinghNKJaiswalAP, et al.
Metal matrix nano composites using graphene nano platelets indented on copper particles in aluminium matrix. AML2018;
9: 652–655.
26.
IijimaS.Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature1991;
354: 56–58.
27.
Dorri MoghadamASchultzBFFergusonJB, et al.
Functional metal matrix composites: self-lubricating, self-healing, and nanocomposites—an outlook. Jom2014;
66: 872–881.
28.
MaksimkinAVKaloshkinSDKaloshkinaMS, et al.
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes: fabrication method and properties. J Alloys Compd2012;
536: S538–S540.
29.
BakshiSRKeshriAKAgarwalA.A comparison of mechanical and wear properties of plasma sprayed carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites at nano and macro scale. Mater Sci Eng A2011;
528: 3375–3384.
30.
XuRTanZXiongD, et al.
Balanced strength and ductility in CNT/Al composites achieved by flake powder metallurgy via shift-speed ball milling. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2017;
96: 57–66.
31.
EsawiAMKMorsiKSayedA, et al.
Fabrication and properties of dispersed carbon nanotube–aluminum composites. Mater Sci Eng A2009;
508: 167–173.
32.
YangXZouTShiC, et al.
Effect of carbon nanotube (CNT) content on the properties of in-situ synthesis CNT reinforced Al composites. Mater Sci Eng A2016;
660: 11–18.
33.
DuZTanMJGuoJF, et al.
Fabrication of a new Al-Al2O3-CNTs composite using friction stir processing (FSP). Mater Sci Eng A2016;
667: 125–131.
34.
HosseiniSARanjbarKDehmolaeiR, et al.
Fabrication of Al5083 surface composites reinforced by CNTs and cerium oxide nano particles via friction stir processing. J Alloys Compd2015;
622: 725–733.
35.
HuQZhaoHLiF.Microstructures and properties of SiC particles reinforced aluminum-matrix composites fabricated by vacuum-assisted high pressure die casting. Mater Sci Eng A2017;
680: 270–277.
36.
EshraghiNCaesSMahmoudA, et al.
Sodium vanadium (III) fluorophosphate/carbon nanotubes composite (NVPF/CNT) prepared by spray-drying: good electrochemical performance thanks to well-dispersed CNT network within NVPF particles. Electrochim Acta2017;
228: 319–324.
37.
PialagoEJTKwonOKKimM-S, et al.
Ternary Cu–CNT–AlN composite coatings consolidated by cold spray deposition of mechanically alloyed powders. J Alloys Compd2015;
650: 199–209.
38.
JoIChoSKimH, et al.
Titanium dioxide coated carbon nanofibers as a promising reinforcement in aluminum matrix composites fabricated by liquid pressing process. Scr Mater2016;
112: 87–91.
39.
NajimiAAShahverdiHR.Effect of milling methods on microstructures and mechanical properties of Al6061-CNT composite fabricated by spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2017;
702: 87–95.
40.
ChenBShenJYeX, et al.
Solid-state interfacial reaction and load transfer efficiency in carbon nanotubes (CNTs)-reinforced aluminum matrix composites.Carbon2017;
114: 198–208.
41.
CarvalhoOMirandaGSoaresD, et al.
CNT-reinforced aluminum composites: processing and mechanical properties. Cienc e Tecnol dos Mater2013;
25: 75–78.
42.
JiangLLiZFanG, et al.
The use of flake powder metallurgy to produce carbon nanotube (CNT)/aluminum composites with a homogenous CNT distribution.Carbon2012;
50: 1993–1998.
43.
YazdanieNMahoodM.Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent1985;
54: 543–547.
44.
LiuHTYangLWSunX, et al.
Enhancing the fracture resistance of carbon fiber reinforced SiC matrix composites by interface modification through a simple fiber heat-treatment process.Carbon2016;
109: 435–443.
45.
DekaBKHazarikaAKongK, et al.
Interfacial resistive heating and mechanical properties of graphene oxide assisted CuO nanoparticles in woven carbon fiber/polyester. Composite Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016;
80: 159–170.
46.
DaoudA.Microstructure and tensile properties of 2014 Al alloy reinforced with continuous carbon fibers manufactured by gas pressure infiltration. Mater Sci Eng A2005;
391: 114–120.
47.
YangQLiuJLiS, et al.
Fabrication and mechanical properties of Cu-coated woven carbon fibers reinforced aluminum alloy composite. Mater Des2014;
57: 442–448.
48.
AbidinAZKozeraRHöhnM, et al.
Preparation and characterization of CVD-TiN-Coated carbon fibers for applications in metal matrix composites. Thin Solid Films2015;
589: 479–486.
49.
ZhangJLiuSLuY, et al.
Semisolid-rolling and annealing process of woven carbon fibers reinforced Al-matrix composites. J Mater Sci Technol2017;
33: 623–629.
50.
AlhashmyHANganbeM.Laminate squeeze casting of carbon fiber reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Des2015;
67: 154–158.
51.
ZhangJLiuSZhangY, et al.
Fabrication of woven carbon fibers reinforced Al–Mg (95–5wt%) matrix composites by an electromagnetic casting. J Mater Process Technol2015;
226: 78–84.
52.
Prashantha KumarHGAnthony XaviorM.Graphene reinforced metal matrix composite (GRMMC): a review. Procedia Eng2014;
97: 1033–1040.
MohanVBLauKHuiD, et al.
Graphene-based materials and their composites: a review on production, applications and product limitations. Compos Part B Eng2018;
142: 200–220.
58.
IniewskiKMorrisJ.Graphene carbon nanotubes, and nanostructures: techniques and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016.
MalicEKnorrA.Graphene and carbon nanotubes: ultrafast relaxation dynamics and optics.
New York:
Wiley, 2013.
61.
BergerCSongZLiT, et al.
Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2D electron gas properties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectronics. J Phys Chem B2004;
108: 19912–19916.
62.
NovoselovKSGeimAKMorozovSV, et al.
Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science2004;
306: 666–669.
63.
RanjanRRaiRSBajpaiV.A novel approach to synthesize nitrogen-doped graphene in aspects of milling energy. Diam Relat Mater2020;
110: 108116.
64.
MuzykaRKwokaMSmędowskiŁ, et al.
Oxidation of graphite by different modified hummers methods. New Carbon Mater2017;
32: 15–20.
65.
RathnayakeRMNMWijayasingheHPitawalaH, et al.
Synthesis of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide by needle platy natural vein graphite. Appl Surf Sci2017;
393: 309–315.
66.
WeiDLiuYWangY, et al.
Synthesis of N-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties. Nano Lett2009;
9: 1752–1758.
67.
ReinaAJiaXHoJ, et al.
Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett2009;
9: 30–35.
68.
MoriFKubouchiMAraoY.Effect of graphite structures on the productivity and quality of few-layer graphene in liquid-phase exfoliation. J Mater Sci2018;
53: 12807–12815.
69.
FrankIWTanenbaumDMvan der ZandeAM, et al.
Mechanical properties of suspended graphene sheets. J Vac Sci Technol B2007;
25: 2558.
70.
DawidczykTJKongHKatzHE. Organic semiconductors (OSCs) for electronic chemical sensors. In: Handbook of organic materials for optical and (opto)electronic devices: Properties and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013, pp. 577–596.
WeiYSunZ.Liquid-Phase exfoliation of graphite for mass production of pristine few-layer graphene. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci2015;
20: 311–321.
74.
RavulaSBakerSNKamathG, et al.
