This work presents an experimental study characterizing the crush performance of hollow cylindrical tubes made with prepreg platelet molding compound (PPMC). PPMC is a composite material system that uses platelets from chopped and slit unidirectional prepreg as the basis for a molding compound. This material system has a higher fiber volume fraction and better mechanical properties than traditional short fiber systems and can be molded into complex geometries unlike continuous fiber systems. As such, this material system shows promise for use with complex structural members in vehicles. The failure morphology and specific energy absorption of the material are evaluated with different thickness-to-diameter geometries and test speeds. In addition, this work investigates how PPMC components compare to traditional continuous fiber components and finds that PPMC performs as well as continuous fiber layups with similar effective laminate stiffnesses.
LandryBHubertP. Process modelling of discontinuous long fibre carbon/polyether ether ketone composites: defect prediction. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 2505–2515.
2.
Picher-MartelGPLevyAHubertP. Compression moulding of Carbon/PEEK Randomly-Oriented Strands composites: a 2D Finite Element model to predict the squeeze flow behaviour. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 81: 69–77.
3.
VisweswaraiahSBOhlmannNLessardL, et al.Flow-control and hybridization strategies for thermoplastic stiffened panels of long discontinuous fibers. J Reinf Plast Compos2017; 36: 1327–1342.
4.
FavaloroAJSommerDEDenosBR, et al.Simulation of prepreg platelet compression molding: Method and orientation validation. J Rheol2018; 62: 1443–1455.
5.
Sommer DE, Favaloro AJ, and Pipes RB. Prepreg platelet morphology and scale effects on molding processability. In: Proceedings of the American society for composites - 32nd technical conference, West Lafayette, 23–25 October 2017.
6.
KravchenkoSGSommerDEDenosBR, et al.Structure-property relationship for a prepreg platelet molded composite with engineered meso-morphology. Compos Struct2019; 210: 430–445.
7.
KravchenkoSGSommerDEDenosBR, et al.Tensile properties of a stochastic prepreg platelet molded composite. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 124: 105507.
8.
SeleznevaMLessardL. Characterization of mechanical properties of randomly oriented strand thermoplastic composites. J Compos Mater2015; 50: 2833–2851.
9.
FeraboliPPeitsoEDeleoF, et al.Characterization of prepreg-based discontinuous carbon fiber/epoxy systems. J Reinf Plast Compos2009; 28: 1191–1214.
10.
Eguémann N, Giger L, Masania K, et al. Processing of characterisation of carbon fibre reinforced PEEK with discontinuous architecture. In: 16th European Conference on Composite Materials. Seville, Spain, 2014.
11.
Landry B. Experimental study and numerical simulation of defect formation during compression moulding of discontinuous long fibre carbon/PEEK composites. PhD Thesis, McGill University, 2015.
12.
WanYTakahashiJ. Tensile and compressive properties of chopped carbon fiber tapes reinforced thermoplastics with different fiber lengths and molding pressures. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 87: 271–281.
13.
Tuttle M, Shifman T and Boursier B. Simplifying certification of discontinuous composite material forms for primary aircraft structures. In: International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 17–20 May 2010.
14.
VisweswaraiahSBSeleznevaMLessardL, et al.Mechanical characterisation and modelling of randomly oriented strand architecture and their hybrids-A general review. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 548–580.
15.
MatsuoTKanMFurukawaK, et al.Numerical modeling and analysis for axial compressive crushing of randomly oriented thermoplastic composite tubes based on the out-of-plane damage mechanism. Compos Struct2017; 181: 368–378.
16.
TurnerTAHarperLTWarriorNA, et al.Energy absorption performance of meso-scale discontinuous carbon fibre composites. Int J Veh Struct Syst2011; 3: 80–86.
17.
JacobGCStarbuckJMFellersJF, et al.Crashworthiness of various random chopped carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite materials and their strain rate dependence. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 101: 1477–1486.
18.
JacobGCStarbuckJMFellersJF, et al.Effect of fiber volume fraction, fiber length and fiber tow size on the energy absorption of chopped carbon fiber-polymer composites. Polym Compos2005; 26: 293–305.
19.
HullD. A unified approach to progressive crushing of fiber-reinforced composite tubes. Compos Sci Technol1991; 40: 377–421.
CarruthersJJKettleAPRobinsonAM. Energy absorption capability and crashworthiness of composite material structures: a review. Appl Mech Rev1998; 51: 635.
22.
HamadaHCoppolaJHullD, et al.Comparison of energy absorption of carbon/epoxy and carbon/PEEK composite tubes. Composites1992; 23: 245–252.
JiménezMAMiraveteALarrodéE, et al.Effect of trigger geometry on energy absorption in composite profiles. Compos Struct2000; 48: 107–111.
25.
ThuisHGMetzVH. The influence of trigger configurations and laminate lay-up on the failure mode of composite crush cylinders. Compos Struct1994; 28: 131–137.
26.
FarleyGLWoltermanRLKennedyJM. Effects of crushing surface roughness on the crushing characteristics of composite tubes. J Am Helicopter Soc1992; 37: 53–60.
