In this paper, the propagation of radial matrix cracks and debond cracks at the coating/matrix interface in unidirectional carbon fiber structural micro-battery composite are studied numerically. The micro battery consists of a solid electrolyte-coated carbon fiber embedded in an electrochemically active polymer matrix. Stress analysis shows that high hoop stress in the matrix during charging may initiate radial matrix cracks at the coating/matrix interface. Several 2-D finite element models of the transverse plane with different arrangements of fibers and other matrix cracks were used to analyze the radial matrix crack growth from the coating/matrix interface of the central fiber in a composite with a square packing of fibers. Energy release rates of radial cracks along two potential propagation paths are calculated under pure electrochemical loading. The presence of a radial matrix crack imposes changes in the stress distribution along the coating/matrix interface, making debonding relevant for consideration. Results for energy release rates show that the debond crack growth is governed by mode II.
GarrettKWBaileyJE. Multiple transverse fracture in 90 ° cross-ply laminates of a glass fibre-reinforced polyester. J Mater Sci1977; 12: 157–168.
2.
McCartneyLN. Predicting transverse crack formation in cross-ply laminates this article represents the author's contribution to a world-wide exercise to confirm the state-of-the-art for predicting failure in composites, organised by Hinton and Soden. Compos Sci Technol1998; DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00142-X.
3.
NairnJAHuSBarkJS. A critical evaluation of theories for predicting microcracking in composite laminates. J Mater Sci1993; 28: 5099–5111.
4.
DvorakGJLawsN. Analysis of progressive matrix cracking in composite laminates. II. First ply failure. J Compos Mater1987; 21: 309–329.
5.
VarnaJBerglundLAEricsonML. Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites. 2. Modelling. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf1997; 28: 317–326.
6.
BouhalaLMakradiABelouettarS, et al.Modelling of failure in long fibres reinforced composites by X-FEM and cohesive zone model. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 55: 352–361.
7.
KushchVIShmegeraSVBrøndstedP, et al.Numerical simulation of progressive debonding in fiber reinforced composite under transverse loading. Int J Eng Sci2011; 49: 17–29.
8.
TávaraLManticVGracianiE, et al.Modelling interfacial debonds in unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites under biaxial transverse loads. Compos Struct2016; 136: 305–312.
9.
ToyaM. A crack along the interface of a circular inclusion embedded in an infinite solid. J Mech Phys Solids1974; 22: 325–348.
10.
ParísFCañoJCVarnaJ. The fiber-matrix interface crack – a numerical analysis using boundary elements. Int J Fract1990; 82: 11–29.
11.
SandinoCCorreaEParísF. Numerical analysis of the influence of a nearby fibre on the interface crack growth in composites under transverse tensile load. Eng Fract Mech2016; 168: 58–75.
12.
ZhuangLPupursAVarnaJ, et al.Fiber/matrix debond growth from fiber break in unidirectional composite with local hexagonal fiber clustering. Compos B Eng2016; 101: 124–131.
13.
ZhuangLTalrejaRVarnaJ. Transverse crack formation in unidirectional composites by linking of fibre/matrix debond cracks. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2018; 107: 294–303.
14.
ZhuangLPupursAVarnaJ, et al.Effects of inter-fiber spacing on fiber-matrix debond crack growth in unidirectional composites under transverse loading. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2018; 109: 463–471.
15.
Busschen At. Micromechanical modelling of the transverse strengths of unidirectional glass fibre reinforced polyester. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1996.
16.
Zhang L. Time-dependent behaviour of polymers and unidirectional polymeric composites. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1995.
17.
PennLSChouRCTWangASD, et al.The effect of matrix shrinkage on damage accumulation in composites. J Compos Mater1989; 23: 570–586.
18.
AspLEGreenhalghES. Structural power composites. Compos Sci Technol2014; 101: 41–61.
19.
JacquesEHellqvist KjellMZenkertD, et al.Expansion of carbon fibres induced by lithium intercalation for structural electrode applications. Carbon2013; 59: 246–254.
20.
ZhangW. Structure and performance of LiFePO4 cathode materials: a review. J Power Sourc2011; 196: 2962–2970.
21.
XuJGöranLindberghVarnaJ. Carbon fiber composites with battery function: stresses and dimensional changes due to Li-ion diffusion. J Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 15 January 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0021998317752825.
Hamann CH, Hamnett A and Vielstich W. Electrochemistry. 2. (completely rev. and updated ed.). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2007.
24.
Anonymous COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.2, www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
25.
DoyleMFullerTNewmanJ. Modeling of galvanostatic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. J Electrochem Soc1993; 140: 1526–1533.
26.
FullerTFDoyleMNewmanJ. Simulation and optimization of the dual lithium ion insertion cell. J Electrochem Soc1994; 141: 1–10.
27.
GabrielliGMarinaroMManciniM, et al.A new approach for compensating the irreversible capacity loss of high-energy Si/C|LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sourc2017; 351: 35–44.
28.
WilliardNHeWHendricksC, et al.Lessons learned from the 787 dreamliner issue on lithium-ion battery reliability. Energies2013; 6: 4682–4695.
29.
KimCJeongKMKimK, et al.Effects of capacity ratios between anode and cathode on electrochemical properties for lithium polymer batteries. Electrochim Acta2015; 155: 431–436.
30.
XuJLindberghGVarnaJ. Multiphysics modeling of mechanical and electrochemical phenomena in structural composites for energy storage: Single carbon fiber micro-battery. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 701–715.
31.
PupursAVarnaJ. Modeling mechanical stress and exfoliation damage in carbon fiber electrodes subjected to cyclic intercalation/deintercalation of lithium ions. Compos B Eng2014; 65: 69–79.
32.
HashinZ. Analysis of composite materials – a survey. J Appl Mech Trans ASME1983; 50: 481–505.
33.
DionisiFHarndenRZenkertD. A model to analyse deformations and stresses in structural batteries due to electrode expansions. Compos Struct2017; 179: 580–589.
34.
IhrnerNJohannissonWSielandF, et al.Structural lithium ion battery electrolytes: via reaction induced phase-separation. J Mater Chem A2017; 5: 25652–25659.
35.
IhrnerNJohanssonM. Improved performance of solid polymer electrolytes for structural batteries utilizing plasticizing co-solvents. J Appl Polym Sci. Epub ahead of print 7 February 2017. DOI: 10.1002/app.44917.
36.
AroraPWhiteREDoyleM. Capacity fade mechanisms and side reactions in lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc1998; 145: 3647–3667.