Ionic liquid-assisted exfoliation and dispersion: stripping graphene and its two-dimensional layered inorganic counterparts of their inhibitions. Nanoscale2015;
7: 4338–4353.
75.
LotyaMHernandezYKingPJ, et al.
Liquid phase production of graphene by exfoliation of graphite in surfactant/water solutions. J Am Chem Soc2009;
131: 3611–3620.
76.
GongPWangZWangJ, et al.
One-pot sonochemical preparation of fluorographene and selective tuning of its fluorine coverage. J Mater Chem2012;
22: 16950–16956.
77.
KingPCrossleyABackesC, et al.
Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids. Nature Mater2014;
13: 624–630.
78.
KaragiannidisPGHodgeSALombardiL, et al.
Microfluidization of graphite and formulation of graphene-based conductive inks. ACS Nano2017;
11: 2742–2755.
PlessetMSProsperettiA.Bubble dynamics and cavitation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1977;
9: 145–185.
82.
DoktyczSJSuslickKS.Interparticle collisions driven by ultrasound. Science1990;
247: 1067–1069.
83.
PokhrelNVabbinaPKPalaN.Sonochemistry: science and engineering. Ultrason Sonochem2016;
29: 104–128.
84.
LeiFYangMJiangF, et al.
Microwave-assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphite fluoride into fluorographene. Chem Eng J2019;
360: 673–679.
85.
XuJDangDKTranVT, et al.
Liquid-phase exfoliation of graphene in organic solvents with addition of naphthalene. J Colloid Interface Sci2014;
418: 37–42.
86.
HadiAZahirifarJKarimi-SabetJ, et al.
Graphene nanosheets preparation using magnetic nanoparticle assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphite: the coupled effect of ultrasound and wedging nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem2018;
44: 204–214.
87.
LeeHBratescuMAUenoT, et al.
Solution plasma exfoliation of graphene flakes from graphite electrodes. RSC Adv2014;
4: 51758–51765.
88.
ParvezKLiRPunireddSR, et al.
Electrochemically exfoliated graphene as solution-processable, highly conductive electrodes for organic electronics. ACS Nano2013;
7: 3598–3606.
89.
ParvezKWuZ-SLiR, et al.
Exfoliation of graphite into graphene in aqueous solutions of inorganic salts. J Am Chem Soc2014;
136: 6083–6091.
90.
ZhongYLTianZSimonGP, et al.
Scalable production of graphene via wet chemistry: progress and challenges. Mater Today2015;
18: 73–78.
91.
JiangFYuYWangY, et al.
A novel synthesis route of graphene via microwave assisted intercalation-exfoliation of graphite. Mater Lett2017;
200: 39–42.
92.
SegundoEHFontanaLCReccoAAC, et al.
Graphene nanosheets obtained through graphite powder exfoliation in pulsed underwater electrical discharge. Mater Chem Phys2018;
217: 1–4.
93.
HernandezYNicolosiVLotyaM, et al.
High-Yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nature Nanotech2008;
3: 563–568.
94.
BagriAMatteviCAcikM, et al.
Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nature Chem2010;
2: 581–587.
95.
ItoYChristodoulouCNardiMV, et al.
Chemical vapor deposition of N-doped graphene and carbon films: the role of precursors and gas phase. ACS Nano2014;
8: 3337–3346.
96.
KoltaiJKuzmanyHPichlerT, et al.
Arrayed arrangement Of13C isotopes during the growth of inner single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Status Solidi B2017;
254: 1700217.
97.
ChangRJWangXWangS, et al.
Growth of large single-crystalline monolayer hexagonal boron nitride by oxide-assisted chemical vapor deposition. Chem Mater2017;
29: 6252–6260.
98.
WangMJangSKJangWJ, et al.
A platform for large-scale graphene electronics—CVD growth of single-layer graphene on CVD-Grown hexagonal boron nitride. Adv Mater2013;
25: 2746–2752.
99.
JohanssonA-SLuJCarlssonJ-O.TEM investigation of CVD graphite on nickel. Thin Solid Films1994;
252: 19–25.
100.
LuoBGaoEGengD, et al.
Etching-controlled growth of graphene by chemical vapor deposition. Chem Mater2017;
29: 1022–1027.
101.
ChenMYanYZhangXF, et al.
Advances in large-area graphene film transfer techniques.J Aeronaut Mater2015;
35: 1–11.
102.
YuWJHuangYWangY, et al.
Chemical vapour deposition growth of large single crystals of monolayer and bilayer graphene. Nat Commun2013;
4: 1–8.
103.
Chang SJ, Hyun MS, Myung S, et al. Graphene Growth from Reduced Graphene Oxide by Chemical Vapour Deposition: Seeded Growth Accompanied by Restoration. Sci Rep 2016; 6. DOI: 10.1038/srep22653.
104.
LiXColomboLRuoffRS.Synthesis of graphene films on copper foils by chemical vapor deposition. Adv Mater2016;
28: 6247–6252.
105.
ZhangRDuanTLingL, et al.
CH4 dehydrogenation on Cu (1 1 1), Cu@Cu(1 1 1), Rh@Cu(1 1 1) and RhCu(1 1 1) surfaces: a comparison studies of catalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci2015;
341: 100–108.
106.
LiJSen WangYLiuCH, et al.
Coupled molybdenum carbide and reduced graphene oxide electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun2016;
7: 11204.
107.
LvJJWangAJMaX, et al.
One-pot synthesis of porous Pt-Au nanodendrites supported on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets toward catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J Mater Chem A2015;
3: 290–296.
108.
KuilaTMishraAKKhanraP, et al.
Recent advances in the efficient reduction of graphene oxide and its application as energy storage electrode materials. Nanoscale2013;
5: 52–71.
109.
SunHMeiLLiangJ, et al.
Three-dimensional holey-graphene/niobia composite architectures for ultrahigh-rate energy storage. Science2017;
356: 599–604.
110.
De SilvaKKHHuangHHJoshiRK, et al.
Chemical reduction of graphene oxide using green reductants. Carbon2017;
119: 190–199.
111.
TortelloMColonnaSBernalM, et al.
Effect of thermal annealing on the heat transfer properties of reduced graphite oxide flakes: a nanoscale characterization via scanning thermal microscopy. Carbon2016;
109: 390–401.
112.
TourJM.Top-down versus bottom-up fabrication of graphene-based electronics. Chem Mater2014;
26: 163–171.
113.
HeHRiedlTLerfA, et al.
Solid-State NMR studies of the structure of graphite oxide. J Phys Chem1996;
100: 19954–19958.
114.
GaoXJangJNagaseS.Hydrazine and thermal reduction of graphene oxide: reaction mechanisms, product structures, and reaction design. J Phys Chem C2010;
114: 832–842.
115.
GaoW. The chemistry of graphene oxide. In: Graphene oxide: reduction recipes, spectroscopy. Cham: Springer, 2015, pp. 61–95.
116.
ChuaCKPumeraM.Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: a synthetic chemistry viewpoint. Chem Soc Rev2014;
43: 291–312.
117.
An WongCHPumeraM.Highly conductive graphene nanoribbons from the reduction of graphene oxide nanoribbons with lithium aluminium hydride. J Mater Chem C2014;
2: 856–863.
118.
CuiPLeeJHwangE, et al.
One-pot reduction of graphene oxide at subzero temperatures.Chem Commun2011;
47: 12370–12372.
119.
MohanVBBrownRJayaramanK, et al.
Characterisation of reduced graphene oxide: effects of reduction variables on electrical conductivity. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater Adv Technol2015;
193: 49–60.
