This paper studies failure of birch pulp–polylactic acid composites. Stiffness and strength are calculated using the theory of short fibre composites and the results are compared to experimental data. The results differed from the experimental values by 0–6%. With less aligned fibres the short fibre theory is not feasible. The performance of the 40 wt% birch pulp – polylactic acid composite is predicted with X-ray microtomography based finite element modelling, and the results are compared with experiments. Stiffness results differed from experiments by 1–17% . By adding into the models a third material phase representing the interface between the fibres and the matrix, the stress–strain curve of the composite was obtained with good accuracy. The work presents finite element modelling methodology of wood plastic composites and the critical further steps needed in order to assess the stress–strain behaviour, strength and stiffness. Tools for comparing different wood plastic composite microstructures are also presented.
MadsenBGamstedtK. Wood versus plant fibres: similarities and differences in composite applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng2013.; Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/564346.
DittenberDBGanga RaoHVS. critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A2012; 43: 1419–1429.
5.
Almgren KM. Wood-fibre composites: stress transfer and hygroexpansion. PhD Thesis, KTH Fibre and Polymer Technology, School of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
6.
PeltolaHPääkkönenEJetsuP. Wood based PLA and PP composites: effect of fibre type and matrix polymer on fibre morphology, dispersion and composite properties. Compos Part A2014; 61: 13–22.
Joffre T. Structure and mechanical behaviour of wood-fibre composites. Dissertation, Uppsala University, 2014.
9.
Schwarzkopf M, Muszynski L and Nairn JA. Micromechanics of the internal bond in wood plastic composites: integrating measurement and modelling. In: Eleventh world Congress on Computational Mechanics, WCCM XI, 20–25 July 2014, Barcelona, Spain. http://www.wccm-eccm-ecfd2014.org/admin/files/fileabstract/a1780.pdf.
10.
Schwarzkopf MJ. Characterization of load transfer in wood-based composites. Dissertation (submitted), Oregon State University, 2014.
11.
MadsenBJoffeRPeltolaH. Short cellulosic fibre/starch acetate composites – micromechanical modelling of Young’s modulus. J Compos Mater2011; 45: 2119–2131.
12.
Eitzenberger J. Mechanics of microdamage development and stiffness degradation in fibre composites. Licenthiate Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Dept of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Division of Polymer Engineering, 2007.
13.
Lu Y. Mechanical properties of random discontinuous fibre composites manufactured from wetlay process. Master of Science Thesis, Virginia, Polytechnic Institute and State University, Engineering Mechanics, 2002.
14.
CoxHL. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br J Appl Phys1952; 3: 72–79.
15.
NielsonLE. Mechanical properties of polymer and composites1974; Vol. 2, New York: Marcel Dekker.
16.
LoewensteinKL. Composite materials, New York: Holliday and Elsevier, 1966.
17.
BlumentrittBFVuBTCooperSL. Mechanical properties of discontinuous fibre reinforced thermoplastics. II. Random-in-plane fibre orientation. Polym Eng Sci1975; 15: 428–436.
ManeraM. Elastic properties of randomly oriented short fibre-glass composites. J Compos Mater1977; 11: 235–247.
20.
PanN. The elastic constants of randomly oriented fibre composite: a new approach to prediction. Sci Eng Compos Mater1996; 5: 63–72.
21.
CurtisPTBaderMGBaileyJE. The stiffness and strength of a polyamide thermoplastic reinforced with glass and carbon fibres. J Mater Sci1978; 13: 377–390.
22.
ChenPE. Strength properties of discontinuous fibre composites. Polym Eng Sci1971; 11: 51–56.
23.
KellyATysonWR. Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: Copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids1965; 13: 329–336.
24.
FuS-YLaukeB. Effects of fibre length and fibre orientation distributions on the tensile strength of short-fibre-reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 1179–1190.
25.
Neagu, http://www.forestprod.org/woodfibre05neagu.pdf, 15.12.2009. Not found on internet any more. See also Neagu RC, Gamstedt EK and Berthold F. Stiffness contribution of various wood fibers to composite materials. J Compos Mater2006; 40: 663–699.
26.
Rogers J, Zhang C and Simonsen J. The relationship of interfacial shear strength to composite properties. In: Eighth international conference on woodfibre-plastic composites (and other natural fibres), Madison, WI: Forest Products Society, 2005.
27.
RobertsRJRoweRCYorkP. The Poisson ratio of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm1994; 105: 177–180.
28.
HolmbergKLaukkanenAGhabchiA. Computational modeling based wear resistance analysis of thick composite coatings. Tribol Int2014; 72: 13–30.
29.
HolmbergKLaukkanenATurunenE. Wear resistance optimization of composite coatings by computational microstructural modeling. Surf Coat Technol2014; 247: 1–13.
MeilleSGarbocziEJ. Linear elastic properties of 2D and 3D models of porous materials made from elongated objects. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2001; 9: 371–390.
32.
BegMDHPickeringKL. Mechanical performance of Kraft fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: influence of fibre length, fibre beating and hygrothermal ageing. Compos Part A2008; 39: 1748–1755.
33.
MalkapuramRKumarVNegiYS. Recent development in natural fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2010; 29: 2343–2355.
