Creep behaviour of sandwich panels with rigid polyurethane foam core and glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces: Experimental tests and analytical modelling

Abstract

This paper presents experimental and analytical investigations about the creep behaviour of sandwich panels comprising glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces and rigid polyurethane foam core for civil engineering applications. A full-scale sandwich panel was tested in bending for a period of 3600 h, in a simply supported configuration, subjected to a uniformly distributed load corresponding to 20% of the panel’s flexural strength. Additionally, specimens of polyurethane foam core were tested in shear for a period of 1200 h, for three different load levels corresponding to 10%, 20% and 30% of the foam’s shear strength. Experimental results were fitted using Findley’s power law formulation. Creep coefficients, shear modulus reduction factors and time-dependent shear moduli were obtained for the polyurethane foam in shear. A composed creep model is proposed to simulate the sandwich panel’s long-term creep deformations by considering the individual viscoelastic contributions from (1) the core material in shear and (2) the glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces in tension/compression. The composed creep model predictions adequately reproduced the full-scale panel’s experimental results. In addition, a good agreement was found between the composed creep model predictions and the extrapolation of the power law fitting obtained from the full-scale panel test, for a 50-year period.

Keywords

Creep composites sandwich polyurethane foam glass-fibre reinforced polymer face sheets power law composed creep model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davies

. Lightweight sandwich construction, Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2001, pp. 370–370.

Zenkert

. The Handbook of Sandwich Construction, Worcestershire, UK: Engineering Materials Advisory Services (EMAS), 1997, pp. 442–442.

Keller

Haas

Vallée

. Structural concept, design and experimental verification of a GFRP sandwich roof structure. J Compos Constr 2008; 14: 454–468.

Keller

Vassilopoulos

Manshadi

. Thermomechanical behavior of multifunctional GFRP sandwich structures with encapsulated photovoltaic cells. J Compos Constr 2010; 14: 470–478.

Mills

. Polymer foams handbook: engineering and biomechanics applications and design guide, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007, pp. 562–562.

Huang

J-S

Gibson

. Creep of sandwich beams with polymer foam cores. J Mater Civil Engg 1990; 2: 171–182.

Huang

J-S

Gibson

. Creep of polymer foams. J Mater Sci 1991; 26: 637–647.

Taylor

. Modelling structural insulated panel (SIP) flexural creep deflection. J Struct Engg 1997; 123: 1658–1665.

Shenoi

Allen

Clark

. Cyclic creep and creep-fatigue interaction in sandwich beams. J Strain Anal 1997; 32: 1–18.

10.

Chen

. Flexural creep behaviour of sandwich panels containing Kraft paper honeycomb core and wood composite skins. Mater Sci Engg A 2011; 528: 5621–5626.

11.

Joshi

Muliana

. Deformation in viscoelastic sandwich composites subject to moisture diffusion. Compos Struct 2010; 92: 254–264.

12.

Ramenazi M and Hamed E. On the influence of temperature on the creep response of sandwich beams with a viscoelastic soft core. In: Proceedings of the 6th international composites conference (ACUN-6), Melbourne, Australia, 14–16 November 2012.

13.

Findley

Lai

Onran

. Creep and relaxation of nonlinear viscoelastic materials (with an introduction to linear viscoelasticity), Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976.

14.

Frostig

. High-order theory for sandwich beam behaviour with transversely flexible core. J Engg Mech 1992; 118: 1026–1043.

15.

Frostig

. Hygrothermal (environmental) effects in high-order bending of sandwich beams with a flexible core and a discontinuous skin. Compos Struct 1997; 37: 205–221.

16.

Fam

Sharaf

. Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations. Compos Struct 2010; 92: 2927–2935.

17.

Correia

. GFRP sandwich panels with PU foam and PP honeycomb cores for civil engineering structural applications: Effects of introducing strengthening ribs. Int J Struct Integrity 2012; 3: 127–147.

18.

Manalo

. Flexural behaviour of structural fibre composite sandwich beams in flatwise and edgewise positions. Compos Struct 2010; 92: 984–995.

19.

Sá

. Creep behaviour of pultruded GFRP elements – Part 1: literature review and experimental study. Compos Struct 2011; 93: 2450–2459.

20.

Sá

. Creep behaviour of pultruded GFRP elements – Part 2: analytical study. Compos Struct 2011; 93: 2409–2418.

21.

Gates

Veazie

Brinson

. Creep and physical aging in a polymeric composite: comparison of tension and compression. J Compos Mater 1997; 31: 2478–2505.

22.

Qiao

Barbero

Davalos

. On the linear viscoelasticity of thin-walled laminated composite beams. J Compos Mater 2000; 34: 39–68.

23.

Melo

JDD

Radford

. Viscoelastic characterization of transversely isotropic composite laminae. J Compos Mater 2003; 37: 129–145.

24.

Miyano

Nakada

Cai

. Formulation of long-term creep and fatigue strengths of polymer composites based on accelerated testing methodology. J Compos Mater 2008; 42: 1897–1919.

25.

Findley

. Mechanism and mechanics of creep of plastics and stress relaxation and combined stress creep of plastics, Rhode Island, USA: Division of Engineering, Brown University, 1960.

26.

Holmes

Rahman

. Creep behaviour of glass reinforced plastic box beams. Compos 1980; 11: 79–85.

27.

Bank

Mosallam

. Creep and failure of a full-size fibre reinforced plastic pultruded frame. Compos Engg 1992; 2: 213–227.

28.

Mottram

. Short- and long-term structural properties of pultruded beam assemblies fabricated using adhesive bonding. Compos Struct 1993; 25: 387–395.

29.

Scott

Lai

Zureick

A-H

. Creep behavior of fiber-reinforced polymeric composites: a review of the technical literature. J Reinf Plast Compos 1995; 14: 588–617.

30.

Choi

Yuan

. Time-dependent deformation of pultruded fiber reinforced polymer composite columns. J Compos Constr 2003; 7: 356–362.

31.

Scott

Zureick

A-H

. Compression creep of a pultruded E-glass/vinylester composite. Compos Sci Technol 1998; 58: 1361–1369.

32.

Almeida IA. Structural behaviour of composite sandwich panels for applications in the construction industry. MSc Dissertation in Civil Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon (in Portuguese), 2009.

33.

Gonilha

Correia

Branco

. Creep response of GFRP–concrete hybrid structures: Application to a footbridge prototype. Compos Part B: Engg 2013; 53: 193–206.

34.

Clarke

. Structural design of polymer composites: EUROCOMP Design Code and Handbook. The European Structural Polymeric Composites Group, London: E&FN Spon, 1996, pp. 672–672.

35.

EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2. Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2004.

36.

EN 1995-1-1 Eurocode 5. Design of timber structures – Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2004.