27.
MamalisAGManolakosDEDemosthenousGA, et al.Analysis of failure mechanisms observed in axial collapse of thin-walled circular fibreglass composite tubes. Thin-Walled Struct1996; 24: 335–352.
28.
MamalisAManolakosDIoannidisM, et al.Crashworthy characteristics of axially statically compressed thin-walled square CFRP composite tubes: experimental. Compos Struct2004; 63: 347–360.
29.
RamakrishnaSHamadaH. Energy absorption characteristics of crash worthy structural composite materials. Key Eng Mater1998; 141–143: 585–622.
30.
LukaszewiczDAutomotive composite structures for crashworthiness. In: ElmarakbiA (ed). Advanced composite materials for automotive applications: structural integrity and crashworthiness, chapter 5, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2014, pp. 99–127.
31.
ReidSRZhouGHancoxNL. Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures, chapter 1, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2000, pp. 1–32.
32.
LuGYuTX. Energy absorption of structures and materials, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2003. .
33.
HamadaHRamakrishnaSMaekawaZ, et al.Effect of cooling rate on the energy absorption capability of carbon fibre/PEEK composite tubes. Polym Polym Compos1995; 3: 99–104.
34.
TurnerTARobitailleFWarriorNA, et al.Effect of resin formulation on crash energy absorbing composite structures made by RTM. Plast Rubber Compos2002; 31: 49–57.
35.
Di BenedettoRMRaponiOAJunqueriaDM, et al.Crashworthiness and impact energy absorption study considering the CF/PA commingled composite processing optimization. Mater Res2017; 20: 792–799.
36.
ThorntonP. The crush behavior of pultruded tubes at high strain rates. J Compos Mater1990; 24: 594–615.
37.
HanagudSCraigJSriramP, et al.Energy absorption behavior of graphite epoxy composite sine webs. J Compos Mater1989; 23: 448–459.
38.
MamalisAManolakosDIoannidisM, et al.On the response of thin-walled CFRP composite tubular components subjected to static and dynamic axial compressive loading: experimental. Compos Struct2005; 69: 407–420.
39.
StarbuckJMAdamsDOCourteauM. American society for composites, Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications Inc, 2017.
40.
ThorntonPEdwardsP. Energy absorption in composite tubes. J Compos Mater1982; 16: 521–545.
41.
Bannerman DC and Kindervater CM. Crash energy absorption properties of composite structural elements. In: Fourth international SAMPE European chapter, Bordeaux, France, 1984, pp.155–167.
42.
FarleyGL. Energy absorption of composite materials. J Compos Mater1983; 17: 267–279.
43.
FarleyGL. The effects of crushing speed on the energy-absorption capability of composite tubes. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 1314–1329.
44.
HamadaHRamakrishnaS. Composite materials: testing and design, Volume 12, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1994, pp. 182–197.
45.
MamalisARobinsonMManolakosD, et al.Crashworthy capability of composite material structures. Compos Struct1997; 37: 109–134.
46.
RamakrishnaS. Microstructural design of composite materials for crashworthy structural applications. Mater Des1997; 18: 167–173.
47.
TaoWHRobertsonREThorntonPH. Effects of material properties and crush conditions on the crush energy absorption of fiber composite rods. Compos Sci Technol1993; 47: 405–418.
48.
Lukaszewicz D, Engel S, Boegle C, et al. Experimental investigation of composite structures during dynamic impact. In: 15th European conference on composite materials, Venice, Italy, 24–28 June 2012.
49.
AlghamdiA. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin-Walled Struct2001; 39: 189–213.
50.
AbramowiczWJonesN. Dynamic axial crushing of circular tubes. Int J Impact Eng1984; 2: 263–281.
51.
JonesNAbramowiczW. Static and dynamic axial crushing of circular and square tubes. Metal Form Impact Mech1985; 10: 225–247.
52.
AlexanderJM. An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading. Q J Mech Appl Math1960; 13: 10–15.
53.
JacobGCStarbuckJMSimunovicS, et al.New Test method for determining energy absorption mechanisms in polymer composite plates. Polym Compos2003; 24: 706–715.
54.
JacobGCStarbuckJMSimunovicS, et al.Energy absorption in glass-reinforced continuous strand mat composites. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90: 3222–3232.
55.
JacobGCFellersJFStarbuckJM, et al.Crashworthiness of automotive composite material systems. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 92: 3218–3225.
56.
WarriorNATurnerTACooperE, et al.Effects of boundary conditions on the energy absorption of thin-walled polymer composite tubes under axial crushing. Thin-Walled Struct2008; 46: 905–913.
Blanchard PJ, Bank DH, Dahl JS, et al. CF-SMC technology for high volume manufacturing. In: SPE auto composites conference and exhibition. Novi, MI, 5–7 September 2018.
59.
WhitneyJMPaganoNJPipesRB. Design and fabrication of tubular specimens for composite characterization. J Mater1971; 6: 52–67.
60.
AdvaniSGTuckerCL. The use of tensors to describe and predict fiber orientation in short fiber composites. J Rheol1987; 31: 751–784.