120.
ChuaCKPumeraM.Renewal of Sp 2 bonds in graphene oxides via dehydrobromination. J Mater Chem2012;
22: 23227–23231.
121.
ArifinNFTAzizM.Effect of reduction time on optical properties of reduced graphene oxide. J Teknol2017;
79: 25–28.
122.
HouZZhouYLiG, et al.
Reduction of graphene oxide and its effect on square resistance of reduced graphene oxide films. Bull Korean Chem Soc2015;
36: 1681–1687.
123.
GaoW.Graphite oxide: structure, reduction and applications. Mater Manuf Process2012;
2012: 6–10.
124.
ChuaCKPumeraM.Reduction of graphene oxide with substituted borohydrides. J Mater Chem A2013;
1: 1892–1898.
125.
ZhuoQZhangYDuQ, et al.
Facile reduction of graphene oxide at room temperature by ammonia borane via salting out effect. J Colloid Interface Sci2015;
457: 243–247.
126.
PhamVHHurSHKimEJ, et al.
Highly efficient reduction of graphene oxide using ammonia borane. Chem Commun2013;
49: 6665–6667.
127.
ChuaCKAmbrosiAPumeraM.Graphene oxide reduction by standard industrial reducing agent: thiourea dioxide. J Mater Chem2012;
22: 11054–11061.
128.
DongLLong ChenWGe DengN, et al.
A novel fabrication of graphene by chemical reaction with a green reductant. Chem Eng J2016;
306: 754–762.
129.
MaQSongJJinC, et al.
A rapid and easy approach for the reduction of graphene oxide by formamidinesulfinic acid. Carbon N Y2013;
54: 36–41.
130.
ChuaCKPumeraM.Selective removal of hydroxyl groups from graphene oxide.Chem Eur J2013;
19: 2005–2011.
131.
LiuHZhangLGuoY, et al.
Reduction of graphene oxide to highly conductive graphene by Lawesson’s reagent and its electrical applications. J Mater Chem C2013;
1: 3104–3109.
132.
MohammadiSZBeitollahiHMousaviM.Determination of hydroxylamine using a carbon paste electrode modified with graphene oxide nano sheets. Russ J Electrochem2017;
53: 374–379.
133.
ZhouXZhangJWuH, et al.
Reducing graphene oxide via hydroxylamine: a simple and efficient route to graphene. J Phys Chem C2011;
115: 11957–11961.
134.
RuoffRSPinerRDStankovichS, et al.
Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon2007;
45: 1558–1565.
135.
CcorahuaRTroncosoOPRodriguezS, et al.
Hydrazine treatment improves conductivity of bacterial cellulose/graphene nanocomposites obtained by a novel processing method. Carbohydr Polym2017;
171: 68–76.
136.
KimNHKuilaTLeeJH.Simultaneous reduction, functionalization and stitching of graphene oxide with ethylenediamine for composites application. J Mater Chem A2013;
1: 1349–1358.
137.
ZhangJWangCZhouJ.Ethylenediamine-Functionalized reduced graphene oxide for enhanced methylene blue removal. Environ Eng Sci2017;
34: 394–400.
138.
LeiZLuLZhaoXS.The electrocapacitive properties of graphene oxide reduced by urea. Energy Environ Sci2012;
5: 6391–6399.
139.
KhojastehHSalavati-NiasariMSafajouH, et al.
Facile reduction of graphene using urea in solid phase and surface modification by N-Doped graphene quantum dots for adsorption of organic dyes. Diam Relat Mater2017;
79: 133–144.
140.
LiuMHouZHuangB, et al.
The preparation, characterization, and properties of silver nanoparticle reinforced reduced graphene oxide–poly(amidoamine) nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2017;
134: 45172.
141.
YuanYZhangGLiY, et al.
Poly(amidoamine) modified graphene oxide as an efficient adsorbent for heavy metal ions. Polym Chem2013;
4: 2164–2167.
DreyerDRMuraliSZhuY, et al.
Reduction of graphite oxide using alcohols. J Mater Chem2011;
21: 3443–3447.
144.
SoaresCPPBaptistaRdeL, et al.
Solvothermal reduction of graphite oxide using alcohols. Mater Res 2017; 21: 1--7.
145.
ZhuCGuoSFangY, et al.
Reducing sugar: new functional molecules for the green synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano2010;
4: 2429–2437.
146.
KamisanAIZainuddinLWKamisanAS, et al.
Ultrasonic assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide in glucose solution. Kem2016;
708: 25–29.
147.
HuYSunDDingJ, et al.
Decorated reduced graphene oxide for photo-chemotherapy. J Mater Chem B2016;
4: 929–937.
148.
BoZShuaiXMaoS, et al.
Green preparation of reduced graphene oxide for sensing and energy storage applications. Sci Rep2014;
4: 4684.
149.
LeeJYKimNYShinDY, et al.
Nitrogen-doped graphene-wrapped iron nanofragments for high-performance oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. J Nanoparticle Res2017;
19: 98.
150.
FanZJKaiWYanJ, et al.
Facile synthesis of graphene nanosheets via Fe reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. ACS Nano2011;
5: 191–198.
151.
YangSYueWHuangD, et al.
A facile green strategy for rapid reduction of graphene oxide by metallic zinc. RSC Adv2012;
2: 8827–8832.
152.
FanZWangKWeiT, et al.
An environmentally friendly and efficient route for the reduction of graphene oxide by aluminum powder. Carbon2010;
48: 1686–1689.
153.
JankovskýOŠimekPNováčekM, et al.
Use of deuterium labelling—evidence of graphene hydrogenation by reduction of graphite oxide using aluminium in sodium hydroxide. RSC Adv2015;
5: 18733–18739.
154.
DominguesSHKholmanovINKimT, et al.
Reduction of graphene oxide films on Al foil for hybrid transparent conductive film applications. Carbon N Y2013;
63: 454–459.
155.
SohnMParkEYooBM, et al.
Metal-assisted mechanochemical reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon N Y2016;
110: 79–86.
StankovichSPinerRDNguyenSBT, et al.
Exfoliation of isocyanate-treated graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Carbon N Y2006;
44: 3342–3347.
158.
YanLLinMZengC, et al.
Electroactive and biocompatible hydroxyl- functionalized graphene by ball milling. J Mater Chem2012;
22: 8367–8371.
159.
RenteriaJDRamirezSMalekpourH, et al.
Strongly anisotropic thermal conductivity of free-standing reduced graphene oxide films annealed at high temperature. Adv Funct Mater2015;
25: 4664–4672.
160.
TianSSunJYangS, et al.
Facile thermal annealing of graphite oxide in air for graphene with a higher C/O ratio. RSC Adv2015;
5: 69854–69860.
161.
VoiryDYangJKupferbergJ, et al.
High-quality graphene via microwave reduction of solution-exfoliated graphene oxide. Science2016;
353: 1413–1416.
162.
NeubauerEKitzmantelMHulmanM, et al.
Potential and challenges of metal-matrix-composites reinforced with carbon nanofibers and carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol2010;
70: 2228–2236.
163.
WangFChuKLiY, et al.
Enhanced interfacial bonding and mechanical properties of graphene/Cu composites: a matrix-alloying method. Phys Status Solidi Appl Mater Sci2018; 215: 1800104.
OhSIl LimJYKimYC, et al.
Fabrication of carbon nanofiber reinforced aluminum alloy nanocomposites by a liquid process. J Alloys Compd2012;
542: 111–117.
166.
