This contribution presents an approach to generate unit-cell models of structural stitched non-crimp fabric composites. Resin-rich regions and out-of-plane undulations caused by the stitching yarn are represented by initially straight discretised lines, while the stitching yarn is represented initially by a single discretised line which can be transformed into a multi-line configuration to model stitch cross-section variations. The discretised lines are shaped by geometrical operations with a contact treatment and boundary conditions being used to account, respectively, for line interactions and to control the shape of the bottom and top surfaces of each lamina respectively. A fiber-reinforced distorted zone with local variations in fiber volume fraction and fiber direction is modelled in cross-sections of the lamina in a post-processing step. Models for different stacking sequences and stitching parameters are then automatically generated and subsequently being in the stiffness calculation and damage initiation assessment using finite element based mechanical simulations.
DransfieldKBaillieCMaiY.Improving the delamination resistance of cfrp by stitching a review. Compos Sci Technol1994;
50: 305–317.
2.
ShuDMaiY.Delamination buckling with bridging. Compos Sci Technol1993;
47: 25–33.
3.
HeßHHimmelN.Structurally stitched NCF CFRP laminates. Part 1: experimental characterization of in-plane and out-of-plane properties. Compos Sci Technol2011;
71: 549–568.
4.
VelmuruganRSolaimuruganS.Improvements in mode I interlaminar fracture toughness and in-plane mechanical properties of stitched glass/polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 61–69.
5.
TanKWatanabeNIwahoriY, et al.
Effect of stitch density and stitch thread thickness on compression after impact strength and response of stitched composites. Compos Sci Technol2012;
72: 587–598.
6.
WoodMSunXTongL, et al.
The effect of stitch distribution on mode I delamination toughness of stitched laminated composites–experimental results and fea simulation. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 1058–1072.
7.
WuEWangJ.Behavior of stitched laminates under in-plane tensile and transverse impact loading. J Compos Mater1995;
29: 2254–2279.
8.
MouritzALeongKHerszbergI.A review of the effect of stitching on the in-plane mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf1997;
28: 979–991.
9.
YudhantoALubineauGVenturaI, et al.
Damage characteristics in 3D stitched composites with various stitch parameters under in-plane tension. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
71: 17–31.
MouritzACoxB.A mechanistic interpretation of the comparative in-plane mechanical properties of 3D woven, stitched and pinned composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2010;
41: 709–728.
12.
AspLEdgrenFSjögrenA. Effects of stitch pattern on the mechanical properties of non-crimp fabric composites. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM-11), 31 May – June 3, 2004, Rhodes, Greece.
13.
VallonsKAdolphsGLucasP, et al.
The influence of the stitching pattern on the internal geometry, quasi-static and fatigue mechanical properties of glass fibre non-crimp fabric composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2014;
56: 272–279.
TruongTVettoriMLomovS, et al.
Carbon composites based on multi-axial multi-ply stitched preforms. Part 4: mechanical properties of composites and damage observation. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2005;
36: 1207–1221.
16.
MikhalukDTruongTBorovkovA, et al.
Experimental observations and finite element modelling of damage initiation and evolution in carbon/epoxy non-crimp fabric composites. Eng Fract Mech2008;
75: 2751–2766.
17.
YudhantoAWatanabeNIwahoriY, et al.
Effect of stitch density on tensile properties and damage mechanisms of stitched carbon/epoxy composites. Compos B Eng2013;
46: 151–165.
18.
AonoYHirotaKLeeS, et al.
Fatigue damage of GFRP laminates consisting of stitched unit layers. Int J Fatig2008;
30: 1720–1728.
19.
LomovSIvanovDVerpoestI, et al.
Meso-fe modelling of textile composites: road map, data flow and algorithms. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 1870–1891.
20.
PiezelBMercatorisBTrabelsiW, et al.
Bending effect on the risk for delamination at the reinforcement/matrix interface of 3D woven fabric composite using a shell-like RVE. Compos Struct2012;
94: 2343–2357.
21.
MouritzACoxB.A mechanistic approach to the properties of stitched laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2000;
31: 1–27.
22.
MattssonDJoffeRVarnaJ.Methodology for characterization of internal structure parameters governing performance in NCF composites. Compos B Eng2007;
38: 44–57.
23.
LomovSBelovEBischoffT, et al.
Carbon composites based on multiaxial multiply stitched preforms. Part 1: geometry of the preform. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2002;
33: 1171–1183.
24.
FarleyGDickinsonL.Removal of surface loop from stitched composites can improve compression and compression-after-impact strengths. J Reinf Plast Compos1992;
11: 633–642.
25.
WeiYZhangJ.Characterization of microstructure in stitched unidirectional composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2008;
39: 815–824.
26.
JoffeRMattssonDModniksJ, et al.
Compressive failure analysis of non-crimp fabric composites with large out-of-plane misalignment of fiber bundles. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2005;
36: 1030–1046.
27.
DrapierSWisnomM.A finite-element investigation of the interlaminar shear behaviour of non-crimp-fabric-based composites. Compos Sci Technol1999;
59: 2351–2362.
28.
DrapierSWisnomM.Finite-element investigation of the compressive strength of non-crimp-fabric-based composites. Compos Sci Technol1999;
59: 1287–1297.
29.
EdgrenFAspL.Approximate analytical constitutive model for non-crimp fabric composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2005;
36: 173–181.
