Recent emphasis on the proper utilization of the available natural resources as well as the compatibility between industrial sustainability and the environment have recognized the natural fiber reinforced polymer composites as a valuable type of materials. The final features of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites are strongly influenced by the characteristics of their constituents. Several factors affect implementing natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications, which make it a matter of multi-criteria decision making problem. In this work, a decision-making model is introduced to evaluate and select the most appropriate non-woven natural reinforcement fiber/polypropylene-based composites for interior parts in the automotive industry considering various evaluation criteria simultaneously. The analytical hierarchy process was utilized to assess 15 potential alternatives of different natural fiber/polypropylene composites. The evaluation process considered simultaneous six evaluation criteria, namely tensile strength, tensile modulus, flexural strength, flexural modulus, impact strength and the maximum water absorption of the composites. Such approach is implemented here for the first time to enhance the selection process of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites for automotive application and to expand the future sustainable design possibilities in this sector. Both impact and flexural strengths were found to have the major priority in the evaluation process. The treated flax/polypropylene composite with 30 wt% fiber loading alternative was found to be the best with regard to the overall evaluation criteria. Date palm fiber/polypropylene composites were found to be potential considering the whole desired evaluation criteria.
AL-OqlaFMSapuanSM. Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in industrial applications: feasibility of date palm fibers for sustainable automotive industry. J Cleaner Prod2014; 66: 347–354.
2.
DweiriFAl-OqlaFM. Material selection using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Comput Appl Technol2006; 26: 182–189.
3.
Al-OqlaFMOmarAA. An expert-based model for selecting the most suitable substrate material type for antenna circuits. Int J Electron2014. DOI: 10.1080/00207217.2014.961041.
4.
JahanAIsmailMYMustaphaF. Material selection based on ordinal data. Mater Des2010; 31: 3180–3187.
5.
ThakurVK. Green composites from natural resources, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013.
6.
SapuanSMPuaF-lEl-ShekeilYA. Mechanical properties of soil buried kenaf fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Mater Des2013; 50: 467–470.
7.
AL-OqlaFMSapuanSMIshakMR. Combined multi-criteria evaluation stage technique as an agro waste evaluation indicator for polymeric composites: date palm fibers as a case study. BioResources2014; 9: 4608–4621.
8.
AL-OqlaFMAlothmanOYJawaidM. Processing and properties of date palm fibers and its composites. Biomass Bioenergy, Cham: Springer, 2014, pp. 1–25.
9.
MirAZitouneRCollombetF. Study of mechanical and thermomechanical properties of jute/epoxy composite laminate. J Reinf Plast Compos2010; 29: 1669–1680.
10.
ThakurVK. Lignocellulosic polymer composites: processing, characterization, and properties, Salem, Tamil Nadu: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
11.
ThakurVKThakurMK. Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohydr Polym2014; 109: 102–117.
12.
ThakurVKThakurMKGuptaRK. Rapid synthesis of graft copolymers from natural cellulose fibers. Carbohydr Polym2013; 98: 820–828.
13.
AlvesCFerrãoPSilvaA. Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J Cleaner Prod2010; 18: 313–827.
14.
ThakurVKThakurMKGuptaRK. Review: raw natural fiber–based polymer composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact2014; 19: 256–271.
15.
KaliaSAvérousLNjugunaJ. Natural fibers, bio-and nanocomposites. Int J Polym Sci2011, pp. 1–35.
16.
ThakurVKThakurMK. Recent advances in graft copolymerization and applications of chitosan: a review. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2014; 2: 2637–2652.
17.
ThakurVKSinghaA. Mechanical and water absorption properties of natural fibers/polymer biocomposites. Polym-Plast TechnolEng2010; 49: 694–700.
18.
AL-OqlaFMSapuanSMIshakMR. A novel evaluation tool for enhancing the selection of natural fibers for polymeric composites based on fiber moisture content criterion. BioResources2015; 10: 299–312.
19.
ThakurVSinghaAThakurM. Biopolymers based green composites: Mechanical, thermal and physico-chemical characterization. J Polym Environ2012; 20: 412–421.
20.
ThakurVSinghaAThakurM. Natural cellulosic polymers as potential reinforcement in composites: physicochemical and mechanical studies. Adv Polym Tech2013; 32: E427–E35.
21.
ThakurVKThakurMKGuptaRK. Graft copolymers from cellulose: synthesis, characterization and evaluation. Carbohydr Polym2013; 97: 18–25.
22.
SudhakaraPJagadeeshDWangY. Fabrication of (Borassus) fruit lignocellulose fiber/PP composites and comparison with jute, sisal and coir fibers. Carbohydr Polym2013; 98: 1002–1010.
23.
KahramanRAbbasiSAbu-SharkhB. Influence of epolene G-3003 as a coupling agent on the mechanical behavior of palm fiber-polypropylene composites. Int J Polym Mater2005; 54: 483–503.
24.
Abu-SharkhBHamidH. Degradation study of date palm fibre/polypropylene composites in natural and artificial weathering: mechanical and thermal analysis. Polym Degrad Stab2004; 85: 967–973.
25.
BendahouAKaddamiHSautereauH. Short palm tree fibers polyolefin composites: effect of filler content and coupling agent on physical properties. Macromol Mater Eng2008; 293: 140–148.
26.
MahmoudiNHebbarN. Study of mechanical properties of a composite-based plant fibre of the palm and thermoplastic matrices (PP). J Compos Mater2014; 48: 291–299.
27.
KastenssonÅ. Developing lightweight concepts in the automotive industry: taking on the environmental challenge with the SåNätt project. J Cleaner Prod2014; 66: 337–346.
28.
KaliaSKaithBKaurI. Cellulose fibers: bio-and nano-polymer composites: green chemistry and technology, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
29.