RocherJPQuenissetJMNaslainR.Wetting improvement of carbon or silicon carbide by aluminium alloys based on a K2ZrF6surface treatment: application to composite material casting. J Mater Sci1989;
24: 2697–2703.
167.
SharmaASagarSMahtoRP, et al.
Surface modification of Al6061 by graphene impregnation through a powder metallurgy assisted friction surfacing. Surf Coatings Technol2018;
337: 12–23.
168.
Prashantha KumarHGAnthony XaviorM.Processing and characterization of Al 6061—graphene nanocomposites. Mater Today: Proceedings2017;
4: 3308–3314.
169.
Aussavy D, Costil S, El Kedim O et al. Metal Matrix Composite Coatings Manufactured by Thermal Spraying: Influence of the Powder Preparation on the Coating Properties. J Therm Spray Tech 2014; 23: 190--196. DOI: 10.1007/s11666-013-9999-3.
170.
AshrafPMThomasSNEdwinL.Development of graphene–nanometre-sized cerium oxide-incorporated aluminium and its electrochemical evaluation. Appl Nanosci2016;
6: 149–158.
171.
ZhangCZhangJLinK, et al.
Laser-assisted chemical vapor deposition setup for fast synthesis of graphene patterns. Rev Sci Instrum2017;
88: 053907.
172.
ChaSIKimKTArshadSN, et al.
Extraordinary strengthening effect of carbon nanotubes in metal-matrix nanocomposites processed by molecular-level mixing. Adv Mater2005;
17: 1377–1381.
173.
TjongSC.Recent progress in the development and properties of novel metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep2013;
74: 281–350.
174.
NietoALahiriDAgarwalA.Synthesis and properties of bulk graphene nanoplatelets consolidated by spark plasma sintering. Carbon N Y2012;
50: 4068–4077.
175.
ParameswaranPEzhilarasiTBakshiSR. Spark plasma sintering process as a tool for achieving microstructural integrity. In: Advances in structural integrity. Singapore: Springer, 2018, pp. 649–659.
176.
ÁlvarezITorrecillasRSolisW, et al.
Microstructural design of Al2O3–SiC nanocomposites by spark plasma sintering. Ceram Int2016;
42: 17248–17253.
177.
BahramiSZakeriMFaeghiniaA, et al.
Spark plasma sintering of silicon nitride/barium aluminum silicate composite. Ceram Int2017;
43: 9153–9157.
178.
InamFVoTBhatBR.Structural stability studies of graphene in sintered ceramic nanocomposites. Ceram Int2014;
40: 16227–16233.
179.
SinghDKIyerPKGiriPK.Diameter dependence of oxidative stability in multiwalled carbon nanotubes: role of defects and effect of vacuum annealing. J Appl Phys2010; 108: 084313.
180.
BarreC.Hot isostatic pressing. Adv Mater Process1999;
155: 47–48.
ViswanathanVLahaTBalaniK, et al.
Challenges and advances in nanocomposite processing techniques. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep2006;
54: 121–285.
183.
NutschG.Atmospheric induction plasma spraying. High Temp Mat Proc2002;
6: 8.
184.
AzarmiF.Vacuum plasma spraying. Adv Mater Process2005;
163: 37–39.
185.
PoyatoRVasilievALPadtureNP, et al.
Aqueous colloidal processing of single-wall carbon nanotubes and their composites with ceramics. Nanotechnology2006;
17: 1770–1777.
186.
KangKBaeGWonJ, et al.
Mechanical property enhancement of kinetic sprayed Al coatings reinforced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Acta Mater2012;
60: 5031–5039.
187.
KangKKimJParkH, et al.
Formation and heat treatment of kinetic sprayed nanocrystalline Al coatings reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes: the relationship between microstructural features and physical properties. Surf Coat Technol2016;
289: 124–135.
188.
SabooriAPaveseMBadiniC, et al.
Microstructure and thermal conductivity of Al-Graphene composites fabricated by powder metallurgy and hot rolling techniques. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett)2017;
30: 675–687.
189.
ShinSEEBaeDHH.Deformation behavior of aluminum alloy matrix composites reinforced with few-layer graphene. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
78: 42–47.
190.
Ab RahimSNLajisMAAriffinS.A review on recycling aluminum chips by hot extrusion process. In Procedia CIRP2015;
26: 761–766.
191.
YangXLiuEShiC, et al.
Fabrication of carbon nanotube reinforced Al composites with well-balanced strength and ductility. J Alloys Compd2013;
563: 216–220.
192.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.
Effect of graphene nanoplatelets addition on mechanical properties of pure aluminum using a semi-powder method. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int2014;
24: 101–108.
193.
JeonCHJeongYHSeoJJ, et al.
Material properties of graphene/aluminum metal matrix composites fabricated by friction stir processing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2014;
15: 1235–1239.
194.
ShankarSSawKChattopadhyayaS, et al.
Investigation on different type of defects, temperature variation and mechanical properties of friction stir welded lap joint of aluminum alloy 6101-T6.Mater Today: Proceedings2018;
5: 24378–24386.
195.
JohannesLBYowellLLSosaE, et al.
Survivability of single-walled carbon nanotubes during friction stir processing. Nanotechnology2006;
17: 3081–3084.
196.
SharmaSCheemaGSSinghSS, et al. Improvement of mechanical properties and morphological studies of friction stir processed composites. Hershey: IGI Global, 2018, pp. 152–179.
197.
JataKVMahoneyMWMishraRS, et al.
Friction stir welding and processing III. Frict Stir Weld Process III2010;
29: 298.
198.
MishraRSMaZYCharitI.Friction stir processing: a novel technique for fabrication of surface composite. Mater Sci Eng A2003;
341: 307–310.
199.
ChenLYKonishiHFehrenbacherA, et al.
Novel nanoprocessing route for bulk graphene nanoplatelets reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Scr Mater2012;
67: 29–32.
200.
LuoHSuiYQiJ, et al.
Copper matrix composites enhanced by silver/reduced graphene oxide hybrids. Mater Lett2017;
196: 354–357.
201.
Pérez-BustamanteRBolaños-MoralesDBonilla-MartínezJ, et al.
Microstructural and hardness behavior of graphene-nanoplatelets/aluminum composites synthesized by mechanical alloying. J Alloys Compd2014;
615: S578–S582.
202.
ChuKJiaC.Enhanced strength in bulk graphene-copper composites. Phys Status Solidi A2014;
211: 184–190.
203.
El-EskandaranyMS.Reactive ball milling for fabrication of metal nitride nanocrystalline powders. Mech Alloy2015;
26: 182–201.
204.
YuZYangWZhouC, et al.
Effect of ball milling time on graphene nanosheets reinforced Al6063 composite fabricated by pressure infiltration method. Carbon2019;
141: 25–39.
205.
BastwrosMKimGYZhuC, et al.
Effect of ball milling on graphene reinforced Al6061 composite fabricated by semi-solid sintering. Compos Part B Eng2014;
60: 111–118.
206.
XuJShuiJWangJ, et al.
Sulfur-graphene nanostructured cathodes via ball-milling for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano2014;
8: 10920–10930.
207.
JeonIYBaeSYSeoJM, et al.
Scalable production of edge-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets via mechanochemical ball-milling. Adv Funct Mater2015;
25: 6961–6975.
208.
IkedaANobusawaKHamanoT, et al.
Single-walled carbon nanotubes template the one-dimensional ordering of a polythiophene derivative. Org Lett2006;
8: 5489–5492.
209.