30.
MattssonDJoffeRVarnaJ.Damage in NCF composites under tension: effect of layer stacking sequence. Eng Fract Mech2008;
75: 2666–2682.
31.
LoenderslootRLomovSAkkermanR, et al.
Carbon composites based on multiaxial multiply stitched preforms. Part V: geometry of sheared biaxial fabrics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2006;
37: 103–113.
32.
FarleyG.A mechanism responsible for reducing compression strength of through-the-thickness reinforced composite material. J Compos Mater1992;
26: 1784–1795.
33.
NordlundMLundstromT.Numerical study of the local permeability of noncrimp fabrics. J Compos Mater2005;
39: 929–947.
34.
HesHRothYHimmelN.Elastic constants estimation of stitched NCF CFRP laminates based on a finite element unit-cell model. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 1081–1095.
35.
HeßHHimmelN.Structurally stitched NCF CFRP laminates. Part 2: finite element unit cell based prediction of in-plane strength. Compos Sci Technol2011;
71: 569–585.
36.
KurashikiTWatanabeNMatsushimaM, et al. Verpoest, Effects of stitching parameters on damage development for non-crimp fabric composites under tensile loading. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM-15), 24–28 June 2012, Venice, Italy.
37.
KurashikiTHamadaKHondaS, et al. Mechanical behaviors of non-crimp fabric composites based on multi-scale analysis. In: 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, 27–31 July 2009, Edinburgh, UK.
38.
GonzálezAGracianiEParísF.Prediction of in-plane stiffness properties of non-crimp fabric laminates by means of 3D finite element analysis. Compos Sci Technol2008;
68: 121–131.
39.
FerreiraLGracianiEParísF.Modelling the waviness of the fibres in non-crimp fabric composites using 3D finite element models with straight tows. Compos Struct2014;
107: 79–87.
40.
FerreiraLGracianiEParísF.Three dimensional finite element study of the behaviour and failure mechanism of non-crimp fabric composites under in-plane compression. Compos Struct2016;
149: 106–113.
41.
NetzJHannemannBSchmeerS.Micro-leveled modeling of structural stitched FRP joints as energy absorbing rupture points. Compos Struct2016;
157: 131–140.
42.
PierreuxGWuLVan HemelrijckD, et al.
Evaluation of microdamage initiation in z-pinned laminates by means of automated RVE computations. Compos Struct2018;
206: 104–115.
43.
PierreuxGVan HemelrijckDMassartTJ.Automated generation of 3D orthogonal woven composites RVEs including yarn cross-section variations. Compos Sci Technol2019;
176: 90–102.
44.
ZhouGSunXWangY.Multi-chain digital element analysis in textile mechanics. Compos Sci Technol2004;
64: 239–244.
45.
DaelemansLFaesJAllaouiS, et al.
Finite element simulation of the woven geometry and mechanical behaviour of a 3D woven dry fabric under tensile and shear loading using the digital element method. Compos Sci Technol2016;
137: 177–187.
46.
GreenSMatveevMLongA, et al.
Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry. Compos Struct2014;
118: 284–293.
47.
ThompsonASaidBEIvanovD, et al.
High fidelity modelling of the compression behaviour of 2D woven fabrics. Int J Solids Struct2018;
154: 104–113.
48.
SaidBEGreenSHallettS.Kinematic modelling of 3D woven fabric deformation for structural scale features. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2014;
57: 95–107.
49.
DurvilleD.Simulation of the mechanical behaviour of woven fabrics at the scale of fibers. Int J Mater Form2010;
3: 1241–1251.
50.
PierreuxG.Automated unit-cell model generation for micro-mechanical simulations of 3D reinforced composites. PhD Thesis, Université libre de Bruxelles and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, 2018.
51.
SononBFrancoisBMassartTJ.A unified level set based methodology for fast generation of complex microstructural multi-phase RVEs. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2012;
223-224: 103–122.
52.
WintibaBSononBKamelK, et al.
An automated procedure for the generation and conformal discretization of 3D woven composites RVEs. Compos Struct2017;
180: 955–971.
53.
LomovSHuysmansGLuoY, et al.
Textile composites: modelling strategies. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2001;
32: 1379–1394.
54.
SendeckyjGPWangSSSteven JohnsonW, et al.
Mechanics of composite materials: past, present, and future.J Compos Technol Res1989;
11: 3–14.
55.
RosenB.Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA J1964;
2: 1985–1991.
56.
KaddourAHintonMSmithP, et al.
Mechanical properties and details of composite laminates for the test cases used in the third world-wide failure exercise. J Compos Mater2013;
47: 2427–2442.
57.
TuronACamanhoPPCostaJ, et al.
A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading. Mech Mater2006;
38: 1072–1089.
58.
BogdanovichAKarahanMLomovS, et al.
Quasi-static tensile behavior and damage of carbon/epoxy composite reinforced with 3D non-crimp orthogonal woven fabric. Mech Mater2013;
62: 14–31.
59.
IvanovDLomovSBogdanovichA, et al.
A comparative study of tensile properties of non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave and multi-layer plain weave e-glass composites. Part 2: comprehensive experimental results. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2009;
40: 1144–1157.
60.
PuckASchürmannH. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. In: Failure criteria in fibre-reinforced-polymer composites. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, 2004. pp. 832–876.
