This is a contribution to the exercise that aims to benchmark and validate the current continuum damage and fracture mechanics methodologies used for predicting the mechanical behaviour of fibre-reinforced plastic composites under complex loadings. The paper describes an analytical approach to predict the effect of intra- (matrix cracking and splitting) and inter-laminar (delamination) damage on the residual stiffness properties of the laminate, which can be used in the post-initial failure analysis, taking full account of damage mode interaction. The approach is based on a two-dimensional shear lag stress analysis and the equivalent constraint model of the damaged laminate with multiple damaged plies. The application of the approach to predicting degraded stiffness properties of a multidirectional laminate with multilayer intra- and inter-laminar damage is demonstrated for and cross-ply laminates made from a specific glass/epoxy system under in-plane uniaxial and biaxial loading damaged by transverse and longitudinal matrix cracks and crack-induced transverse and longitudinal delamination.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Analysis of composite laminates with intra- and interlaminar damage. Progr Aerospace Sci2005; 41(2): 152–173.
2.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Mechanisms of internal damage and their effect on the behavior and properties of cross-ply composite laminates. Int J Appl Mech2002; 38(6): 641–657.
3.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Analysis of local delaminations in composite laminates with angle ply matrix cracks. Int J Solid Struct2002; 39(6): 1515–1537.
4.
ZinovievPAGrigorievSVLebedevaOV. The strength of multilayered composites under a plane-stress state. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1209–1223.
5.
ZinovievPAGrigorievSVLebedevaOV. A coupled analysis of experimental and theoretical results on the deformation and failure of composite laminates under a state of plane stress. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1711–1723.
6.
BogettiTAHoppelCPRHarikVM. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 329–342.
7.
BogettiTAHoppelCPRHarikVM. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates: correlation with experimental results. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 477–485.
8.
LiuKSTsaiSW. A progressive quadratic failure criterion for a laminate. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1023–1032.
9.
KuraishiATsaiSWLiuKS. A progressive quadratic failure criterion, part B. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1683–1695.
10.
PuckASchürmannA. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1045–1067.
11.
PuckASchürmannA. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1633–1662.
12.
CuntzeRGFreundA. The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 343–377.
13.
CuntzeRG. The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multi-directional laminates—part B. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 487–516.
14.
KaddourASHintonMJSodenPD. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 449–476.
15.
SodenPDKaddourASHintonMJ. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 589–604.
McCartneyLN. Prediction of ply crack formation and failure in laminates. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1619–1631.
18.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Modelling off-axis ply matrix cracking in continuous fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composite laminates. J Mater Sci2006; 41(20): 6789–6799.
19.
ZhangDYeJLamD. Ply cracking and stiffness degradation in cross-ply laminates under biaxial extension, bending and thermal loading. Compos Struct2006; 75(1–4): 121–131.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Kaddour AS and Hinton MJ. Maturity of 3D failure criteria for fibre reinforced composites: Comparison between theories and experiments: Part B of WWFE-II. J Compos Mater 2013; 47(6–7): 925–966.
24.
ZhangJFanJSoutisC. Analysis of multiple matrix cracking in composite laminates. Part 1: In-plane stiffness properties. Composites1992; 23(9): 291–298.
25.
ZhangJFanJSoutisC. Analysis of multiple matrix cracking in composite laminates. Part 2: Development of transverse ply cracks. Composites1992; 23(9): 299–294.
26.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Application of the equivalent constraint model to investigate stiffness properties of transversally cracked and split FRP laminates. Adv Compos Lett1999; 8(5): 205–211.
27.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. A study of matrix crack tip delaminations and their influence on composite laminate stiffness. Adv Compos Lett1999; 8(4): 149–156.
28.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Modelling stiffness degradation due to matrix cracking in angle‐ply composite laminates. Plast Rubber Compos2000; 29(9): 482–488.
29.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Stiffness degradation in cross-ply laminates damaged by transverse cracking and splitting. Compos Part A2000; 31(4): 335–351.
30.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. The effect of delaminations induced by transverse cracking and splitting on stiffness properties of composite laminates. Compos Part A2000; 31(2): 107–119.
31.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Strain energy release rate for off-axis ply cracking in laminated composites. Int J Fract2001; 112(2): L3–L8.
32.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Stress analysis of angle-ply laminates with matrix cracks. ZAMM2001; 81, Suppl 2, S371–S372.
33.
SoutisCKashtalyanM. Delamination growth and residual properties of cracked orthotropic laminates under tensile loading. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2002; 15(1): 13–22.
34.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Stiffness and fracture analysis of laminated composites with off-axis ply matrix cracking. Compos A Appl Sci Manufact2007; 38(4): 1262–1269.
35.
FanJZhangJ. In-situ damage evolution and micro/macro transition for laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1993; 47: 107–118.
36.
ZhangJHerrmannKP. Stiffness degradation induced by multilayer intralaminar cracking in composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manufact1999; 30(5): 683–706.
37.
BerthelotJM. Analysis of the transverse cracking of cross-ply laminates: a generalised approach. J Compos Mater1997; 31(18): 1780–1805.
38.
KaterelosDTGKashtalyanMSoutisC. Matrix cracking in polymeric composites laminates. Modelling and experiments. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(12): 2310–2317.
39.
HashinZ. Analysis of orthogonally cracked laminate under tension. Trans ASME J Appl Mech1987; 54: 872–879.
40.
TsaiCLDanielIM. Behavior of cracked cross-ply composite laminate under shear loading. Int J Solid Struct1992; 29(24): 3251–3267.
41.
Henaff-GardinCLafarie-FrenotMCGambyD. Doubly periodic matrix cracking in composite laminates Part 1: General in-plane loading. Compos Struct1996; 36(1–2): 113–130.
42.
Henaff-GardinCLafarie-FrenotMCGambyD. Doubly periodic matrix cracking in composite laminates Part 2: Thermal biaxial loading. Compos Struct1996; 36(1–2): 131–140.
43.
Diaz ValdesSHSoutisC. Health monitoring of composites using Lamb waves generated by piezo-electric devices. Plast Rubber Compos2000; 29(9): 496–502.
44.
DiamantiKSoutisCHodgkinsonJM. Lamb waves for the non-destructive inspection of monolithic and sandwich composite beams. Compos A2005; 36(2): 189–195.
45.
DiamantiKSoutisC. Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures. Progr Aerospace Sci2010; 46(8): 343–352.
46.
JumahatASoutisCJonesFR. Fracture mechanisms and failure analysis of carbon fibre/toughened epoxy composites subjected to compressive loading. Compos Struct2010; 92(2): 295–305.
