Thermally conductive polymer composites have opened up new possibilities in various applications including solar cells, power generators, electronics, biomedical applications, etc. Polymer matrices have some interesting advantages to offer such as being lightweight, cost effective, corrosion resistant, and many more. However, the thermal conductivity of a polymer matrix is relatively low for some commercial applications. Recent research has focused on enhancing the thermal conductivity of polymer composites through addition of nanofillers such as nanotubes, graphite, carbon fibers, etc. Among these possibilities, carbon nanotubes are considered to be promising candidates due to their unusually high thermal conductivity. This article discusses the properties of nanotube fillers that should be taken into account in order to fabricate a thermally conductive polymer nanocomposite and reviews the status of research in terms of thermal conductivity and nanotubes.
KimJ-YKimMKimHet al.Electrical and optical studies of organic light emitting devices using SWCNTs-polymer nanocomposites. Optic Mater2003; 21: 147–151.
8.
ShiSSilvaSRP. High luminance organic light-emitting diodes with efficient multi-walled carbon nanotube hole injectors. Carbon2012; 50: 4163–4170.
9.
HuangJ-WBaiSJ. Light emitting diodes of fully conjugated heterocyclic aromatic rigid-rod polymer doped with multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology2005; 16: 1406–1406.
10.
GwinnerMCJakubkaFGannottFet al.Enhanced ambipolar charge injection with semiconducting polymer/carbon nanotube thin films for light-emitting transistors. ACS Nano2012; 6: 539–548.
11.
WooHSCzerwRWebsterSet al.Organic light emitting diodes fabricated with single wall carbon nanotubes dispersed in a hole conducting buffer: The role of carbon nanotubes in a hole conducting polymer. Synth Metals2001; 116: 369–372.
12.
WooHSCzerwRWebsterSet al.Hole blocking in carbon nanotube–polymer composite organic light-emitting diodes based on poly(m-phenylene vinylene-co-2, 5-dioctoxy-p-phenylene vinylene). Appl Phys Lett2000; 77: 1393–1395.
13.
FournetPO’BrienDFColemanJNet al.A carbon nanotube composite as an electron transport layer for M3EH-PPV based light-emitting diodes. Synth Metals2001; 121: 1683–1684.
14.
ColemanJNCurranSDaltonABet al.Physical doping of a conjugated polymer with carbon nanotubes. Synth Metals1999; 102: 1174–1175.
15.
AbdulBakiMKTangonanAAdvinculaRCet al.Properties of single-walled carbon nanotube-based poly(phenylene vinylene) electroluminescent nanocomposites. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys2012; 50: 272–279.
16.
BreuerOSundararajU. Big returns from small fibers: A review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Compos2004; 25: 630–645.
17.
DivyaVReddyMLP. Visible-light excited red emitting luminescent nanocomposites derived from Eu3+-phenathrene-based fluorinated [small beta]-diketonate complexes and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem C2013; 1: 160–170.
18.
MooreALShiL. Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics. Mater Today2014; 17: 163–174.
YuARameshPSunXet al.Enhanced thermal conductivity in a hybrid graphite nanoplatelet – Carbon nanotube filler for epoxy composites. Adv Mater2008; 20: 4740–4744.
21.
LiangQMoonKSJiangHet al.Thermal conductivity enhancement of epoxy composites by interfacial covalent bonding for underfill and thermal interfacial materials in Cu/low-K application. IEEE Trans Comp Packag Manuf Technol2012; 2: 1571–1579.
DuFGuthyCKashiwagiTet al.An infiltration method for preparing single-wall nanotube/epoxy composites with improved thermal conductivity. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys2006; 44: 1513–1519.
24.
HongW-TTaiN-H. Investigations on the thermal conductivity of composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Diam Relat Mater2008; 17: 1577–1581.
25.
LiGZhuRYangY. Polymer solar cells. Nat Photon2012; 6: 153–161.
26.
GuoZLeeDLiuYet al.Tuning the thermal conductivity of solar cell polymers through side chain engineering. Phys Chem Chem Phys2014; 16: 7764–7771.
