Using the principles of classical micromechanics, analytical equations are developed in this paper to estimate the effective orthotropic properties of a unit cell of strand-based composites according to their constituent phase properties and their microstructural features such as resin thickness, void content and strand geometrical characteristics. Although a special type of strand-based wood composite product, Parallel Strand Lumber, is considered here as an illustrative example, the methodology can be used for other wood composites consisting of high volume fraction of wood strands. The predictive accuracy of the derived analytical equations is investigated through comparisons with numerical results. Finally, applications of these equations in a linear viscoelastic analysis are discussed. The analytical micromechanics models developed here provide an efficient means of computing effective properties of a unit cell of strand-based composites. These models can then be used within a multi-scale modelling framework that has been developed previously to simulate the macroscopic behaviour of structures made of such materials.
Forest Products Laboratory (U.S.). Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material, Madison, WI: Forest Products Society, 1999.
2.
SugimoriMLamF. Macro-void distribution analysis in strand-based wood composites using an X-ray computer tomography technique. J Wood Sci1999; 45: 254–257.
3.
NishimuraTAminJAnsellM. Image analysis and bending properties of model OSB panels as a function of strand distribution, shape and size. Wood Sci Technol2004; 38: 297–309.
4.
Clouston P and Liu S. Predicting the influence of macro-void distribution in parallel wood strand composites. In: 9th world conference on timber engineering, Portland, Oregon, US, 6–10 August 2006, 195–101.
5.
GerekeTMalekmohammadiSNadot-MartinC. Multi-scale stochastic modeling of the elastic properties of strand-based wood composites. J Eng Mech2012; 138: 791–799.
6.
Gereke T, Malekmohammadi S, Nadot-Martin C, et al. A numerical multiscale approach for stiffness predictions of wood composite. In: 26th ASC annual technical conference (the second joint US–Canada conference on composites), Montreal, Canada, 26–28 September, 2011.
7.
KanoutePBosoDPChabocheJL. Multiscale methods for composites: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng2009; 16: 31–75.
8.
StuerzenbecherRHofstetterKSchickhoferG. Development of high-performance strand boards: multiscale modeling of anisotropic elasticity. Wood Sci Technol2010; 44: 205–223.
9.
FanMEnjilyV. Structural properties of oriented wood strand composite: effect of strand orientation and modeling prediction. J Eng Mech-ASCE2009; 135: 1323–1330.
10.
MundyJSBonfieldPW. Predicting the short-term properties of chipboard using composite theory. Wood Sci Technol1998; 32: 237–245.
11.
ShalerSMBlankenhornPR. Composite model prediction of elastic-moduli for flakeboard. Wood Fiber Sci1990; 22: 246–261.
12.
HalpinJKardosJ. Halpin-Tsai equations – review. Polym Eng Sci1976; 16: 344–352.
13.
FaccaAGKortschotMTYanN. Predicting the elastic modulus of natural fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Compos Part A – Appl Sci Manufac2006; 37: 1660–1671.
WuQLLeeJNHanGP. The influence of voids on the engineering constants of oriented strandboard: a finite element model. Wood Fiber Sci2004; 36: 71–83.
16.
CloustonP. Characterization and strength modeling of parallel-strand lumber. Holzforschung2007; 61: 394–399.
17.
BenabouLDuchanoisG. Modelling of the hygroelastic behaviour of a wood-based composite for construction. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 45–53.
18.
DaiCYuCGrovesK. Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. Part II. Resin distribution. Wood Fiber Sci2007; 39: 56–70.
19.
ChristensenRM. Mechanics of composite material, New York: Wiley, 1979.
20.
TuckerCLLiangE. Stiffness predictions for unidirectional short-fiber composites: review and evaluation. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 655–671.
21.
HuangYJinKKHaSK. Effects of fiber arrangement on mechanical behavior of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater2008; 42: 1851–1871.
22.
PinderaMKhatamHDragoAS. Micromechanics of spatially uniform heterogeneous media: a critical review and emerging approaches. Compos Part B-Eng2009; 40: 349–378.
23.
HashinZ. Analysis of composite materials – a survey. J Appl Mech – Trans ASME1983; 50: 481–505.
24.
BudianskyB. On elastic moduli of some heterogeneous materials. J Mech Phys Solids1965; 13: 223–227.
25.
HillR. A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials. J Mech Phys Solids1965; 13: 213–222.
26.
ChristensenRMLoKH. Solutions for effective shear properties in 3 phase sphere and cylinder models. J Mech Phys Solids1979; 27: 315–330.
27.
HashinZ. Theory of fiber reinforced materials, USA: NASA, 1972.
28.
HashinZShtrikmanS. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids1963; 11: 127–140.
29.
WalpoleLJ. On bounds for overall elastic moduli of inhomogeneous systems. 1. J Mech Phys Solids1966; 14: 151–162.
30.
WalpoleLJ. On bounds for overall elastic moduli of inhomogeneous systems 2. J Mech Phys Solids1966; 14: 289–301.
31.
WillisJR. Bounds and self-consistent estimates for overall properties of anisotropic composites. J Mech Phys Solids1977; 25: 185–202.
32.
BrinsonLCLinWS. Comparison of micromechanics methods for effective properties of multiphase viscoelastic composites. Compos Struct1998; 41: 353–367.
33.
HarperLTQianCTurnerTA. Representative volume elements for discontinuous carbon fibre composites – Part 1: boundary conditions. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 225–234.
34.
HinePLustiHGusevA. Numerical simulation of the effects of volume fraction, aspect ratio and fibre length distribution on the elastic and thermoelastic properties of short fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1445–1453.
35.
KariSBergerHGabbertU. Numerical evaluation of effective material properties of randomly distributed short cylindrical fibre composites. Comput Mater Sci2007; 39: 198–204.
36.
KanitTForestSGallietI. Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 3647–3679.
37.
KanitTN'GuyenFForestS. Apparent and effective physical properties of heterogeneous materials: representativity of samples of two materials from food industry. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2006; 195: 3960–3982.
38.
HuetC. Application of variational concepts to size effects in elastic heterogeneous bodies. J Mech Phys Solids1990; 38: 813–841.
39.
XiaZZhangYEllyinF. A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 1907–1921.
40.
ArwadeSRCloustonPLWinansR. Measurement and stochastic computational modeling of the elastic properties of parallel strand lumber. J Eng Mech-ASCE2009; 135: 897–905.
41.
DaiCSteinerP. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance-characteristics 2. Modeling and simulation of a randomly-formed flake layer network. Wood Sci Technol1994; 28: 135–146.
42.
ABAQUS Inc. Abaqus analysis user's manual, 6.10, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA, 2010.
43.
HashinZ. Thermoelastic properties of fiber composites with imperfect interface. Mech Mater1990; 8: 333–348.
44.
NairnJA. Numerical implementation of imperfect interfaces. Comput Mater Sci2007; 40: 525–536.
MatzenmillerAGerlachS. Micromechanical modeling of viscoelastic composites with compliant fiber-matrix bonding. Comput Mater Sci2004; 29: 283–300.
47.
Zobeiry N. Viscoelastic constitutive models for evaluation of residual stresses in thermoset composites during cure. PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 2006.
