Application of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel as an energy absorber of high-speed train nose

Abstract

Since train’s frontal nose is the first part of the train which is damaged at the frontal impact, specific attention should be paid to the design of this part. In this study, an effort has been conducted to the design of a nose with light weight which can absorb maximum amount of energy that is possible during a frontal collision. To this aim and with attention to aerodynamic considerations, application of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel has been studied. This paper includes two main parts. The first part is dedicated to the simulation of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel, while the frontal collision of nose with different internal layer thicknesses of honeycomb and various nose lengths have been simulated in the second part. Finite element method using LS-DYNA commercial package has been used for the numerical simulation. The results have been validated with available experimental results and an acceptable agreement has been observed.

Keywords

Aluminium honeycomb nose high-speed train collision energy absorption

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hosseini-Tehrani

Nankali

. Study on characteristics of a crashworthy high-speed train nose. Int J Crashworthiness 2010; 15(2): 161–173.

Kirkpatrick

Schroeder

Simons

. Evaluation of passenger rail vehicles crashworthiness. Int J Crashworthiness 2001; 6(1): 95–106.

David C Tayrell and Elloy E Martinez. Crashworthiness study of locomotive wide nose short hood designs. ASME, AMD Vol. 237/BED Vol. 45, Nashville, Tennessee, 15–19 November, 1999.

Sung-Tae Hong, Jwo Pan, Tau Tyan, et al. Dynamic crush behaviors of aluminum honeycomb specimens under compression dominant inclined loads. Int J Plast 2008; 24: 89–117.

Santosa

Wierzbicki

. Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam. Computers Struct 1998; 68: 343–367.

Heimbs S, Middendorf P and Maier M. Honeycomb sandwich material modeling for dynamic simulation of aircraft interior components. In: 9th international LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, MI, USA, 4–6 June, 2006.

Ahmed Abbadi, Koutsawa

Carmasol

. Experimental and numerical characterization of honeycomb sandwich composite panels. J Simulating Modeling Practice and Theory 2009; 17: 1533–1547.

Schnabl

Planinc

. The influence of boundary conditions and axial deformability on buckling behavior of two-layer composite columns with interlayer slip. J Eng Struct 2010; 32: 3103–3111.

Burlayenko

Sadowski

. Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels. J Compos Struct 2010; 92: 2890–2900.

10.

Wang

. Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng 2009; 36: 110–114.

11.

Petras

Sutcliffe

MPF

. Failure mode maps for honeycomb sandwich panels. J Compos Struct 1999; 44: 237–252.

12.

ASTM C 365–03. Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores, Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 2003.

13.

ASTM C 273–00. Standard test method for shear properties of sandwich core materials, Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 2000.

14.

LS-DYNA. Keyword user’s manual, Version 970. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, (LSTC), Livermore, California, 2003, 2003.