High-strength carbon fibers were treated with nitric acid and periodically analyzed by several different methods to develop an understanding of overall property changes and how they relate to composite design. Fiber diameter, tensile strength, surface morphology, surface chemistry and surface energy were all evaluated as a function of treatment time and two distinct stages of change were identified; the first characterized by surface modification and the second by carbon material loss. Initially, the tensile strength, degree of surface oxidation and surface energy all increased. The surface oxidation consisted primarily of carbonyl and carboxylic acid types. Then in the second stage, both the tensile strength and surface oxidation reached stable levels and the fiber diameter began to rapidly decrease. The surface morphology and energy were the only properties that showed no obvious changes from one stage to the next. The surfaces were found to be smooth through all treatment times and the energy increased steadily throughout. It is believed that the variation of all of these properties is related to the fiber microstructure and how it varies through the cross-section of high-strength fibers. Specifically, high-strength carbon fibers are known to have better microstructural organization and alignment in the near-surface layer than within the interior.
DrzalLTRichMJLloydPF. Adhesion of graphite fibers to epoxy matrices: I. the role of fiber surface treatment. J Adhesion1982; 16: 1–30.
2.
Fitzer E, Geigl KH and Manocha LM. Surface chemistry of carbon fibers and its influence on mechanical properties of phenolic based composites. In: 5th Industrial Conference on Carbon and Graphite, Soc of Chem Ind, London, 1978, pp.405.
3.
Lanhong X, Mase T and Drzal LT. Improving adhesion between carbon fibers and vinyl ester resins. In: 3rd Annual SPE Automotive Composites Conf, Society of Plastics Engineers, MSU Management Education Center, Automotive & Composites Divisions, Troy, Michigan, 9–10 September 2003, pp.1–11.
4.
Xu L and Drzal LT. Influence of interphase chemistry and properties on the adhesion between vinyl ester resin and carbon fibers. In Adhesion Society 23rd Annual Technical Meeting, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 20–23 February 2000, pp.1573–1582.
5.
Rich MJ, Corbin SM and Drzal LT. Adhesion of carbon fibers to vinyl ester matrices. SME Technical Paper AD00-241, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 2000, pp.1–10.
McKeeDW. The copper-catalyzed oxidation of graphite. Carbon1970; 8: 131–139.
8.
Plueddemann EP. Interfaces in polymer matrix composites. In: Broutman LJ and Krock RH (eds) Composite Materials, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 217–284.
9.
DonnetJBEhrburgerP. Carbon fiber in polymer reinforcement. Carbon1977; 15: 143–152.
10.
NoharaLBFilhoGPNoharaEL. Evaluation of carbon fiber surface treated by chemical and cold plasma processes. Mater Res2005; 8(3): 281–286.
11.
Donnet JB, Dong S, Guilman G, et al. Carbon fibers electrochemical and plasma surface treatment. In: ICCI-II, Interfaces in Polymer, Ceramic and Metal Matrix Composites. New York: Elsevier Sci., 1988, pp.35–42.
12.
YuanLYShyuSSLaiJY. Plasma surface treatments on carbon fibers, II. Mechanical properties and interfacial shear strength. J Appl Polym Sci1991; 42: 2525–2534.
13.
BascomWDChenWJ. Effect of plasma treatment on the adhesion of carbon fibers to thermoplastic polymers. J Adhesion1991; 34: 99–119.
14.
Garbassi F and Occhiello E. Surface plasma treatment. Handbook of composites reinforcements. New York: VCH Publications, 1993, pp.625–630.
15.
JainRKManochaLMBahlOP. Surface treatment of carbon fibers with nitric acid and its influence on the mechanical behaviour of composites made with phenolic and furan as matrices. Indian J Technol1991; 29: 163–172.
16.
Diefendorf RJ and Tokarsky EW. The relationships of structure to properties in graphite fibers, Part I. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Technical Report APRIL-TR-72-133, Part I, 1971.
17.
JangBZ. Control of interfacial adhesion in continuous carbon and Kevlar fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol1992; 44: 333–349.
KaelbleDHDynesPJCirlinEH. Interfacial bonding and environmental stability of polymer matrix composites. J Adhesion1974; 6(6): 23–48.
20.
MoulderJFStickleWFSobolPE. Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: A reference book of standard spectra for identification and interpretation of XPS data, Eden Prairie MN: Perkin-Elmer, 1995.
21.
LangleyLVillanuevaDFairbrotherD. Quantification of surface oxides on carbonaceous materials. Chem Mat2006; 18(1): 169–178.
22.
Neumann AW and Tanner W. Continuous measurement of the time dependence of contact angles between individual fibres and surfactant solutions. In: Fifth International Congress of Surface Activity B, vol. 2, Barcelona, Spain, 1968, pp.727–734, London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.
23.
Mozzo G and Chabord R. Contribution to the study of glass-resin adhesion. In: 23rd Annual Technical Conf. on Reinforced Plastics/Composites Division, Soc. Plastics Industry, Section 9-C, 1968, pp.1–8.
24.
ChenMYangTMaZ. Investigation of RF styrene plasma by emission spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci1995; 23(2): 151–155.
25.
AkhterMSChughtaiARSmithDM. Spectroscopic studies of oxidized soots. Appl Spec1991; 45(4): 653–665.
26.
SmithDMChughtaiAR. The surface-structure and reactivity of black carbon. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects1995; 105(1): 47–77.
27.
BoehmHP. Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment. Carbon2002; 40(2): 145–149.
28.
JiangZXLiuYSunXP. Activated carbons chemically modified by concentrated H2SO4 for the adsorption of the pollutants from wastewater and the dibenzothiophene from fuel oils. Langmiur2003; 19(3): 731–736.
29.
SellittiCKoenigJLIshidaH. Surface characterization of graphitized carbon fibers by attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Carbon1990; 28(1): 221–228.
30.
Domingo-GarciaMGarzonFJLPerez-MendozaMJ. On the characterization of chemical surface groups of carbon materials. Colloid Interface Sci2002; 248(1): 116–122.
31.
DanielIMIshaiO. Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 49–49.
Griffith AA. The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. In: Philos Trans R Soc., Series A, vol. 221, London, 1921, pp.163–198.
34.
PickeringKLMurrayTL. Weak link scaling analysis of high-strength carbon fibre. Composites: Part A1999; 30: 1017–1021.
35.
Ogihara S, Imafuku Y, Yamamoto R, et al. Application of FIB technique to introduction of a notch into a carbon fiber for direct measurement of fracture toughness. In: Third international symposium on atomic technology, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Tokyo, Japan, 191: 012009, 2009, pp.1–6.
36.
PittmanCUJrHeG-RWuB. Chemical modification of carbon fiber surfaces by nitric acid oxidation followed by reaction with tetraethylenepentamine. Carbon1997; 35(3): 317–331.
37.
AnslynEVDoughertyDAIntroduction to structure and models of bonding. In: MurdzekJ (eds). Modern physical organic chemistry, Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, 2006, pp. 25–25.
38.
DonnetJBBansalRC. Carbon fibers, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1984, pp. 232–232.
39.
Bobka RJ and Lowell LP. Integrated research on carbon fiber composite materials. Technical Report AFML-TR-66-310, Part 1, Air Force Materials Laboratory, October 1960: 145–152.
40.
PallozziAA. Carbon fiber reinforcement of epoxy resins. Soc Plast Eng J1966; 8: 21–22.
