The compressive strength of C/SiC composite at different strain rates, off-axis orientations and after high-velocity impact was studied. The compressive strength was found to be 137 ± 23, 130 ± 46 and 162 ± 33 MPa at a strain rate of 3.3 × 10−5, 3.3 × 10−3, 3.3 × 10−3 s−1, respectively. On the other hand, the compressive strength was found to be 130 ± 46, 99 ± 23 and 87 ± 9 MPa for 0°/90°, 30°/60° and 45°/45° fibre orientations to loading direction, respectively. After high-velocity impact, the residual compressive strength of C/SiC composite was found to be 58 ± 26, 44 ± 18 and 36 ± 3.5 MPa after impact with 100, 150 and 190 m/s, respectively. The formation of kink bands in fibre bundles was found to be dominant micro-mechanism for compressive failure of C/SiC composite for 0°/90° orientation. On the other hand, delamination and the fibre bundles rotation were found to be the dominant mechanism for off-axis failure of composite.
ChristinF. Design, fabrication and application of thermostructural composite like C/C, C/SiC and SiC/SiC composites. Adv Eng Mater2002; 4: 903–912.
2.
PatelMKiranMPSKumariSet al.Effect of oxidation and residual stress on mechanical properties of SiC seal coated C/SiC composite. Ceram Inter2018; 44: 1633–1640.
3.
YangC-PZhangLWangBet al.Tensile behavior of 2D-C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures: experiment and modeling. J Euro Ceram Soc2017; 37: 1281–1290.
4.
MeiM. Measurement and calculation of thermal residual stress in fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Comp Sci Tech2008; 68: 3285–3292.
5.
WangYZhangLChengL. Comparison of tensile behaviors of carbon/ceramic composites with various fiber architectures. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2013; 10: 266–275.
6.
MorscherGNCarloJADKiserJDet al.Effects of fiber architecture on matrix cracking for melt-infiltrated SiC/SiC composites. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2010; 7: 276–290.
7.
WangYZhangLChengL. Effects of carbon yarn size on the mechanical properties of plain woven C/SiC composites. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2009; 6: E1–E10.
8.
BelmonteM. Advanced ceramic materials for high temperature applications. Adv Eng Mater2006; 8: 693–703.
9.
Glass DE. Ceramic matrix composite (CMC) thermal protection systems (TPS) and hot structures for hypersonic vehicles. In: 15th AIAA space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Ohio, USA, April 2008.
10.
BuffenoirFZeppaCPichonTet al.Development and flight qualification of the C/SiC thermal protection systems for the IXV. Acta Astronaut2016; 124: 85–89.
11.
RogerRN. SiC-matrix composites: nonbrittle ceramics for thermo-structural application. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2005; 2: 75–84.
12.
PatelMSinghVSinghSet al.Micro-structural evolution during diffusion bonding of C-SiC/C-SiC composite using Ti interlayer. Mater Char2018; 135: 1633–1640.
13.
Heidenreich B. C/SiC and C/C-SiC composites. In: Narottam PB and Jacques L (eds) Ceramic matrix composites: materials, modeling and technology. Chapter 6. 1st ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015, pp.147–216.
14.
WangMLiardC. Damage and fracture of a cross woven C/SiC composite subject to compression loading. J Mater Sci1996; 31: 2065–2069.
15.
MaJXuYChengLet al.Compressive properties and fracture behavior of two and-a-half-dimensional C/SiC composites. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2007; 4: 191–195.
16.
MingshuangLYulongLFeiXet al.Dynamic compressive mechanical properties and a new constitutive model of 2D-C/SiC composites. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 489: 120–126.
17.
SuoTFanXHuGet al.Compressive behavior of C/SiC composites over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. Carbon2013; 62: 481–492.
18.
LiTFanDLuLet al.Dynamic fracture of C/SiC composites under high strain-rate loading: microstructures and mechanisms. Carbon2015; 91: 468–478.
19.
LynchCSEvansAG. Effect of off-axis loading on the tensile behavior of a ceramic-matrix composite. J Am Ceram Soc1996; 79: 3113–3123.
20.
JunLGuiqiongJBoWet al.Damage characteristics and constitutive modelling of the 2D C/SiC composite: part I – experiment and analysis. Chin J Aeronaut2014; 27: 1586–1597.
21.
KochDTushtevKHorvathJet al.Evaluation of mechanical properties and comprehensive modeling of CMC with stiff and weak matrices. Adv Sci Technol2006; 45: 1435–1443.
22.
Choi SR. Foreign object damage in ceramic matrix composites. In: Narottam PB and Jacques L (eds) Ceramic matrix composites: materials, modeling and technology. Chapter 14. 1st ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015, pp.405–429.
23.
BhattRTChoiSRCosgriffLMet al.Impact resistance of environmental barrier coated SiC/SiC composites. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 476: 8–19.
24.
BhattRTChoiSRCosgriffLMet al.Impact resistance of uncoated SiC/SiC composites. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 476: 20–28.
25.
LeijiangYZiyangFQiyouC. Low velocity impact damage evaluation of 2D C/SiC composite material. Adv Mater Res2009; 79–82: 1835–1838.
26.
MeiHHanDFarhanSet al.Impact behavior of different cross-ply aminated carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide composites under the low velocity. J Comp Mater2016; 50: 1137–1142.
27.
MeiHYuCXuYet al.Effect of impact energy on damage resistance and mechanical property of C/SiC composites under low velocity impact. Mater Sci Eng A2017; 687: 141–147.
28.
YangYXuaFGaoXet al.Impact resistance of 2D plain-woven C/SiC composites at high temperature. Mater Des2016; 90: 635–641.
29.
BrownJRChappellPJCEgglestoneGTet al.A gas-gun facility for material impact studies using low velocity, low-mass projectiles. J Phys E1989; 22: 771–774.
30.
EvansAGAdlerWF. Kinking as a mode of structural degradation in carbon fiber composites. Acta Metall1978; 26: 725–738.
31.
PinhhoSTGutkinRPimentaSet al.On longitudinal compressive failure of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer: from unidirectional to woven, and from virgin to recycled. Phil Trans R Soc A2012; 370: 1871–1905.
32.
GuptaVAnandKKryskaM. Failure mechanism of laminated carbon-carbon composite –I. Under uniaxial compression. Acta Metall Mater1994; 42: 781–795.
33.
MoranPMLiuXHShihCF. Kink band formation and band broadening in fiber composites under compressive loading. Acta Metall Mater1995; 43: 2943–2958.