LeónVQuintanaMHerreroMA, et al.
Few-layer graphenes from ball-milling of graphite with melamine. Chem Commun2011;
47: 10936–10938.
210.
ChaJJunGHParkJK, et al.
Improvement of modulus, strength and fracture toughness of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites through the functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Compos Part B Eng2017;
129: 169–179.
211.
JeonI-YShinY-RSohnG-J, et al.
Edge-carboxylated graphene nanosheets via ball milling. Proc Natl Acad Sci2012;
109: 5588–5593.
212.
FanXChangDWChenX, et al.
Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets from ball milling for energy applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng2016;
11: 52–58.
213.
Prashantha KumarHGAnthony XaviorM.Encapsulation and microwave hybrid processing of Al 6061–graphene–SiC composites. Mater Manuf Process2018;
33: 19–25.
214.
LewisJA.Colloidal processing of ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2004;
83: 2341–2359.
215.
JambagiSCSarkarNBandyopadhyayPP.Preparation of carbon nanotube doped ceramic powders for plasma sprayingusing heterocoagulation method. J Eur Ceram Soc2015;
35: 989–1000.
216.
ArvanitelisCJayaseelanDDChoJ, et al. Carbon
nanotube-SiO2 composites by colloidal processing. Adv Appl Ceram2008;
107: 155–158.
217.
GrigorievSPeretyaginPSmirnovA, et al.
Effect of graphene addition on the mechanical and electrical properties of Al2O3-SiCw ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc2017;
37: 2473–2479.
218.
Zhan H, Zheng X and Feng M. Giant optical limiting effect in Ormosil gel glasses doped with graphene oxide materials. J Mater Chem C 2013; 1: 6759--6766.
219.
ZhengCFengMZhenX, et al.
Materials investigation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes doped silica gel glass composites. J Non Cryst Solids2008;
354: 1327–1330.
220.
MaoJIocozziaJHuangJ, et al.
Graphene aerogels for efficient energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ Sci2018;
11: 772–799.
221.
EtacheriV. Sol-gel processed cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Sol-Gel Mater Energy Environ Electron Appl. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 155–195.
222.
HuYCHsuWLWangYT, et al.
Enhance the pyroelectricity of polyvinylidene fluoride by graphene-oxide doping. Sensors (Switzerland)2014;
14: 6877–6890.
223.
JiangYChenYLiuYJ, et al.
Lightweight spongy bone-like graphene@SiC aerogel composites for high-performance microwave absorption. Chem Eng J2018;
337: 522–531.
224.
CauquiMARodríguez-IzquierdoJM.Application of the sol-gel methods to catalyst preparation. J Non Cryst Solids1992;
147–148: 724–738.
225.
ZengYZhouYKongL, et al.
A novel composite of SiO2-Coated graphene oxide and molecularly imprinted polymers for electrochemical sensing dopamine. Biosens Bioelectron2013;
45: 25–33.
226.
AyyappadasCMuthuchamyARaja AnnamalaiA, et al.
An investigation on the effect of sintering mode on various properties of copper-graphene metal matrix composite. Adv Powder Technol2017;
28: 1760–1768.
227.
RajkovicVBozicDStasicJ, et al.
Processing, characterization and properties of copper-based composites strengthened by low amount of alumina particles. Powder Technol2014;
268: 392–400.
228.
LiJYuSZhouY, et al.
Phase separation in pre-ceramic polymers blends and its influence on the microstructure of ZrC/SiC ceramic derivatives. Mater Lett2015;
156: 72–75.
229.
LeonCARodriguez-OrtizGNankoM, et al.
Pulsed electric current sintering of Cu matrix composites reinforced with plain and coated alumina powders. Powder Technol2014;
252: 1–7.
230.
GaoXYueHGuoE, et al.
Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of graphene reinforced copper matrix composites. Powder Technol2016;
301: 601–607.
231.
ZhangDZhanZ.Strengthening effect of graphene derivatives in copper matrix composites. J Alloys Compd2016;
654: 226–233.
232.
PavithraCLPSaradaBVRajulapatiKV, et al.
A new electrochemical approach for the synthesis of Copper-Graphene nanocomposite foils with high hardness. Sci Rep2014;
4: 1–7.
233.
LiMCheHLiuX, et al.
Highly enhanced mechanical properties in Cu matrix composites reinforced with graphene decorated metallic nanoparticles. J Mater Sci2014;
49: 3725–3731.
234.
DutkiewiczJOzgaPMaziarzW, et al.
Microstructure and properties of bulk copper matrix composites strengthened with various kinds of graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Sci Eng A2015;
628: 124–134.
235.
XiongDBCaoMGuoQ, et al.
Graphene-and-copper artificial nacre fabricated by a preform impregnation process: bioinspired strategy for strengthening-toughening of metal matrix composite. ACS Nano2015;
9: 6934–6943.
236.
MaiYJZhouMPLingHJ, et al.
Surfactant-free electrodeposition of reduced graphene oxide/copper composite coatings with enhanced wear resistance. Appl Surf Sci2017; 433: 232–239.
237.
HeYHuangFLiH, et al.
Tensile mechanical properties of nano-layered copper/graphene composite. Phys E Low-Dimens Syst Nanostruct2017;
87: 233–236.
238.
PonrajNVAzhagurajanAVettivelSC, et al.
Graphene nanosheet as reinforcement agent in copper matrix composite by using powder metallurgy method. Surf Interf2017;
6: 190–196.
239.
NayanNShuklaAKChandranP, et al.
Processing and characterization of spark plasma sintered copper/carbon nanotube composites. Mater Sci Eng A2017;
682: 229–237.
240.
HsiehS-HTingJ-M.Characterization and photocatalytic performance of ternary Cu-Doped ZnO/graphene materials. Appl Surf Sci2018;
427: 465–475.
241.
NguyenDCTOhWC.Ternary self-assembly method of mesoporous silica and Cu2O combined graphene composite by nonionic surfactant and photocatalytic degradation of cationic-anionic dye pollutants. Sep Purif Technol2018;
190: 77–89.
242.
Sjögren B, Iregren A, Montelius J, et al. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals (Fourth Edition), 2015, pp. 549--564.
243.
BoostaniFTahamtanAJiangS, et al.
Enhanced tensile properties of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphene encapsulated SiC nanoparticles. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
68: 155–163.
244.
BaigZMamatOMustaphaM, et al.
Influence of surfactant type on the dispersion state and properties of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced aluminium matrix nanocomposites. Fuller Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct2017;
25: 545–557.
245.
PrabhakaranSKumarHGPKalainathanS, et al.
Laser shock peening modified surface texturing, microstructure and mechanical properties of graphene dispersion strengthened aluminium nanocomposites. Surf Interfaces2019;
14: 127–137.
246.
HG PK, Prabhakaran S, Xavior Aet al.
Enhanced surface and mechanical properties of bioinspired nanolaminate graphene-aluminum alloy nanocomposites through laser shock processing for engineering applications. Mater Today Commun2018;
16: 81–89.
247.
Cano-CrespoRMoshtaghiounBMGómez-GarcíaD, et al.
High-Temperature creep of carbon nanofiber-reinforced and graphene oxide-reinforced alumina composites sintered by spark plasma sintering. Ceram Int2017;
43: 7136–7141.
248.
TuranMERashadMZenginH, et al.
Effect of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on elevated temperature tensile and wear behavior of Al2024 matrix composites fabricated by stir casting and hot extrusion. J Mater Eng Perform2020;
29: 5227–5237.
249.
