There is an emerging interest in the aerospace industry to manufacture components with intricate geometries using discontinuous-fibre carbon/polyether-ether-ketone moulding systems (obtained by cutting unidirectional tape into strands). Great formability and high modulus can be achieved with this type of composites, but the high variability of measured properties can have a detrimental effect on the design allowables. When it comes to prediction of mechanical properties, it is important to capture the average strength and modulus as well as their statistical variability. This article proposes a stochastic finite element technique that uses the concept of randomly oriented strands to model variability, and the application of Hashin’s failure criteria and fracture energies to estimate strength. Overall, the model matches the trends observed during experiments and shows that strength of randomly oriented strand composites is significantly lower than that of continuous-fibre laminates due to the ‘weakest-link’ principle.
Eguémann N, Giger L, Roux M, et al. Compression moulding of complex parts for the aerospace with discontinuous novel and recycled thermoplastic composite materials. In: The 19th international conference on composite materials, Montreal, Canada, 2013.
4.
Selezneva M, Picher-Martel G-P, Landry B, et al. Compression moulding of discontinuous-fibre carbon/PEEK composites: study of mechanical properties. In: SAMPE Baltimore, Maryland, US, 2012.
5.
SeleznevaMLessardL. Characterization of mechanical properties of randomly oriented strand thermoplastic composites. J Compos Mater2015; 0: 1–19.
6.
Picher-Martel G-P and Hubert P. Squeeze flow behaviour of Carbon/PEEK Randomly-Oriented Strands under transverse compaction. In: American society for composites 27th annual technical conference/The 15th US-Japan conference on composite materials, Arlington, Texas, 2012.
7.
Picher-MartelG-PLevyAHubertP. Compression molding of carbon/polyether ether ketone composites: squeeze flow behavior of unidirectional and randomly oriented strands. Polym Compos2015. doi: 10.1002/pc.23753.
8.
Landry B and Hubert P. Processing effect on the damage tolerance of randomly-oriented strands thermoplastic composites. In: The 19th international conference on composite materials, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2013.
9.
Han JH, Alexander WB, Torres F, et al. Effect of fabric reinforcement on failure response of discontinuous long fiber composite bolted joints. In: SAMPE, Long Beach, CA, 2011.
RouxMEguemannNDransfeldC. Thermoplastic carbon fibre-reinforced polymer recycling with electrodynamical fragmentation: From cradle to cradle. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2015, pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1177/0892705715599431.
14.
Matsuo T, Takayama K, Takahashi J, et al. Design and manufacturing of anisotropic hollow beam using thermoplastic composites. In: The 19th international conference on composite materials, Montreal, Canada, 2013.
15.
Sato Y, Takahashi J, Matsuo T, et al. Elastic modulus estimation of chopped carbon fiber taper reinforced thermoplastics using the monte carlo simulation. In: The 19th international conference on composite materials, Montreal, Canada, 2013.
16.
FeraboliPClevelandTSticklerP. Stochastic laminate analogy for simulating the variability in modulus of discontinuous composite materials. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 557–570.
17.
DaiCSteinerPR. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part 2. Modelling and simulation of randomly-formed flake layer network. Wood Sci Technol1994; 28: 135–146.
18.
PainterGBudmanHPritzkerM. Prediction of oriented strand board properties from mat formation and compression operating conditions. Part 1. Horizontal density distribution and vertical density profile. Wood Sci Technol2005; 40: 139–158.
19.
LuCSteinerPRLamF. Simulation study of wood-flake composite mat structures. Forest Prod J1998; 48: 89–93.
20.
NaderiM. Stochastic analysis of inter- and intra-laminar damage in notched PEEK laminates. eXPRESS Polym Lett2013; 7: 383–395.
21.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Damage initiation for fiber-reinforced composites. In: Abaqus/standard v 610 abaqus analysis user’s manual.
22.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Damage evolution and element removal for fiber-reinforced composites. In: Abaqus/standard v 610 abaqus analysis user’s manual.
23.
LapczykIHurtadoJA. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 2333–2341.
24.
BartonDCSodenPD. Stiffness and strength properties of asymmetric glass reinforced polyester laminates. Composites1982; 13: 180–201.
25.
Krenchel H. Fibre reinforcement. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 1964.
26.
PimentaSRobinsonP. An analytical shear-lag model for composites with ‘brick-and-mortar’ architecture considering non-linear matrix response and failure. Compos Sci Technol2014; 104: 111–124.
27.
CzélGPimentaSWisnomMR. Demonstration of pseudo-ductility in unidirectional discontinuous carbon fibre/epoxy prepreg composites. Compos Sci Technol2015; 106: 110–119.