DittenberDBGangaRaoHV. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2011.
30.
AL-OqlaFMSapuanSMIshakMR. Decision making model for optimal reinforcement condition of natural fiber composites. Fibers Polym2015; 16: 153–163.
31.
Abdal-hayASuardanaNPGJungDY. Effect of diameters and alkali treatment on the tensile properties of date palm fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2012; 13: 1199–1206.
32.
ArbelaizACanteroGFernandezB. Flax fiber surface modifications: effects on fiber physico mechanical and flax/polypropylene interface properties. Polym Compos2005; 26: 324–332.
33.
AzwaZYousifBManaloA. A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des2013; 47: 424–442.
34.
BajpaiPKSinghIMadaanJ. Comparative studies of mechanical and morphological properties of polylactic acid and polypropylene based natural fiber composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 1712–1724.
35.
ThakurVKVennerbergDKesslerMR. Green aqueous surface modification of polypropylene for novel polymer nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interf2014; 6: 9349–9356.
36.
SapuanSMKhoJYZainudinES. Materials selection for natural fiber reinforced polymer composites using analytical hierarchy process. Ind J Eng Mat Sci2011; 18: 255–267.
37.
CheungH-yHoM-pLauK-t. Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Compos Part B: Eng2009; 40: 655–663.
38.
MajumdarA. Selection of raw materials in textile spinning industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. Fibers Polym2010; 11: 121–127.
39.
MajumdarASarkarBMajumdarPK. Application of analytic hierarchy process for the selection of cotton fibers. Fibers Polym2004; 5: 297–302.
40.
LuzSMCaldeira-PiresAFerraoP. Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components. Resour Conserv Recycl2010; 54: 1135–1144.
41.
RaoRPatelB. A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Mater Des2010; 31: 4738–4747.
42.
MansorMRSapuanSMZainudinES. Hybrid natural and glass fibers reinforced polymer composites material selection using analytical hierarchy process for automotive brake lever design. Mater Des2013; 51: 484–492.
43.
RaoRV. Decision making in the manufacturing environment: using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods, London, UK: Springer, 2013.
44.
SaatyTLVargasLG. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, New York: Springer, 2012.
45.
ZhüK. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: fallacy of the popular methods. Eur J Oper Res2014; 236: 209–217.
46.
RathodMKKanzariaHV. A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment. Mater Des2011; 32: 3578–3585.
47.
SaatyTLTranLT. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Comput Modell2007; 46: 962–975.
48.
ScottJAHoWDeyPK. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems. Energy2012; 42: 146–156.
49.
OuammiAGhigliottiVRobbaM. A decision support system for the optimal exploitation of wind energy on regional scale. Renew Energ2012; 37: 299–309.
50.
WongJKLiH. Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Build Environ2008; 43: 108–125.
51.
SherifAEl-ZafaranyAArafaR. External perforated window Solar Screens: the effect of screen depth and perforation ratio on energy performance in extreme desert environments. EnergBuildings2012; 52: 1–10.
52.
Al-WidyanMIAl-OqlaFM. Selecting the most appropriate corrective actions for energy saving in existing buildings A/C in hot arid regions. Build Simul2014; 7: 537–545.
53.
Al-WidyanMIAl-OqlaFM. Utilization of supplementary energy sources for cooling in hot arid regions via decision-making model. Int J Eng Res Appl2011; 1: 1610–1622.
54.
Al-OqlaFMOmarAA. A decision-making model for selecting the GSM mobile phone antenna in the design phase to increase over all performance. Prog Electromagn Res C Pier C2012; 25: 249–269.
55.
DalalahDAl-OqlaFHayajnehM. Application of the analytic Hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of cranes. Jordan J Mech Indust Eng JJMIE2010; 4: 567–578.
56.
SubramoniamRHuisinghDChinnamRB. Remanufacturing decision-making framework (RDMF): research validation using the analytical hierarchical process. J Cleaner Prod2013; 40: 212–220.
57.
AL-Oqla FM and Hayajneh MT. A design decision-making support model for selecting suitable product color to increase probability. In: Design challenge conference: managing creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Amman, Jordan, May 4, 2007. pp. 18–24.
58.
MirSSNafsinNHasanM. Improvement of physico-mechanical properties of coir-polypropylene biocomposites by fiber chemical treatment. Mater Des2013; 52: 251–257.
59.
HaqueMMHasanMIslamMS. Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated palm and coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Bioresour Technol2009; 100: 4903–4906.
60.
AsadzadehM. Bending properties of date palm fiber and jute fiber reinforced Polymeric composite. Int J Adv Des Manuf Technol2013; 5: 59–63.
61.
RahmanMRHuqueMMIslamMN. Improvement of physico-mechanical properties of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene composites by post-treatment. Compos Part A: Appl SciManuf2008; 39: 1739–1747.
62.
AsumaniOReidRPaskaramoorthyR. The effects of alkali–silane treatment on the tensile and flexural properties of short fibre non-woven kenaf reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43: 1431–1440.
63.
LawTIshakZ. Water absorption and dimensional stability of short kenaf fiber‐filled polypropylene composites treated with maleated polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 120: 563–572.
64.
ZampaloniMPourboghratFYankovichS. Kenaf natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: a discussion on manufacturing problems and solutions. Composi Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1569–1580.
65.
JosephPRabelloMSMattosoL. Environmental effects on the degradation behaviour of sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1357–1372.
66.
Rowell RM, Sanadi AR, Caulfield DF, Jacobson RE. Utilization of natural fibers in plastic composites: problems and opportunities. In: LEÃO AL, CARVALHO FX and FROLLINI E (eds). Lignocellulosic-Plastic Composites. São Paulo: USP/UNESP, 1997. pp. 21–51.