Prashantha KumarHGAnthony XaviorM.Effect of graphene addition and tribological performance of Al 6061/graphene flake composite. Tribol Mater Surf Interfaces2017;
11: 88–97.
250.
KumarHGPXaviorMAAshwathP.Ultrasonication and microwave processing of aluminum alloy- graphene—Al2O3 nanocomposite. Mater Manuf Process2018;
33: 13–18.
251.
Prashantha KumarHGAnthony XaviorM.Effect of graphene addition on flexural properties of Al 6061 nanocomposites. Mater Today: Proceedings2017;
4: 8127–8133.
252.
PanYHongNZhanJ, et al.
Effect of graphene on the fire and mechanical performances of glass fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composites containing aluminum hypophosphite. Polym—Plast Technol Eng2014;
53: 1467–1475.
253.
HuZTongGLinD, et al.
Graphene-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites—a review. Mater Sci Technol2016;
32: 930–953.
254.
RashadMPanFAsifM, et al.
Powder metallurgy of Mg-1%Al-1%Sn alloy reinforced with low content of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). J Ind Eng Chem2014;
20: 4250–4255.
255.
RashadMPanFAsifM, et al.
Improving properties of Mg with Al-Cu additions. Mater Charact2014;
95: 140–147.
256.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.
Improved strength and ductility of magnesium with addition of aluminum and graphene nanoplatelets (Al+GNPs) using semi powder metallurgy method. J Ind Eng Chem2015;
23: 243–250.
257.
ShinSEChoiHJShinJH, et al.
Strengthening behavior of few-layered graphene/aluminum composites.Carbon2015;
82: 143–151.
258.
ZhangHXuCXiaoW, et al.
Enhanced mechanical properties of Al5083 alloy with graphene nanoplates prepared by ball milling and hot extrusion. Mater Sci Eng A2016;
658: 8–15.
259.
WardDGuptaASarafS, et al.
Functional NiAl-graphene oxide composite as a model coating for aerospace component repair.Carbon2016;
105: 529–543.
260.
KumarHGPXaviorMA.Fatigue and wear behavior of Al6061–graphene composites synthesized by powder metallurgy. Trans Indian Inst Met2016;
69: 415–419.
261.
KhodabakhshiFArabSMŠvecP, et al.
Fabrication of a new Al-Mg/graphene nanocomposite by multi-pass friction-stir processing: dispersion, microstructure, stability, and strengthening. Mater Charact2017;
132: 92–107.
262.
SahooBJosephJSharmaA, et al.
Surface modification of aluminium by graphene impregnation. Mater Des2017;
116: 51–64.
263.
BishtASrivastavaMKumarRM, et al.
Strengthening mechanism in graphene nanoplatelets reinforced aluminum composite fabricated through spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2017;
695: 20–28.
264.
SimsekINGNistalAGarcíaE, et al.
The effect of graphene nanoplatelets on the thermal and electrical properties of aluminum nitride ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc2017;
37: 3721–3729.
265.
ChenJSongYShanD, et al.
Modifications of the hydrotalcite film on AZ31 Mg alloy by phytic acid: the effects on morphology, composition and corrosion resistance. Corros Sci2013;
74: 130–138.
266.
WilkeBMZhangLLiW, et al.
Corrosion performance of MAO coatings on AZ31 Mg alloy in simulated body fluid vs. Earle’s. Balance Salt Solut Appl Surf Sci2016;
363: 328–337.
267.
RashadMPanFHuH, et al.
Enhanced tensile properties of magnesium composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Sci Eng A2015;
630: 36–44.
268.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.
Effect of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) addition on strength and ductility of magnesium-titanium alloys. J Magnes Alloy2013;
1: 242–248.
269.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.
Synergetic effect of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MW-CNTs) on mechanical properties of pure magnesium. J Alloys Compd2014;
603: 111–118.
270.
VKPrakashSRajeshR, et al.
Electro deposition of R-GO/SiC nano-composites on magnesium and its corrosion behavior in aqueous electrolyte. Appl Surf Sci2017;
424: 63–71.
271.
RashadMPanFAsifM, et al.
Corrosion behavior of magnesium-graphene composites in sodium chloride solutions. J Magnes Alloy2017;
5: 271–276.
272.
RashadMPanFLiuY, et al.
High temperature formability of graphene nanoplatelets-AZ31 composites fabricated by stir-casting method. J Magnes Alloy2016;
4: 270–277.
273.
RashadMPanFAsifM, et al.
Enhanced ductility of Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy reinforced with short length multi-walled carbon nanotubes using a powder metallurgy method. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int2015;
25: 276–281.
274.
RashadMPanFYuZ, et al.
Investigation on microstructural, mechanical and electrochemical properties of aluminum composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int2015;
25: 460–470.
275.
RashadMPanFAsifM.Magnesium matrix composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Graphene Mater Fundam Emerg Appl2015;
153: 151–189.
276.
RashadMPanFZhangJ, et al.
Use of high energy ball milling to study the role of graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes reinforced magnesium alloy. J Alloys Compd2015;
646: 223–232.
277.
RashadMPanFAsifM.Exploring mechanical behavior of Mg-6Zn alloy reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Sci Eng A2016;
649: 263–269.
278.
RashadMPanFLinD, et al.
High temperature mechanical behavior of AZ61 magnesium alloy reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Des2016;
89: 1242–1250.
279.
KavimaniVSoorya PrakashKArun PandianM.Influence of R-GO addition on enhancement of corrosion and wear behavior of AZ31 MMC. Appl Phys A2017;
123: 514.
280.
TuranMESunYAkgulY, et al.
The effect of GNPs on wear and corrosion behaviors of pure magnesium. J Alloys Compd2017;
724: 14–23.
281.
DuFPYangWZhangF, et al.
Enhancing the heat transfer efficiency in graphene-epoxy nanocomposites using a magnesium oxide-graphene hybrid structure. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2015;
7: 14397–14403.
282.
WuLWuRHouL, et al.
Microstructure, mechanical properties and wear performance of AZ31 matrix composites reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets(GNPs.). J Alloys Compd2018;
750: 530–536.
283.
DuXDuWWangZ, et al.
Ultra-High strengthening efficiency of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced magnesium matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2018;
711: 633–642.
284.
WeibelAMesguichDChevallierG, et al.
Fast and easy preparation of few-layered-graphene/magnesia powders for strong. Hard Electric Conduct Compos Carbon N Y2018;
136: 270–279.
285.
ChenLZhaoYHouH, et al.
Development of AZ91D magnesium alloy-graphene nanoplatelets composites using thixomolding process. J Alloys Compd2019;
778: 359–374.
286.
Torabi PariziMEbrahimiGREzatpourHR.Effect of graphene nanoplatelets content on the microstructural and mechanical properties of AZ80 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A2019;
742: 373–389.
287.
KumarPMallickAKujurMS, et al.
Effects of graphene nanoplatelets on the tribological, mechanical, and thermal properties of Mg-3Al alloy nanocomposites. Int J Mater Res2019;
110: 534–542.
288.
LinDRichard LiuCChengGJ.Single-layer graphene oxide reinforced metal matrix composites by laser sintering: microstructure and mechanical property enhancement. Acta Mater2014;
80: 183–193.
289.
MoyseowiczAŚliwakAMiniachE, et al.
Polypyrrole/iron oxide/reduced graphene oxide ternary composite as a binderless electrode material with high cyclic stability for supercapacitors. Compos Part B Eng2017;
109: 23–29.
290.
TanYZhuKLiD, et al.
