A single-fiber test specimen to measure the tensile strength of a glass fiber–epoxy interface is introduced. The fiber is oriented perpendicular to the loading axis through the thickness of the specimen. Tensile testing was conducted in situ in a scanning electron microscope. The stress state at the fiber–matrix interface was determined using 3D finite element stress analysis (FEA). The effects of mechanical loading and cure shrinkage of the matrix material are included in the FEA. It was observed that debond initiation occurs on the loading axis where the tensile stress acting on the fiber–matrix interface is maximum. Based on the measured load at onset of debonding and finite element stress analysis, the tensile strength of the fiber–matrix interface was about 36.6 MPa.
DrzalLTHerrera-FrancoPJHoH. Fiber–matrix interface tests. In: Kelly A and Zweben C (eds) Comprehensive composite materials, Oxford: Pergamon, 2000, pp. 71–111.
2.
ASTM Standard D2344 / D2344M. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2006.
3.
MadhukarMSDrzalLT. Fiber-matrix adhesion and its effect on composite mechanical properties: I. Inplane and interlaminar shear behavior of graphite/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 932–957.
4.
MadhukarMSDrzalLT. Fiber-matrix adhesion and its effect on composite mechanical properties: II. Longitudinal (0) and transverse (90) tensile and flexure behavior of graphite/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 958–991.
5.
PiggottMR. Why interface testing by single-fiber methods can be misleading. Compos Sci Tech1997; 57: 965–974.
ZhangHEricsonMLVarnaJ. Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites: 1 experimental observations. Compos A1997; 28: 309–315.
8.
ZhangHEricsonMLVarnaJ. Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites: 2 Modeling. Compos A1997; 28: 317–326.
9.
FoliasES. On the prediction of failure at a fiber/matrix interface in a composite subjected to a transverse tensile load. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 869–886.
10.
GundelDBMajumdarBSMiracleDB. Evaluation of the transverse response of the fiber-reinforced composites using a cross-shaped sample geometry. Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia1995; 33: 2057–2065.
11.
OgiharaSSakamotoYKoyanagiJ. Evaluation of interfacial tensile strength in glass fiber/epoxy resin interface using the cruciform specimen method. J Solid Mech Mater Eng2009; 3: 1071–1080.
12.
TandonGPKimRYBechelVT. Fiber-matrix interfacial failure characterization using a cruciform-shaped specimen. J Compos Mater2002; 36: 2667–2691.
13.
TandonGPKimRYWarrierSG. Influence of free edge and corner singularities on interfacial normal strength: application in model unidirectional composites. Compos Part B1998; 30: 115–134.
14.
DanielIMIshaiO. Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
15.
“Buehler Epoxicure Resin Material Saftey Data Sheet.” Lake Bluff, IL: Buehler, Inc.
16.
ASTM D638-03 2003. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
17.
RamirezFACarlssonLAAchaBA. Evaluation of water degradation of vinylester and epoxy matrix composites by single fiber and composite tests. J Mater Sci2008; 43: 5230–5242.
18.
ANSYS version 13, 2010, ANSYS Inc., Cecil Township, CA.
19.
FarooqMUCarlssonLAAchaBA. Stress analysis of the Outwater-Murphy fiber/matrix debond specimen. J Compos Mater2012; 47: 1399–1406.
20.
KavatiDR. Airy stress function for two dimensional inclusion, Master Thesis: The University of Texas at Arlington, 2005.
21.
McClintock FA and Irwin GR. Plasticity aspects of fracture mechanics, in Fracture toughness testing and its applications, ASTM, STP 381, 1965, pp.84–113.
