In-plane shear behaviour of composite sandwich panel incorporated with shear keys methodology at different orientations: finite element study

Abstract

The effect of introducing semi-circular shear keys in at the skin-core interface of the composite sandwich panels is illustrated numerically in the current study using ABAQUS software. Particularly, the effect of the shear keys orientation (shear grid), namely ±15°, ±30°, ±45°, ±60° and 90/0°, on the shear response of the sandwich panel is introduced. Composite sandwich panels consisting of polyurethane foam core sandwiched between stiff glass fibre reinforced polymer skins were used, while chopped strand glass fibre impregnated with epoxy resin was utilized for the keys. The nonlinear finite element model was built to capture the shear response and the damage mode of the sandwich panel with the shear grid. The finite element model nominated the model with ±60° grid orientation to be the most sustainable one among the other investigated models. In comparison to the model with shear keys in one direction (uni-axial model), the model with shear grid showed a significant reduction in the shear strength.

Keywords

Composite sandwich panels shear key shear behaviour polyurethane foam glass fiber reinforced polymer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zenkert

. An introduction to sandwich constructions, London: EMAS, 1995.

Torre

Kenny

. Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation. Compos Struct 2000; 50: 257–267.

Mines

Worrall

Gibson

. Low velocity perforation behaviour of polymer composite sandwich panels. Int J Impact Engng 1998; 21: 855–879.

Kootsookos

Burchill

. The effect of the degree of cure on the corrosion resistance of vinyl ester/glass fibre composites. Compos A 2004; 35: 501–508.

Allard

Atalla

. Propagation of sound in porous media: Modelling of sound absorbing materials, 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009.

Sahraoui

Mariez

Etchessahar

. Mechanical testing of polymeric foams at low frequency. Polym Test 2001; 20: 93–96.

Kalaprasad

Pradeep

George

. Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity analyses of low-density polyethylene composites reinforced with sisal, glass and intimately mixed sisal/glass fibres. Compos Sci Technol 2000; 60: 2967–2977.

Anderson Melvin

. Optimum proportions of truss core and webcore sandwich plates loaded in compression. NASA TN D-98 1959.

Steeves

Fleck

. Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modelling. Int J Mech Sci 2004; 46: 585–608.

10.

Steeves

Fleck

. Material selection in sandwich beam construction. Scripta Mater 2004; 50: 1335–1339.

11.

Kim

Lee

Park

. Evaluation of durability and strength of stitched foam-cored sandwich structures. Compos Struct 1999; 47: 543–550.

12.

Lascoup

Aboura

Khellil

. On the mechanical effect of stitch addition in sandwich panel. Compos Sci Technol 2006; 66: 1385–1398.

13.

Palazotto

Gummadi

LNB

Vaidya

. Low velocity impact damage characteristics of Z-fiber reinforced sandwich panels - an experimental study. Compos Struct 1999; 43: 275–288.

14.

Vaidya

Nelson

Sinn

. Processing and high strain rate impact response of multi-functional sandwich composites. Compos Struct 2001; 52: 429–440.

15.

Chang

Mouritz

Cox

. Properties and failure mechanisms of z-pinned laminates in monotonic and cyclic tension. Compos Part A 2006; 37A: 1501–1513.

16.

Chang

Mouritz

Cox

. Flexural properties of z-pinned laminates. Compos Part A 2007; 38: 224–251.

17.

Mouritz

. Compression properties of z-pinned composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 3110–3120.

18.

Dickinson

Farley

Hinders

. Prediction of effective threedimensional elastic constants of translaminar reinforced composites. J Compos Maters 1999; 33: 1002–1029.

19.

Grassi

Zhang

Meo

. Prediction of stiffness and stresses in z-fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Part A 2002; 33: 1653–1564.

20.

Grassi M. Numerical modelling of composite laminates with throughthickness-reinforcements. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, 2000.

21.

Steeves

Fleck

. In-plane properties of composite laminates with through-thickness pin reinforcement. Int J Solids Struct 2006; 43: 3197–3212.

22.

O'Brien

Krueger

. Influence of compression and shear on the strength of composite laminates with z-pinned reinforcement. Appl Compos Mater 2006; 13: 173–189.

23.

Dransfield

Baillie

Mai

Y-W

. Improving the delamination resistance of CFRP by stitching – a review. Compos Sci Technol 1994; 50: 305–317.

24.

Mouritz

Leong

Herszberg

. A review of the effect of stitching on the in-plane mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part A 1997; 28A: 979–991.

25.

Mouritz

Cox

. A mechanistic approach to the properties of stitched laminates. Compos Part A 2000; 31: 1–27.

26.

Grenestedt

. Development of a new peel-stopper for sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol 2001; 61: 1555–1559.

27.

Wonderly

Grenestedt

. Dynamic performance of a peel stopper for composite sandwich ship structures. J Compos Mater 2004; 38: 805–831.

28.

Jakobsen

Bozhevolnaya

Thomsen

. New peel stopper concept for sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 3378–3385.

29.

Jakobsen

Thomsen

Andreasen

. Crack deflection analyses of different peel stopper designs for sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol 2009; 69: 870–875.

30.

Mitra

. A methodology for improving shear performance of marine grade sandwich composites: Sandwich composite panel with shear key. Compos Struct 2010; 92: 1065–1072.

31.

Mitra

Raja

. Improving delamination resistance capacity of sandwich composite columns with initial face/core debond. Compos Part B 2012; 43: 1604–1612.

32.

Lundsgaard-Larsen

Berggreen

Leif

Carlsson . Tailoring sandwich face/core interfaces for improved damage tolerance—Part I: finite element analysis. Appl Compos Mater 2010; 17: 609–619.

33.

Lundsgaard-Larsen

Berggreen

Leif A

Carlsson

. Tailoring sandwich face/core interfaces for improved damage tolerance—Part II: experiments. Appl Compos Mater 2010; 17: 621–637.

34.

Hirose

Hirokazu

Matsuda

Go Matsubara . Proposal of the concept of splice-type arrester for foam core sandwich panels. Compos Part A 2012; 43: 1318–1325.

35.

ASTM-D3039. ASTM Standard D3039/D3039M–08, Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, Philadelphia, 2008.

36.

ASTM-C297. ASTM Standard C297/C297M–04, Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. ASTM International, Philadelphia, 2004.

37.

ASTM-C365. ASTM Standard C365/C365M–05, Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. ASTM International, Philadelphia, 2005.

38.

ASTM-C273. ASTM Standard C273/C273M–07, Standard test method for shear properties of sandwich core materials. ASTM International, Philadelphia, 2007.

39.

ABAQUS, A-ED. Finite element analysis, ABAQUS 6-9 EF Documentation, in ABAQUS 6-9 EF Documentation, A.-E. Documentation, Editor 2010, DS-Simulia: ABAQUS 6-9 EF Documentation. p. Finite Element Analysis.

40.

Mostafa

Shankar

Morozov

. Effect of shear keys diameter on the shear performance of composite sandwich panel with PVC and PU foam core: FE Study. Compos Struct 2013; 102: 90–100.