This study addresses the issue of structural damage identification and location in carbon fiber reinforced polymer plates using electrical measurements. Electrical resistance tomography is presented as a method for structural damage localization in composite parts. A set of electrodes is fixed on the edges of the part and combinations of DC current injections and voltage measurements are applied to the system. The change of voltage between different times in the part’s service life (e.g. start and degraded) are monitored. These sets of measurements are used as input to inversely calculate conductivity maps for the complete composite part and thus indirectly assess its structural health. Such processes are inherently ill-posed. Data post-processing approaches are proposed here to diminish this uncertainty and to conclude to an optimally converge solution of the inverse problem. To assist the process, a material-originating mathematical constraint is introduced. The method is applied on carbon fiber reinforced polymer plates for different damage modes. Experimental recordings show that the analysis of electrical fields allows detecting the presence of damage. Discontinuities as small as 0.1% of the inspected area can be sensed. The proposed data post-processing techniques were applied and conductivity maps were calculated. The results show that using these techniques locating damage is possible with less than 10% error. Material-based constraints greatly enhance the prediction of the data post-processing techniques. It is believed that by overcoming certain implementation issues, electrical resistance tomography could evolve in the direction of a non-destructive evaluation or a structural health monitoring technique for composite structures.
WangDWangSChungDDL. Method of sensing impact damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. J Mater Sci2006; 41(8): 2281–2289.
8.
HustonD. Structural sensing, health monitoring and performance evaluation, Chap. 1. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2009.
9.
LiepaVSantosaFVogeliusM. Crack determination from boundary measurements reconstruction using experimental data. J Nondestr Eval1993; 12(3): 163–174.
10.
ShtraussV. Structure evaluation of materials by electrical methods. Mech Compos Mater1996; 32(1): 90–97.
11.
SchuelerRJoshiSPSchulteK. Damage detection in CFRP by electrical conductivity mapping. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(6): 921–930.
12.
TodorokiATanakaYShimamuraY. Delamination monitoring of graphite/epoxy laminated composite plate of electric resistance change method. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1151–1160.
13.
Lemoine GI, Love KW and Anderson TA. An electric potential-based structural health monitoring technique using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring: From Diagnostics and Prognostics to Structural Health Management (ed Chang F-K), Stanford, CA, USA, 15--17 September 2003, pp. 387--394. Seattle, WA: Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington.
14.
Ross R and Hinton Y. Damage diagnosis in semiconductive materials using electrical impedance measurements. In: Proceedings of the 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Schaumburg, IL, USA, 7–10 April 2008, paper no. AIAA-2008-1936. Reston, VA: AIAA.
15.
TodorokiATanakaYShimamuraY. Electrical resistance change method for monitoring delaminations of CFRP laminates: effect of spacing between electrodes. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 37–46.
16.
WangDChungDDL. Comparative evaluation of the electrical configurations for the two-dimensional electric potential method of damage monitoring in carbon fiber polymer–matrix composite. Smart Mater Struct2006; 15: 1332–1344.
17.
KrivkaIProkesJStejskalJ. Resistivity mapping: an example of aged conducting polymer. Polym Degrad Stab2007; 92: 829–837.
18.
AngelidisNKhemiriNIrvingPE. Experimental and finite element study of the electrical potential technique for damage detection in CFRP laminates. Smart Mater Struct2005; 14: 147–154.
19.
WangDWangSChungDDL. Sensitivity of the two-dimensional electric potential/resistance method for damage monitoring in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. J Mater Sci2006; 41: 4839–4846.
20.
TodorokiA. Delamination monitoring analysis of CFRP structures using multi-probe electrical method. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2008; 19(3): 291–298.
21.
AngelidisNIrvingPE. Detection of impact damage in CFRP laminates by means of electrical potential techniques. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 594–604.
22.
Lemistre M and Balageas D. Hybrid electromagnetic method for NDE of GFRP and CFRP composites materials. In: 10th SPIE international symposium on NDE for health monitoring and diagnostics (ed T Kundu), San Diego, CA, USA, 7–9 May 2005, Vol. 5768, pp.212–220. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
23.
TodorokiATanakaMShimamuraY. High performance estimations of delamination of graphite/epoxy laminates with electric resistance change method. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63(13): 1911–1920.
24.
GriffithsDHBarkerRD. Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophys1993; 29(3–4): 211–226.
25.
LionheartWPolydoridesNBorsicAThe reconstruction problem, in electrical impedance tomography: methods, history and applications. In: HolderD (eds). Electrical impedance tomography: methods, history and applications, Bristol, UK: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2005, pp. 3–64.