27.
SalimTLeeH-WWongLHet al.Semiconducting carbon nanotubes for improved efficiency and thermal stability of polymer–fullerene solar cells. Adv Funct Mater2016; 26: 51–65.
28.
EslamianMNewtonJ. Spray-on PEDOT:PSS and P3HT:PCBM thin films for polymer solar cells. Coatings2014; 4: 85–97.
29.
KimIJoJYunJ-H. Morphology-controlled high-efficiency small molecule organic solar cells without additive solvent treatment. Nanomaterials2016; 6: 64–64.
30.
AgariYUedaAOmuraYet al.Thermal diffusivity and conductivity of PMMA/PC blends. Polymer1997; 38: 801–807.
31.
XuYRayGAbdel-MagidB. Thermal behavior of single-walled carbon nanotube polymer–matrix composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 114–121.
32.
BoudenneAIbosLCandauY. Thermophysical properties of multiphase polymer syste. In: Handbook of multiphase polymer systems, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, pp. 387–423.
33.
T'JoenCParkYWangQet al.A review on polymer heat exchangers for HVAC&R applications. Int J Refrig2009; 32: 763–779.
34.
NazAKausarASiddiqMet al.Comparative review on structure, properties, fabrication techniques, and relevance of polymer nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotube and graphite fillers. Polym-Plast Technol Eng2016; 55: 171–198.
35.
SwainSKJenaI. Polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites: A novel material. Asian J Chem2010; 22: 1–15.
36.
ThostensonETRenZChouT-W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: A review. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 1899–1912.
37.
RuoffRSQianDLiuWK. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes: Theoretical predictions and experimental measurements. Comptes Rendus Physique2003; 4: 993–1008.
38.
HanZFinaA. Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review. Prog Polym Sci2011; 36: 914–944.
39.
MohamedAODeepakS. Temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology2001; 12: 21–21.
40.
LiQWLiuCHWangXSet al.Measuring the thermal conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes by the Raman shift method. Nanotechnology2009; 20: 145702–145702.
41.
KimSYNohYJYuJ. Thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelets filled composites fabricated by solvent-free processing for the excellent filler dispersion and a theoretical approach for the composites containing the geometrized fillers. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2015; 69: 219–225.
42.
NohYJKimHSKuB-Cet al.Thermal conductivity of polymer composites with geometric characteristics of carbon allotropes. Adv Eng Mater2016; 18: 1127–1132.
43.
ZhangWZhuZYWangFet al.Chirality dependence of the thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology2004; 15: 936–936.
44.
FujiiMZhangXXieHet al.Measuring the thermal conductivity of a single carbon nanotube. Phys Rev Lett2005; 95: 065502–065502.
45.
ZhangGLiB. Thermal conductivity of nanotubes revisited: Effects of chirality, isotope impurity, tube length, and temperature. J Chem Phys2005; 123: 114714–114714.
46.
KimHSBaeHSYuJet al.Thermal conductivity of polymer composites with the geometrical characteristics of graphene nanoplatelets. Scient Rep2016; 6: 26825–26825.
47.
KimSYNohYJYuJ. Improved thermal conductivity of polymeric composites fabricated by solvent-free processing for the enhanced dispersion of nanofillers and a theoretical approach for composites containing multiple heterogeneities and geometrized nanofillers. Compos Sci Technol2014; 101: 79–85.
HongJLeeJHongCKet al.Effect of dispersion state of carbon nanotube on the thermal conductivity of poly(dimethyl siloxane) composites. Curr Appl Phys2010; 10: 359–363.
50.
TianWYangR. Phonon transport and thermal conductivity percolation in random nanoparticle composites. CMES2008; 24: 123–141.
51.
Martin-GallegoMVerdejoRKhayetMet al.Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and graphene in epoxy nanofluids and nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett2011; 6: 610–610.
52.
WangZLMuHTLiangJGet al.Thermal boundary resistance and temperature dependent phonon conduction in CNT array multilayer structure. Int J Therm Sci2013; 74: 53–62.
53.
