Carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites (CFEC) were fabricated infusing 0–0.40 wt% XD-grade carbon nanotube (XD-CNT) using the compression molding process under 16 kips. XD-CNTs were infused into Epon 862 resin using a mechanical stirrer followed by a high intensity ultrasonic liquid processor. The mixture was then placed in a three-roll milling processor for three successive cycles at 140 rpm. Epikure W curing agent was added to the modified resin and mixed using a high-speed mechanical stirrer. Flexural and tensile properties obtained from the flexural and tensile tests were higher in all nanophased composites compared to those of the conventional one. However, samples with 0.3 wt% CNT loading demonstrated the maximum improvement by 27% and 14% in flexural strength and modulus and 19% and 10% in tensile strength and modulus, respectively. Fracture morphology studied by both scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy revealed better interfacial bonding in the CNT-loaded CFEC.
FarhanaPZhouYRangariV. Testing and evaluation on the thermal and mechanical properties of carbon nano fiber reinforced SC-15 epoxy. Mater Sci Eng: A2005; 405: 246–253.
2.
MahfuzHAdnanARangariVK. Carbon nanoparticles/whiskers reinforced composites and their tensile response. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 519–527.
3.
ZhouYFarhanaPLewisL. Experimental study on the thermal and mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy. Mater Sci Eng: A2007; 452: 657–664.
4.
KimMParkYBOkoliO. Processing, characterization, and modeling of carbon nanotubes reinforced multiscale composites. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 335–342.
5.
HassanMZainuddinSParkerMR. Reinforcement of SC-15 epoxy with CNT/CNF under high magnetic field: an investigation of mechanical and thermal response. J Mater Sci2009; 44: 1113–1120.
6.
LiaoYHOlivierMTLiangZY. Investigation of the dispersion process of SWNTs/SC-15 epoxy resin nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng: A2004; 385: 175–181.
ZhouYXWuPXChengZY. Improvement in electrical, thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy by filling carbon nanotube. eXPRESS Polym Lett2008; 2: 40–48.
9.
YapingZAiboZQuinghuaC. Functionalized effect on carbon nanotube/epoxy nano-composites. Mater Sci Eng: A2006; 145: 435–436.
10.
XieXMaiYWZhouXP. Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: a review. Mater Sci Eng2005; 49: 89–112.
11.
SahooNGRanaSChoJW. Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci2010; 35: 837–867.
12.
MaPCMoSYTangBZ. Dispersion, interfacial interaction and reagglomeration of functionalized carbon nanotubes in epoxy composites. Carbon2010; 48: 1824–1834.
13.
MallickPK. Fiber reinforced composites, New York: CRC Press, 2007.
14.
RahmanMMZainuddinSHosurMV. Improvements in mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of E-glass/epoxy composites using amino functionalized MWCNTs. Compos Struct2012; 94: 2397–2406.
TaoKYangSGrunlanJC. Effects of carbon nanotube fillers on the curing processes of epoxy resin–based composites. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 102: 5248–5254.
17.
OkoroCUHossainMKHosurMV. Mechanical characterization of XD-grade carbon nanotube/epon 862 processed by dual phase dispersion technique. J Eng Mater Technol2011; 133: 131–134.
18.
DavisDCWilkersonJWZhuJ. Improvements in mechanical properties of a carbon fiber epoxy composite using nanotube science and technology. Compos Struct2010; 92: 2653–2662.
19.
JianfengSWeishiHLipingW. The reinforcement role of different amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes in epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 3041–3050.
20.
GojnyFHWichmannMFiedlerB. Influence of different carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites – a comparative study. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 2300–2313.
21.
ASTM Standard D790-10. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. DOI: 10.1520/D0790-02. Available at: www.astm.org.
22.
ASTM Standard D638-10. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. DOI: 10.1520/D0638-10. Available at: www.astm.org.
23.
ZhangAYLiDHZhangDX. Qualitative separation of the effect of viods o the static mechanical properties of hygrothermally conditioned carbon/epoxy composites. eXPRESS Polym Lett2011; 5: 708–716.
24.
SulIHYounJRSongYS. Quantitative dispersion evaluation of carbon nanotubes using a new analysis protocol. Carbon2011; 49: 1473–1478.
25.
FuXWangJDingJ. Quantitative evaluation of carbon nanotube dispersion through scanning electron microscopy images. Compos Sci Technol2013; 87: 170–173.
26.
KhareHSBurrisDL. A quantitative method for measuring nanocomposite dispersion. Polymer2010; 51: 719–729.
GaoYLiZLinZ. Automated dispersion and orientation analysis for carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites. Nanotechnology2012; 23: 435706–435706.
29.
KhanSUKimJK. Impact and delamination failure of multiscale carbon nanotube-fiber reinforced polymer composites: a review. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2011; 12: 115–133.
30.
HossainMKHossainMEHosurMV. Flexural and compression response of woven E-Glass/polyester–CNF nanophased composites. J Compos Part A2011; 42: 1774–1782.
31.
SongYSYounJR. Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon2005; 43: 1378–1385.
32.
GojnyFHMalteHGWichmannM. Influence of nano-modification on the mechanical and electrical properties of conventional fibre-reinforced composites. Compos Part A2005; 36: 1525–1535.
33.
LeeJHRheeKYParkSJ. Silane Modification of carbon nanotubes and its effects on the material properties of carbon/CNT/epoxy three-phase composites. Compos Part A2011; 42: 478–483.