N-Doped graphene/Fe-Fe3C nano-composite synthesized by a Fe-based metal organic framework and its anode performance in lithium ion batteries. Chem Eng J2014;
258: 93–100.
291.
ZhangLLiNXiaH, et al.
Preparation and mechanical properties of (Ni–Fe)–graphene composite coating. Adv Eng Mater2016;
18: 1716–1719.
292.
AlbaajiAJCastleEGReeceMJ, et al.
Synthesis and properties of graphene and graphene/carbon nanotube-reinforced soft magnetic FeCo alloy composites by spark plasma sintering. J Mater Sci2016;
51: 7624–7635.
293.
RamirezSChanKHernandezR, et al.
Thermal and magnetic properties of nanostructured densified ferrimagnetic composites with graphene—graphite fillers. Mater Des2017;
118: 75–80.
294.
LiNZhangLZhuY, et al.
The effect of graphene on the deposition and mechanical property of Ni-Fe-Graphene composite coating. J Electrochem Soc2018;
165: D215–D222.
295.
JafarlouHHassannezhadKAsgharzadehH, et al.
Enhancement of mechanical properties of low carbon steel joints via graphene addition. Mater Sci Technol2018;
34: 455–467.
296.
ZhuLLiuZXiaP, et al.
Synthesis of hierarchical ZnO&graphene composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int2018;
44: 849–856.
297.
FuXJiangTZhaoQ, et al.
A facile synthesis of graphene-metal (Pb, Zn, cd, Mn) sulfide composites. J Mater Sci2012;
47: 1026–1032.
298.
ChenCCaiWLongM, et al.
Synthesis of visible-light responsive graphene oxide/TiO2 composites with p/n heterojunction. ACS Nano2010;
4: 6425–6432.
299.
ZhaoGRenXGaoX, et al.
Removal of Pb(Ii) ions from aqueous solutions on few-layered graphene oxide nanosheets. Dalton Trans2011;
40: 10945.
300.
WangYLiangSChenB, et al.
Synergistic removal of Pb(II), cd(II) and humic acid by Fe 3 O 4 @mesoporous silica-graphene oxide composites. PLoS One2013;
8: e65634.
301.
GaoLYueWTaoS, et al.
Novel strategy for preparation of graphene-Pd, Pt composite, and its enhanced electrocatalytic activity for alcohol oxidation. Langmuir2013;
29: 957–964.
302.
BaoQZhangDQiP.Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticle and graphene oxide nanosheet composites as a bactericidal agent for water disinfection. J Colloid Interface Sci2011;
360: 463–470.
303.
AlexanderRMurthyTSRCRavikanthKV, et al.
Effect of graphene nano-platelet reinforcement on the mechanical properties of hot pressed boron carbide based composite. Ceram Int2019;
110: 534–542.
304.
MuXNZhangHMCaiHN, et al.
Microstructure evolution and superior tensile properties of low content graphene nanoplatelets reinforced pure Ti matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2017;
687: 164–174.
305.
NietoALahiriDAgarwalA.Graphene NanoPlatelets reinforced tantalum carbide consolidated by spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2013;
582: 338–346.
306.
RashadMPanFSAsifM, et al.
Improved mechanical properties of magnesium-graphene composites with copper-graphene hybrids. Mater Sci Technol2015;
31: 1452–1461.
307.
XiangJXieLMeguidSA, et al.
An atomic-level understanding of the strengthening mechanism of aluminum matrix composites reinforced by aligned carbon nanotubes. Comput Mater Sci2017;
128: 359–372.
308.
SunGLiangRLuZ, et al.
Mechanism of cement/carbon nanotube composites with enhanced mechanical properties achieved by interfacial strengthening. Constr Build Mater2016;
115: 87–92.
309.
TangXCMengLYZhanJM, et al.
Strengthening effects of encapsulating graphene in SiC particle-reinforced Al-matrix composites. Comput Mater Sci2018;
153: 275–281.
310.
ChenXTaoJYiJ, et al.
Strengthening behavior of carbon nanotube-graphene hybrids in copper matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2018;
718: 427–436.
311.
ZhangZChenDL.Contribution of orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A2008;
483-484: 148–152.
312.
ZhangYZhuangXMuthuJ, et al.
Load transfer of graphene/carbon nanotube/polyethylene hybrid nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation. Compos Part B Eng2014;
63: 27–33.
313.
AnagnostopoulosGPappasPNLiZ, et al.
Mechanical stability of flexible graphene-based displays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016;
8: 22605–22614.
314.
ZareYFasihiMRheeKY.Efficiency of stress transfer between polymer matrix and nanoplatelets in clay/polymer nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci2017;
143: 265–272.
315.
Fadavi BoostaniAYazdaniSTaherzadeh MousavianR, et al.
Strengthening mechanisms of graphene sheets in aluminium matrix nanocomposites. Mater Des2015;
88: 983–989.
316.
LinDMotlagMSaeiM, et al.
Shock engineering the additive manufactured graphene-metal nanocomposite with high density nanotwins and dislocations for ultra-stable mechanical properties. Acta Mater2018;
150: 360–372.
317.
BaigZMamatOMustaphaM.Recent progress on the dispersion and the strengthening effect of carbon nanotubes and Graphene-Reinforced metal nanocomposites: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci2018;
43: 1–46. 8436 (December).
318.
FleckNAAshbyMFHutchinsonJW.The role of geometrically necessary dislocations in giving material strengthening. Scripta Mater2003;
48: 179–183.
319.
DongSZhouJHuiD, et al.
Size dependent strengthening mechanisms in carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
68: 356–364.
320.
AngKKAhmedKS.An improved shear-lag model for carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng2013;
50: 7–14.
321.
KuritaHEstiliMKwonH, et al.
Load-bearing contribution of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on tensile response of aluminum. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
68: 133–139.
322.
HansenN.Hall-petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr Mater2004;
51: 801–806.
323.
LiCLMeiQSLiJY, et al.
Hall-petch relations and strengthening of Al-ZnO composites in view of grain size relative to interparticle spacing. Scr Mater2018;
153: 27–30.
324.
SmallmanRENganAHW.Physical metallurgy and advanced materials.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2007.
325.
ArsenaultRJShiN.Dislocation generation due to differences between the coefficients of thermal expansion. Mater Sci Eng1986;
81: 175–187.
326.
NardoneVCPrewoKM.On the strength of discontinuous silicon carbide reinforced aluminum composites. Scr Metall1986;
20: 43–48.
327.
DujardinEEbbesenTWHiuraH, et al.
Capillarity and wetting of carbon nanotubes. Science1994;
265: 1850–1852.
328.
GeorgeRKashyapKTRahulR, et al.
Strengthening in carbon nanotube/aluminium (CNT/Al) composites. Scr Mater2005;
53: 1159–1163.
329.
HullDBaconDJ.Introduction to dislocations.
Oxford:
Elsevier, 2011.
330.
OrowanE.Zur Kristallplastizität. III—Über den Mechanismus des Gleitvorganges. Z Physik1934;
89: 634–659.
331.
ShainaPRGeorgeLYadavV, et al.
Estimating the thermal expansion coefficient of graphene: the role of graphene-substrate interactions. J Phys: Condens Matter2016;
28: 085301.
332.
WilsonAJC.The thermal expansion of aluminium from 0° to 650°C. Proc Phys Soc1941;
53: 235–244.
333.
DixitSMahataAMahapatraDR, et al.