SinghIVTanakaMEndoM. Effect of interface on the thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Int J Therm Sci2007; 46: 842–847.
54.
NanC-WLiuGLinYet al.Interface effect on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Appl Phys Lett2004; 85: 3549–3551.
55.
RussMRahatekarSSKoziolKet al.Length-dependent electrical and thermal properties of carbon nanotube-loaded epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 81: 42–47.
56.
KapadiaRSLouieBMBandaruPR. The influence of carbon nanotube aspect ratio on thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube–polymer composites. J Heat Transfer2013; 136: 011303–011303.
57.
KimHSJangJ-uYuJet al.Thermal conductivity of polymer composites based on the length of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Part B: Eng2015; 79: 505–512.
58.
ChoiESBrooksJSEatonDLet al.Enhancement of thermal and electrical properties of carbon nanotube polymer composites by magnetic field processing. J Appl Phys2003; 94: 6034–6039.
59.
KimYAHayashiTEndoMet al.Fabrication of aligned carbon nanotube-filled rubber composite. Scripta Mater2006; 54: 31–35.
60.
GonnetPLiangZChoiESet al.Thermal conductivity of magnetically aligned carbon nanotube buckypapers and nanocomposites. Curr Appl Phys2006; 6: 119–122.
61.
JiangQWangXZhuYet al.Mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of aligned carbon nanotube/polyimide composites. Compos Part B: Eng2014; 56: 408–412.
62.
ZhaoHZhouZDongHet al.A facile method to align carbon nanotubes on polymeric membrane substrate. Scient Rep2013; 3: 3480–3480.
63.
MarconnetAMYamamotoNPanzerMAet al.Thermal conduction in aligned carbon nanotube–polymer nanocomposites with high packing density. ACS Nano2011; 5: 4818–4825.
64.
MaCLiuH-YDuXet al.Fracture resistance, thermal and electrical properties of epoxy composites containing aligned carbon nanotubes by low magnetic field. Compos Sci Technol2015; 114: 126–135.
65.
MarshallMWPopa-NitaSShapterJG. Measurement of functionalised carbon nanotube carboxylic acid groups using a simple chemical process. Carbon2006; 44: 1137–1141.
66.
HongJParkDWShimSE. A review on thermal conductivity of polymer composites using carbon-based fillers: Carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers. Carbon Lett2010; 11: 347–356.
67.
MaP-CSiddiquiNAMaromGet al.Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 1345–1367.
ShenoginSXueLOzisikRet al.Role of thermal boundary resistance on the heat flow in carbon-nanotube composites. J Appl Phys2004; 95: 8136–8144.
73.
GulottyRCastellinoMJagdalePet al.Effects of functionalization on thermal properties of single-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotube–polymer nanocomposites. ACS Nano2013; 7: 5114–5121.
74.
JulkapliNMBagheriSSapuanSMMultifunctionalized carbon nanotubes polymer composites: Properties and applications. In: ThakurVKThakurMK (eds). Eco-friendly polymer nanocomposites: Processing and properties, New Delhi: Springer India, 2015, pp. 155–214.
75.
BackesC. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
76.
PonnammaDSungSHHongJSet al.Influence of non-covalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes on the rheological behavior of natural rubber latex nanocomposites. Eur Polym J2014; 53: 147–159.
77.
SunZNicolosiVRickardDet al.Quantitative evaluation of surfactant-stabilized single-walled carbon nanotubes: Dispersion quality and its correlation with zeta potential. J Phys Chem C2008; 112: 10692–10699.
78.
VaismanLWagnerHDMaromG. The role of surfactants in dispersion of carbon nanotubes. Adv Colloid Interf Sci2006; 128–130: 37–46.
KimSWKimTKimYSet al.Surface modifications for the effective dispersion of carbon nanotubes in solvents and polymers. Carbon2012; 50: 3–33.
81.
De FilpoGNicolettaFPCilibertiLet al.Non-covalent functionalisation of single wall carbon nanotubes for efficient dye-sensitised solar cells. J Power Sources2015; 274: 274–279.
