The properties of steel substrates coated with soft polymers were characterized, in order to assess their connection to ballistic properties. An impact-induced viscoelastic phase change of the polymer effects large energy dissipation, while also spreading the force over a wider area, which reduces the impact pressure. Both effects enhance the performance, as directly measured and seen from strain measurements on the substrate taken during ballistic tests. The contribution of the front-surface polymer to impact performance is increased for harder substrates, indicating a coupling of the layers related to impedance mismatching. Since this effect is very local, the phenomenon can be exploited by surface-hardening of the steel.
RolandCMFragiadakisDGamacheRM. Factors influencing the ballistic impact resistance of elastomer-coated metal substrates. Philos Mag2013; 93: 468–477.
6.
HisleyDMGurganusJCDrysdaleAW. Experimental methodology using digital image correlation to assess ballistic helmet blunt trauma. J Appl Mech2011; 78: 051022–051022.
7.
Gooch WA and Burking MS. Analysis of threat projectiles for protection of light tactical vehicles. In: Proceedings of add-on armor conference, Sterling Heights, MI, USA, 14–15 July 2004; reprinted by Army Research Lab, ARL-RP-89.
OyenMLCookRF. A practical guide for analysis of nanoindentation data. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2009; 2: 396–407.
10.
WalleySM. Historical review of high strain rate and shock properties of ceramics relevant to their application in armour. Adv Appl Ceram2009; 109: 446–466.
11.
Gooch WA. Overview of the development of ceramic armor technology: Past, present and the future. In: 35th international conference and exposition on advanced ceramics and composites, Daytona Beach, Fl, USA, 23–28 January 2011.
GrujicicMYavariRSnipesJS. Molecular-level computational investigation of shock-wave mitigation capability of polyurea. J Mater Sci2012; 47: 8197–8215.
14.
AmirkhiziAVIsaacsJMcGeeJ. An experimentally-based viscoelastic constitutive model for polyurea, including pressure and temperature effects. Philos Mag2006; 86: 5847–5866.
15.
El SayedTMockWMotaA. Computational assessment of ballistic impact on a high strength structural steel/polyurea composite plate. Comput Mech2009; 43: 525–534.
16.
ChenCLinzellDGAlpmanE. Effectiveness of advanced coating system mitigating blast effect for steel components. WIT Trans Built Environ2008; 98: 85–94.
17.
AminiMRAmirkhiziAVNemat-NasserS. Numerical modeling of response of monolithic and bilayer plates to impulsive loads. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 90–102.
18.
GrujicicMPanduranganBHeT. Computational investigation of impact energy absorption capability of polyurea coatings via deformation-induced glass transition. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 7741–7751.
19.
ChakkarapaniVRavi-ChandarKLiechtiKM. Characterization of multiaxial constitutive properties of rubbery polymers. J Eng Mater Technol2006; 128: 489–494.
20.
RolandCMCasaliniR. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the viscoelastic response of polyurea. Polymer2007; 48: 5747–5752.
21.
ChoiTFragiadakisDRolandCM. Microstructure and segmental dynamics of polyurea under uniaxial deformation. Macromolecules2012; 45: 3581–3589.
22.
PathakJATwiggJNNugentKE. Structure evolution in a polyurea segmented block copolymer because of mechanical deformation. Macromolecules2008; 41: 7543–7548.
23.
RolandCMTwiggJNVuY. High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea. Polymer2007; 48: 574–578.
24.
SarvaSSDeschanelSBoyceMC. Stress-strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer2007; 48: 2213–2213.
25.
AlbrechtABLiechtiKMRavi-ChandarK. Characterization of the transient response of polyurea. Exp Mech2013; 53: 113–122.
26.
HolzworthKJiaZAmirkhiziSV. Effect of isocyanate content on thermal and mechanical properties of polyurea. Polymer2013; 54: 3079–3085.
27.
XueZHutchinsonJW. Neck development in metal/elastomer bilayers under dynamic stretchings. Int J Solids Struct2008; 45: 3769–3778.
28.
XueZHutchinsonJW. Neck retardation and enhanced energy absorption in metal–elastomer bilayers. Mech Mater2007; 39: 473–487.
29.
GrujicicMPanduranganBKingAE. Multi-length scale modeling and analysis of microstructure evolution and mechanical properties in polyurea. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 1767–1779.
30.
ArmanBReddyASAryaG. Viscoelastic properties and shock response of coarse-grained models of multiblock versus diblock copolymers: Insights into dissipative properties of polyurea. Macromolecules2012; 45: 3247–3255.
31.
GrujicicMYavariRSnipesJS. Experimental and computational study of the shearing resistance of polyurea at high pressures and high strain rates. J Mater Eng Perf2014; 24: 778–798.
32.
XueLMockWBelytschkoT. Penetration of DH-36 steel plates with and without polyurea coating. Mech Mater2010; 42: 981–1003.
33.
AminiMRIsaacsJBNemat-NasserS. Experimental investigation of response of monolithic and bilayer plates to impulsive loads. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 82–89.
