High particle content B4C/Al composites reinforced with different particle sizes were fabricated. Based on the tensile and compressive stress–strain behaviors of these composites, the effective medium approach was employed to investigate the load partition behaviors between the matrix and reinforcement. The results showed that the load borne by the particles increased in compression, which lead to larger compressive strength than the tensile strength. Meanwhile, the load borne by particles increased with decreasing particle size during compression. These observations were rationalized based on the combined theories of geometrically necessary dislocations and metal-based cemented granular material behaviors.
WeiQKecskesLJiaoT. Adiabatic shear banding in ultrafine-grained Fe processed by severe plastic deformation. Acta Mater2004; 52: 1859–1869.
2.
LeeSChoKMKimKC. Adiabatic shear band formation in Al-SiC w composites. Metall Trans1993; 24A: 895–900.
3.
LingZLuoLDoddB. Experimental study on the formation of shear bands and effect of microstructure in Al-2124/SiCp composites under dynamic compression. J Phys IV1994; 4: 453–458.
4.
DaiLHLiuLFBaiYL. Effect of particle size on the formation of adiabatic shear band in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Lett2004; 58: 1773–1776.
5.
RameshKT. On the localization of shearing deformations in tungsten heavy alloys. Mech Mater1994; 17: 165–173.
6.
MeyersMANesterenkoVFLasalviaJC. Shear localization in dynamic deformation of materials: microstructural evolution and self-organization. Mater Sci Eng A2001; 317: 204–215.
7.
TanZHPangBJGaiBZ. The dynamic mechanical response of SiC particulate reinforced 2024 aluminum matrix composites. Mater Lett2007; 61: 4606–4609.
8.
TanZHPangBJQinDT. The compressive properties of 2024Al matrix composites reinforced with high content SiC particles at various strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 489: 302–309.
9.
ZhuDZWuGHChenGQ. Dynamic deformation behavior of a high reinforcement content TiB2/Al composite at high strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 487: 536–540.
10.
LiuBHuangWMHuangL. Size-dependent compression deformation behaviors of high particle content B4C/Al composites. Mater Sci Eng A2012; 534: 530–535.
11.
WegnerLDGibsonLJ. Mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites - I: modelling. Int J Mech Sci2000; 42: 925–942.
12.
WegnerLDGibsonLJ. Mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites - II: a case study of a three-dimensionally printed material. Int J Mech Sci2000; 42: 943–964.
13.
WegnerLDGibsonLJ. Mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites - III: resin-impregnated porous stainless steel. Int J Mech Sci2000; 43: 1061–1072.
14.
KouzeliMDunandDC. Effect of reinforcement connectivity on the elasto-plastic behavior of aluminum composites containing sub-micron alumina particles. Acta Mater2003; 51: 6105–6121.
15.
FengXQTianZLiuYH. Effective elastic and plastic properties of interpenetrating multiphase composites. Appl Compos Mater2004; 1: 133–155.
16.
WilkinsonDSPompeWOeschnerM. Modeling the mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous multi-phase materials. Prog Mater Sci2001; 46: 379–405.
17.
CorbinSFWilkinsonDS. The influence of particle distribution on the mechanical response of a particulate metal matrix composite. Acta Metall Mater1994; 42: 1311–1318.
18.
ChristensenRM. Mechanics of composite materials, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1979, pp. 32–58.
KouzeliMMarchiCSMortensenA. Effect of reaction on the tensile behavior of infiltrated boron carbide-aluminum composites. Mater Sci Eng A2002; 337: 264–273.
21.
TopinVDelenneJ-YRadjaF. Strength and failure of cemented granular matter. Eur Phys J E2007; 23: 413–429.
22.
MerchantIJMacpheeDEChandlerHW. Toughening cement-based materials through the control of interfacial bonding. Cem Concr Res2001; 31: 1873–1880.
23.
BenhamidaABouchelaghemFDumontetH. Effective properties of a cemented or an injected granular material. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2005; 29: 187–208.
24.
TanHHuangYLiuC. The uniaxial tension of particulate composite materials with nonlinear interface debonding. Int J Solids Struct2007; 44: 1809–1818.
25.
DvorkinJMavkoGNurA. The effect of cementation on the elastic properties of granular material. Mech Mater1991; 12: 207–217.
YinHDvorkinJ. Strength of cemented grains. Geophys Res Lett1994; 21: 903–906.
28.
GallagherJJFriedmanMHandinJ. Experimental studies relating to microfracture in sandstone. Tectonophysics1974; 21: 203–247.
29.
WongTFWuLC. Tensile stress concentration and compressive failure in cemented granular material. Geophys Res Lett1995; 22: 1649–1652.
30.
NanCWClarkeDR. The influence of particle size and particle fracture on the elastic/plastic deformation of metal matrix composites. Acta Mater1996; 44: 3801–3811.
31.
NanCWClarkeDR. Modeling the elastic-plastic deformation of Al/Al2O3 particulate composites. J Am Ceram Soc1997; 80: 237–240.
32.
FuSYFengXQLaukeB. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer composites. Composites Part B2008; 39: 933–961.
33.
VogelsangMArsenaultRJFisherRM. An in situ HVEM study of dislocation generation at Al/SiC interfaces in metal matrix composites. Metall Trans A1986; 17: 379–389.
34.
ArsenaultRJWangLFengCR. Strengthening of composites due to microstructural changes in the matrix. Acta Metall Mater1991; 39: 47–57.
LiuLFDaiLHYangGW. Strain gradient effects on deformation strengthening behavior of particles reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 345: 190–196.
37.
YanYWGengLLiAB. Experimental and numerical studies of the effect of particle size on the deformation behavior of the metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2007; 448: 315–325.
GaoHHuangY. Taylor-based nonlocal theory of plasticity. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38: 2615–2637.
40.
XueZHuangYLiM. Particle size effect in metallic materials: a study by the theory of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Acta Mater2002; 50: 149–160.
41.
ShaoJCXiaoBLWangQZ. An enhanced FEM model for particle size dependent strengthening and interface damage in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 39–45.
42.
NixWDGaoH. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids1998; 46: 411–425.
43.
ClyneTWWitherPJ. An introduction to metal matrix composites, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Bourgeois N. Caractérisation et modélisation micromécanique du comportement et de l’endomagement d’un composite à matrice métallique: Al/SiCp. PhD Thesis, Ecole Centrale de Paris, France, 1994.
46.
Kouzeli M. Tensile behavior of aluminium reinforced with ceramic particles. PhD Thesis (No. 2348), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland, 2001.
47.
KouzeliMWeberLMarchiCS. Quantification of microdamage phenomena during tensile straining of high volume fraction particle reinforced aluminum. Acta Mater2001; 49: 497–505.
48.
BrunoMS. Microstructural analysis of the inelastic behavior of sedimentary rock. Mech Mater1991; 12: 95–118.
49.
DvorkinJ. Large strains in cemented granular aggregates: elastic-plastic cement. Mech Mater1996; 23: 29–41.
50.
WangYHLeungSC. A particulate-scale investigation of cemented sand behavior. Can Geotech J2008; 45: 29–44.
