In this investigation, particulate composites materials made of epoxy resin matrix with magnetite particles were fabricated via additive manufacturing with the direct ink writing technique. Magnetite is an inexpensive material and the direct ink writing process is not only inexpensive but also easy to adapt to any material. A total of eight formulations were investigated, from which only four were feasible for the printing process: 32.6, 33.6, 35.4 and 41 wt.% of particles. The composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, compressive strength, particle size distribution, density, and ductility. Results showed that composites exhibit very competitive mechanical properties even though the process was not vacuum assisted, therefore enabling them to be used in large scale and in other structural applications. Composite can be used in electromagnetic shielding.
OlakanmiEOCochraneRFDalgarnoKW. A review on selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM) of aluminium alloy powders: processing, microstructure, and properties. Prog Mater Sci2015; 74: 401–477.
6.
LiY-YLiL-TLiB. Direct ink writing of 3–3 piezoelectric composite. J Alloys Compd2015; 620: 125–128.
7.
FrketicJDickensTRamakrishnanS. Automated manufacturing and processing of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites: an additive review of contemporary and modern techniques for advanced materials manufacturing. Addit Manuf2017; 14: 69–86.
8.
ChenY, et al.A biocompatible thermoset polymer binder for Direct Ink Writing of porous titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 95: 160–165.
9.
ProlongoSGJimenez-SuarezAMoricheR, et al.In situ processing of epoxy composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol2013; 86: 185–191.
10.
ReveloCFColoradoHA. 3D printing of kaolinite clay ceramics using the Direct Ink Writing (DIW) technique. Ceram Int2018; 44: 5673–5682.
11.
FriedrichLBegleyM. In situ characterization of low-viscosity direct ink writing: stability, wetting, and rotational flows. J Colloid Interf Sci2018; 529: 599–609.
12.
HanemannTSzabóDV. Polymer-nanoparticle composites: from synthesis to modern applications. Materials2010; 3: 3468–3517.
13.
ArbaouiY, et al.3D printed ferromagnetic composites for microwave applications. J Mater Sci2017; 52: 4988–4996.
14.
MohanP. A critical review: the modification, properties, and applications of epoxy resins. Polym Plast Technol Eng2013; 52: 107–125.
15.
SrivastavaAKMohanP. Synthesis, reactions, and properties of modified epoxy resins. J Macromol Sci1997; 37: 687–716.
16.
JiangD, et al.Electromagnetic interference shielding polymers and nanocomposites – a review. Polym Rev2019; 59(2): 280–337.
17.
LiJ, et al.Flexible, conductive, porous, fibrillar polymer – gold nanocomposites with enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding and mechanical properties. J Mater Chem C2017; 5: 1095–1105.
18.
BolhassaniMSayyahmaneshM. A study on mechanical properties of cement paste using magnetite-silica nano-composites. Adv Cem Res2015; 27: 571–580.
19.
Ostertag W, Wienand H and Bauer R. Preparation of magnetite pigments: control of particle size. Google Patents, 1987.
20.
FlorezRColoradoHAAlajoA, et al.The material characterization and gamma attenuation properties of Portland cement-Fe3O4 composites for potential dry cask applications. Prog Nucl Energy2019; 111: 65–73.
21.
McNabTKFoxRABoyleAJF. Some magnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) microcrystals. J Appl Phys1968; 39: 5703–5711.
22.
GuanHLiuSDuanY, et al.Cement based electromagnetic shielding and absorbing building materials. Cem Concr Compos2006; 28: 468–474.
23.
BashterIIAbdoAESAbdel-AzimMS. Magnetite ores with steel or basalt for concrete radiation shielding. Jpn J Appl Phys1997; 36: 3692.
24.
YavuzCT, et al.Pollution magnet: nano-magnetite for arsenic removal from drinking water. Environ Geochem Health2010; 32: 327–334.
25.
WuN-LWangS-YHanC-Y, et al.Electrochemical capacitor of magnetite in aqueous electrolytes. J Power Sources2003; 113: 173–178.
26.
LuA-HSalabasESchüthF. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int2007; 46: 1222–1244.
27.
PaluvaiNRMohantySNayakSK. Synthesis and modifications of epoxy resins and their composites: a review. Polym Plast Technol Eng2014; 53: 1723–1758.
Callister Jr. W and Rethwisch D. Fundamentals of materials science and engineering: an integrated approach. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
30.
Hugh S, David C and Michael A. Materials: engineering, science, processing and design. Vol. 23. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008.
31.
WanY-JGongL-XTangL-C, et al.Mechanical properties of epoxy composites filled with silane-functionalized graphene oxide. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 64: 79–89.
32.
JosephKThomasSPavithranC. Dynamic mechanical properties of short sisal fiber reinforced low density polyethylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos1993; 12: 139–155.
33.
FiedlerBGojnyFHWichmannMHG, et al.Fundamental aspects of nano-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 3115–3125.
34.
YoungRJKinlochIAGongL, et al.The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1459–1476.
35.
CrespoMMéndezNGonzálezM, et al.Synergistic effect of magnetite nanoparticles and carbon nanofibres in electromagnetic absorbing composites. Carbon2014; 74: 63–72.
36.
WangZSongMSunC, et al.Effects of particle size and distribution on the mechanical properties of SiC reinforced Al-Cu alloy composites. Mater Sci Eng A2011; 528: 1131–1137.
37.
Shaw SJ. Additives and modifiers for epoxy resins. In: Bryan Ellis (eds) Chemistry and technology of epoxy resins. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1993, pp.117–143.
38.
UtaloffK, et al.Improvement of fracture toughness and glass transition temperature of DGEBA-based epoxy systems using toughening and crosslinking modifiers. Polym Eng Sci2019; 59.
39.
ColoradoHAHielCHahnHT. Influence of particle size distribution of wollastonite on the mechanical properties of CBPCs (chemically bonded phosphate ceramics). Process Prop Adv Ceram Compos III2011; 225: 85–98.
