Cure process is the most crucial stage for manufacturing composite parts and final quality of the part is strongly dependent on the cure profile used in the curing process. In this paper, a novel approach based on cure simulation using finite element method and multi-objective genetic algorithm is developed to optimize cure profile for thick thermoset composites. Three objectives are considered simultaneously, which include the maximum difference in degree of cure, the maximum temperature difference, and the total cure time. Optimal Pareto front is obtained and the optimized cure profile is selected from Pareto front for the given application. A 24-mm thick unidirectional laminate is taken as an example and the results show that compared to typical cure profile, the optimized cure profile leads to approximately 56% reduction in the maximum difference in degree of cure, 71% decrease in the maximum difference in temperature during cure, and 33% reduction in the total cure time. It is also indicated that the residual stress can be remarkably decreased and the cure efficiency is significantly improved using the present method. The present method can also be applied to various geometries with various thicknesses and is able to provide an important reference for determination of cure profiles for the manufacturing of composite structures.
CiriscioliPRWangQSpringerGS. Autoclave curing – comparisons of model and test results. J Compos Mater1992; 26: 90–102.
2.
TwardowskiTELinSEGeilPH. Curing in thick composite laminates: experiment and simulation. J Compos Mater1993; 27: 216–250.
3.
MichaudDJBerisANDhurjatiPS. Thick-sectioned RTM composite manufacturing: part I – in situ cure model parameter identification and sensing. J Compos Mater2002; 36: 1175–1200.
4.
KimCTengHTuckerCLet al.The continuous cuing process for thermoset polymer composites. Part 1: modeling and demonstration. J Compos Mater1995; 29: 1222–1253.
OhJH. Prediction of temperature distribution during curing thick thermoset composite laminates. Mater Sci Forum2007; 544-545: 427–430.
7.
RaiNPitchumaniR. Optimal cure cycles for the fabrication of thermosetting-matrix composites. Polym Compos1997; 18: 566–581.
8.
Loos AC, Springer GS. Curing of epoxy matrix composites[J]. Journal of Composite Materials 1983; 17(2): 135–169.
9.
Johnston AA. An integrated model of the development of process-induced deformation in autoclave processing of composite structures. [Ph.D.]. Ann Arbor: The University of British Columbia (Canada); 1998.
10.
JoshiSCLiuXLLamYC. A numerical approach to the modeling of polymer curing in fibre-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 1003–1013.
11.
ZhuQGeubellePHLiMet al.Dimensional accuracy of thermoset composites: simulation of process-induced residual stresses. J Compos Mater2001; 35: 2171–2205.
12.
ParkHCGooNSMinKJet al.Three-dimensional cure simulation of composite structures by the finite element method. Compos Struct2003; 62: 51–57.
13.
CheungAYuYPochirajuK. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of curing of polymer composites, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, 2004.
14.
GopalAKAdaliSVerijenkoVE. Optimal temperature profiles for minimum residual stress in the cure process of polymer composites. Compos Struct2000; 48: 99–106.
15.
LiMIiiCLT. Optimal curing for thermoset matrix composites: thermochemical and consolidation considerations. Polym Compos2001; 22: 118–131.
PantelelisNVrouvakisTSpentzasK. Cure cycle design for composite materials using computer simulation and optimisation tools. Forsch Ingenieurwes2003; 67: 254–262.
18.
RuizETrochuF. Multi-criteria thermal optimization in liquid composite molding to reduce processing stresses and cycle time. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 913–924.
19.
KaiJTHsiaoKT. Improved dimensional infidelity of curve-shaped VARTM composite laminates using a multi-stage curing technique – experiments and modeling. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 762–771.
20.
CarlonePPalazzoGS. A simulation based metaheuristic optimization of the thermal cure cycle of carbon-epoxy composite laminates. [C]// American Institute of Physics Conference Series. American Institute of Physics2011; 1353: 5–10.
21.
CarlonePPalazzoGS. Composite laminates cure cycle optimisation by meta-heuristic algorithms. Int J Mater Product Technol2013; 46: 106–123.