26.
KaipioJSomersaloE. Statistical and computational inverse problems applied mathematical sciences2005; Vol. 160. New York: Springer.
27.
TarantolaA. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2005. ISBN 0-89871-572-5.
28.
Polydorides N. Image reconstruction algorithms for soft-field tomography. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK, 2002.
29.
GolubGHVon MatUTikhonov regularization for large scale problems. In: GolubGHLuiSHLukF (eds). Workshop on scientific computing, New York: Springer, 1997, pp. 3–26.
30.
VauhkonenMVadaszDKarjalainenPA. Tikhonov regularization and prior information in electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1998; 17(2): 285–293.
31.
KarhunenKSeppänenALehikoinenA. Electrical resistance tomography imaging of concrete. Cem Concr Res2010; 40: 137–145.
32.
LohKJHouTCLynchJP. Carbon nanotube sensing skins for spatial strain and impact damage identification. J Nondestruct Eval2009; 28: 9–25.
33.
HouTCLohKJLynchJP. Spatial conductivity mapping of carbon nanotube composite thin films by electrical impedance tomography for sensing applications. Nanotechnology2007; 18: 315 501–315 501.
34.
WordenKFarrarCRMansonG. The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proc R Soc London, Ser A2007; 463: 1639–1664.
35.
HansenPCO’LearyDR. The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Comput1993; 14(6): 1487–1503.
36.
HansenPCThe L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems. In: JohnstonP (eds). Computational inverse problems in electrocardiology, Southampton: WIT Press, 2001, pp. 119–142.
37.
AdlerAGuardoR. Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1996; 15(2): 170–179.
38.
CheneyMIsaacsonD. Distinguishability in impedance imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1992; 39: 852–860.
39.
KaupinnenPHyttinenJMalmivuoJ. Sensitivity distribution visualizations of impedance tomography measurement strategies. Int J Bioelectromagn2006; 8(1): VII/1–9.
40.
GeselowitzDB. An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1971; BME-18: 38–41.
41.
PolydoridesNLionheartWRB. A matlab toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the electrical impedance and diffuse optical reconstruction software project. Meas Sci Technol2002; 13: 1871–1883.
42.
SchöberlJ. NETGEN: an advancing front 2D/3D mesh generator based on abstract rules. Comput Visual Sci1997; 1(1): 41–52.
43.
Baltopoulos A, Vavouliotis A, Kostopoulos V, et al. Electrical tomography as a tool for non-destructive assessment of composite structures, . In: Emerging technologies in non-destructive testing V (ed Paipetis A et al.), Ioannina, Greece, 19--21 September 2011, pp. 389--394. London: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN 978-0-415-62131-1.
44.
Baltopoulos A, Polydorides N, Vavouliotis A, et al. Sensing capabilities of multifunctional composite materials using carbon nanotubes. In: 61st international astronautical congress, IAC 2010, International Astronautical Federation, Prague, Czech Republic, 27 September–1 October 2010, 13, pp.11004–11012.
45.
AthanasopoulosNKostopoulosV. Prediction and experimental validation of the electrical conductivity of dry carbon fiber unidirectional layers. Composites Part B2011; 42(6): 1578–1587.
46.
TodorokiATanakaMShimanuraY. Measurement of orthotropic electric conductance of CFRP laminates and analysis of the effect on delamination monitoring with an electric resistance change method. Compos Sci Technol2000; 62: 619–628.
47.
GaierJRYoderVandenbergYBerkebileS. The electrical and thermal conductivity of woven pristine and intercalated graphite fiber–polymer composites. Carbon2003; 41(12): 2187–2193.
48.
Todoroki A, Hirai N and Matsuzaki R. Electrical resistance change method for delamination monitoring of CFRP plates: effect of plate scale. In: Shull PJ, Wu HF, Diaz AA, et al. (eds) Nondestructive characterization for composite materials, aerospace engineering, civil infrastructure, and homeland security 2008. Bellingham, WA: SPIE, Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 6934, 693404, doi: 10.1117/12.776125.
49.
SuzukiYTodorokiAMatsuzakiR. Impact-damage visualization in CFRP by resistive heating: development of a new detection method for indentations caused by impact loads. Composites Part A2012; 43: 53–64.
50.
TodorokiASuzukiKMizutaniY. Durability estimates of copper plated electrodes for self-sensing CFRP composites. J Solid Mech Mater Eng2010; 4(6): 610–620.
