Mechanical properties of composite materials and their final performance are strongly influenced by the structure and properties of the fiber–matrix interface. A balance between sufficient load transfer and fiber pullout properties helps improve the performance of the composite materials. In this research, we employed sulfuric acid treatment to enhance fiber pullout and debonding through decreasing the fiber–matrix interlock. Atomic force microscope and scanning electron microscopy were employed to investigate the surface morphology of both treated and untreated steel fibers. Our results indicate that surface treatment improves the fiber roughness and therefore hinders brittle failures of the epoxy fiber-reinforced composite materials.
RezwanKChenQZBlakerJJet al.Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials2006; 27: 3413–3431.
AdekunleKDanASkrifvarsM. Biobased composites prepared by compression molding with a novel thermoset resin from soybean oil and a natural-fiber reinforcement. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 116: 1759–1765.
12.
BledzkiAKGassanJ. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibers. Prog Polym Sci1999; 24: 221–274.
13.
Herrera-FrancoPJValadez-GonzálezA. A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng2005; 36: 597–608.
14.
FonsecaRBDe Almeida LNdeMendesGAMet al.Effect of short glass fiber/filler particle proportion on flexural and diametral tensile strength of a novel fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthodont Res2016; 60: 47–53.
15.
MoonCK. Study on the interfacial properties of three-dimensionally arranged glass fiber/epoxy resin model composites. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 2: 1483–1490.
16.
GeorgeJSreekalaMThomasS. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci2001; 41: 1471–1485.
17.
PanYWengGJMeguidSAet al.Interface effects on the viscoelastic characteristics of carbon nanotube polymer matrix composites. Mech Mater2013; 58: 1–11.
18.
AlmeidaRSDamatoCABotelhoECet al.Effect of surface treatment on fatigue behavior of metal/carbon fiber laminates. J Mater Sci2008; 43: 3173–3179.
19.
VargaCMiskolcziNBarthaLet al.Improving the mechanical properties of glass-fibre-reinforced polyester composites by modification of fibre surface. Mater Des2010; 31: 185–193.
20.
ChenHJiaCLiS. Interfacial characterization and thermal conductivity of diamond/Cu composites prepared by two HPHT techniques. J Mater Sci2011; 47: 3367–3375.
21.
Ochoa-PutmanCVaidyaUK. Mechanisms of interfacial adhesion in metal–polymer composites – effect of chemical treatment. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 906–915.
22.
ZaldivarRJKimHISteckelGLet al.Surface preparation for adhesive bonding of polycyanurate-based fiber-reinforced composites using atmospheric plasma treatment. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 120: 921–931.
23.
ChenWTaoZFanLet al.Effect of poly (etherimide) chemical structures on the properties of epoxy/poly (etherimide) blends and their carbon fiber-reinforced composites. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 119: 3162–3169.
24.
JancarJ. Review of the role of the interphase in the control of composite performance on micro- and nano-length scales. J Mater Sci2008; 43: 6747–6757.
25.
GarciaFGSoaresBGLeyvaMEet al.Influence of aliphatic amine epoxy hardener on the adhesive properties of blends of mono-carboxyl- terminated poly (2-ethylhexyl acrylate-co-methyl methacrylate) with epoxy resin. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 117: 2762–2770.
26.
WetherholdRCBösJ. Ductile reinforcements for enhancing fracture resistance in composite materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech2000; 33: 83–91.
27.
BagwellRMWetherholdRC. Debond behavior of copper fibers in thermoset matrices and their effect on fracture toughening. J Adhes Sci Technol2003; 17: 2223–2242.
28.
MaKChenPWangBet al.A study of the effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the interfacial properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 118: 1606–1614.
29.
BagwellRMWetherholdRC. Improvement in fracture toughness of an epoxy/copper composite through the use of various end shaped fibers. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 361: 294–301.
30.
BagwellRMWetherholdRC. Fiber pullout behavior and impact toughness of short shaped copper fibers in thermoset matrices. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36: 683–690.
31.
BagwellRMWetherholdRC. End-shaped copper fibers in an epoxy matrix – predicted versus actual fracture toughening. Theor Appl Fract Mech2005; 43: 181–188.
32.
CallensMGGorbatikhLBertelsEet al.Tensile behaviour of stainless steel fibre/epoxy composites with modified adhesion. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015; 69: 208–218.
33.
WetherholdRCCorjonMDasPK. Multiscale considerations for interface engineering to improve fracture toughness of ductile fiber/thermoset matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2428–2437.
34.
WetherholdRCHarryZ. A rapid chemical method for improving peel strength at Cu-epoxy interfaces. Theor Appl Fract Mech2010; 53: 42–46.
35.
ReddyMGNowshobaPGowdGH. Synthesis and characterization of Hardwickia binata fiber with epoxy. Appl Mech Mater2014; 592–594: 874–878.
GarciaFGLeyvaMEOliveiraMGet al.Influence of chemical structure of hardener on mechanical and adhesive properties of epoxy polymers. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 117: 2213–2219.
38.
WetherholdRCBösJ. Ductile reinforcements for enhancing fracture resistance in composite materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech2000; 33: 83–91.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