Multi-layer graphene reinforced aluminum—manufacturing of high strength composite by friction stir alloying. Compos Part B Eng2018;
136: 63–71.
334.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.
Development of magnesium-graphene nanoplatelets composite. J Compos Mater2015;
49: 285–293.
335.
FengXMYanZ-A.Nanocomposite hydrothermal synthesis and application to biosensor. Chin J Inorg Chem2013;
29: 1051–1056.
336.
LouXPanHZhuS, et al.
Synthesis of silver nanoprisms on reduced graphene oxide for high-performance catalyst. Catal Commun2015;
69: 43–47.
337.
YuMShaoDLuF, et al.
ZnO/graphene nanocomposite fabricated by high energy ball milling with greatly enhanced lithium storage capability. Electrochem Commun2013;
34: 312–315.
338.
WangZPWuGLHeY.The preparation and characterization of zno/graphene nanocomposites. AMM2014;
597: 21–27.
339.
HuangYWangLSunX.Sandwich-structured graphene@Fe3O4@carbon nanocomposites with enhanced electromagnetic absorption properties. Mater Lett2015;
144: 26–29.
340.
LiXZhengXShaoJ, et al.
Synergistic ternary composite (carbon/Fe 3 O 4 @graphene) with hollow microspherical and robust structure for Li-Ion storage.Chem Eur J2016;
22: 376–381.
341.
ÁvilaAda CruzDNascimentoH, et al. Graphene-based hybrid composites. In: Graphene science handbook. London: Routledge, 2016, pp. 517–528.
342.
KumarHGPXaviorMA.Assessment of mechanical and tribological properties of Al 2024- SiC—graphene hybrid composites. Procedia Eng2017;
174: 992–999.
343.
RashadMPanFGuoW, et al.
Effect of alumina and silicon carbide hybrid reinforcements on tensile, compressive and microhardness behavior of Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy. Mater Charact2015;
106: 382–389.
344.
RashadMPanFAsifM, et al.
Improved mechanical proprieties of “magnesium based composites” with titanium-aluminum hybrids. J Magnes Alloy2015;
3: 1–9.
345.
PonomarenkoLASchedinFKatsnelsonMI, et al.
Chaotic dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science2008;
320: 356–358.
346.
BaoRHuangLLaiYC, et al.
Conductance fluctuations in chaotic bilayer graphene quantum dots. Phys Rev E2015;
92.
347.
ShimJKimY-HParkJ-H.Theoretical analysis and experimental optimization of graphene/TMD heterojunction barristors. ECS Trans2016;
75: 43–48.
348.
HammamAMMSchmidtMEMuruganathanM, et al.
Sharp switching behaviour in graphene nanoribbon P-n junction.Carbon2017;
121: 399–407.
ChoiWAlwarappanS.Graphene-based biosensors and gas sensors. Graphene2018; 248–277.
352.
CheianovVVFal'koVAltshulerBL.Veselago lens for electrons: focusing and caustics in graphene p-n junctions. Science2007;
315: 1252–1255.
353.
ZhaoYWyrickJNattererFD, et al.
Creating and probing electron whispering-gallery modes in graphene. Science2015;
348: 672–675.
354.
ReddyDRegisterLFBanerjeeSK. Bilayer graphene vertical tunneling field effect transistor. In: Device research conference—conference digest, DRC. New York: IEEE, 2012, pp. 73–74.
LiXZhuHWangK, et al.
Graphene-on-silicon schottky junction solar cells. Adv Mater2010;
22: 2743–2748.
357.
ChenSYuXZhangM, et al.
A graphene oxide/oxygen deficient molybdenum oxide nanosheet bilayer as a hole transport layer for efficient polymer solar cells. J Mater Chem A2015;
3: 18380–18383.
358.
KohWSGanCHPhuaWK, et al.
The potential of graphene as an ITO replacement in organic solar cells: an optical perspective. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron2014;
20: 36--42.
359.
YanLZhangYZhangX, et al.
Single layer graphene electrodes for quantum dot-light emitting diodes. Nanotechnology2015;
26: 135201.
360.
TaoLQSunHLiuY, et al.
Flexible graphene sound device based on laser reduced graphene. Appl Phys Lett2017;
111: 103104.
361.
SukJWKirkKHaoY, et al.
Thermoacoustic sound generation from monolayer graphene for transparent and flexible sound sources. Adv Mater2012;
24: 6342–6347.
362.
TianHXieDYangY, et al.
Single-layer graphene sound-emitting devices: experiments and modeling. Nanoscale2012;
4: 2272–2277.
363.
LeeKRJangSHJungI.Acoustic performance of dual-electrode electrostatic sound generators based on CVD graphene on polyimide film. Nanotechnology2018;
29: 325502.
ChenYXuJYangY, et al.
Enhanced electrochemical performance of laser scribed graphene films decorated with manganese dioxide nanoparticles. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron2016;
27: 2564–2573.
366.
El-KadyMFStrongVDubinS, et al.
Laser scribing of high-performance and flexible graphene-based electrochemical capacitors. Science2012;
335: 1326–1330.
367.
DikinDAStankovichSZimneyEJ, et al.
Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature2016;
448: 457–460.
368.
BunchJSVan Der ZandeAMVerbridgeSS, et al.
Electromechanical resonators from graphene sheets. Science2007;
315: 490–493.
369.
EichlerAMoserJChasteJ, et al.
Nonlinear damping in mechanical resonators made from carbon nanotubes and graphene. Nature Nanotech2011;
6: 339–342.
370.
AdhikariSChowdhuryR.Zeptogram sensing from gigahertz vibration: graphene based nanosensor. Phys E Low-Dimens SystNanostruct2012;
44: 1528–1534.
371.
SinghVSenguptaSSolankiHS, et al.
Probing thermal expansion of graphene and modal dispersion at low-temperature using graphene nanoelectromechanical systems resonators. Nanotechnology2010;
21: 165204.
372.
KimYJChaJYHamH, et al.
Preparation of piezoresistive nano smart hybrid material based on graphene. Curr Appl Phys2011;
11: S350–S352.
WangQArashB.A review on applications of carbon nanotubes and graphenes as nano-resonator sensors. Comput Mater Sci2014;
82: 350–360.
382.
VerbridgeSSCraigheadHGParpiaJM.A megahertz nanomechanical resonator with room temperature quality factor over a million. Appl Phys Lett2008;
92: 013112.
383.
WangXTianHXieW, et al.
Observation of a giant two-dimensional band-piezoelectric effect on biaxial-strained graphene. NPG Asia Mater2015;
7: e154–e154.
384.
Da Cunha RodriguesGZelenovskiyPRomanyukK, et al.
Strong piezoelectricity in single-layer graphene deposited on SiO2 grating substrates.Nat Commun2015;
6: 1–6.
385.
SunCBoutilierMSHAuH, et al.
Mechanisms of molecular permeation through nanoporous graphene membranes. Langmuir2014;
30: 675–682.
386.
WangXGuoXShaoH, et al. Methods, performances and mechanisms of separation membrane modified by graphene and graphene oxide. Prog Chem 2015; 27: 1470.
387.
Cohen-TanugiDGrossmanJC.Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Lett2012;
12: 3602–3608.
388.
Cohen-TanugiDGrossmanJC.Nanoporous graphene as a reverse osmosis membrane: Recent insights from theory and simulation. Desalination2015;
366: 59–70.
389.
ZhangJYangSChenZ, et al.
Graphene encapsulated SiC nanoparticles as tribology-favoured nanofillers in aluminium composite. Compos Part B Eng2019;
162: 445–453.