22.
VafayanMGhoreishyMHRAbediniHet al.Development of an optimized thermal cure cycle for a complex-shape composite part using a coupled finite element/genetic algorithm technique. Iran Polym J2015; 24: 459–469.
23.
SorrentinoLBelliniC. Validation of a methodology for cure process optimization of thick composite laminates. Polym Plast Technol Eng2015; 54: 1803–1811.
24.
Tarasov I V, Shevtsov SN, Evlanov AV, et al. Model-based optimal control of polymeric composite cure in autoclave system[J]. Ifac Papersonline, Saint Petersburg, Russia 2015: 48(11): 204–210.
25.
AleksendrićDCarlonePĆirovićV. Optimization of the temperature-time curve for the curing process of thermoset matrix composites. Appl Compos Mater2016; 23: 1–17.
26.
Rubino F, Carlone P, Aleksendrić D, et al. Hard and soft computing models of composite curing process looking toward monitoring and control. In: ESAFORM: international ESAFORM conference on material forming. USA: AIP Publishing LLC, 2016, pp. 222–296.
27.
Axenov V, Tarasov I, Shevtsov S, et al. Optimal cure control synthesis for FEM model of aircraft composite part with CAD imported geometry. In: International conference on mechanical, system and control engineering. USA: IEEE, 2017, pp. 6–10.
28.
Struzziero G, Skordos AA. Multi-objective optimisation of the cure of thick components, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2017; 93: 126–136.
29.
KarkanasPIPartridgeIK. Cure modeling and monitoring of epoxy/amine resin systems. I. Cure kinetics modeling. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 77: 1419–1431.
30.
KarkanasPIPartridgeIKAttwoodD. Modelling the cure of a commercial epoxy resin for applications in resin transfer moulding. Polym Int2015; 41: 183–191.
31.
SkordosAAPartridgeIK. Inverse heat transfer for optimization and on-line thermal properties estimation in composites curing. Inverse Prob Sci Eng2004; 12: 157–172.
32.
FarmerJDCovertEE. Thermal conductivity of a thermosetting advanced composite during its cure. J Thermophys Heat Transfer2012; 10: 467–475.
33.
HattaIYamaneTKatayamaSet al.The measurements of thermal conductivity of carbon fibers. J Wide Bandgap Mater2000; 7: 294–305.
34.
AntonucciVGiordanoMInserraimparatoSet al.Analysis of heat transfer in autoclave technology. Polym Compos2001; 22: 613–620.
35.
Hexcel® RTM 6 180℃ epoxy system for resin transfer moulding monocomponent system product data, www.hexcel.com (2016, accessed 5 April 2018).
36.
DebKPratapAAgarwalSet al.A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6: 182–197.
37.
DiasAHFVasconcelosJAD. Multiobjective genetic algorithms applied to solve optimization problems. IEEE Trans Magn2002; 38: 1133–1136.
38.
Laumanns M. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm[J]. Technical Report Gloriastrasse, 2001.
39.
Poles S. MOGA-II an improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Estecotechnical Report, 2003–006.
40.
FormicolaC. Synergistic effects of zinc borate and aluminium trihydroxide on flammability behaviour of aerospace epoxy system. Express Polym Lett2009; 3: 376–384.
41.
OlivierPCavareroM. Comparison between longitudinal tensile characteristics of thin and thick thermoset composite laminates: influence of curing conditions. Comput Struct2000; 76: 125–137.
42.
LiKX. Effect of processing parameters on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. J Macromol Sci Part B2014; 53: 1050–1058.
43.
EspositoLSorrentinoLPentaFet al.Effect of curing overheating on interlaminar shear strength and its modelling in thick FRP laminates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 5–8: 1–8.
44.
SorrentinoLEspositoLBelliniC. A new methodology to evaluate the influence of curing overheating on the mechanical properties of thick FRP laminates. Compos Part B Eng2017; 109: 187–196.
