In this article, the effect of nanoceramic reinforcements on the mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites was critically reviewed. Reinforcement of an Al alloy with nanoceramic particulates is expected to improve its tensile strength. This article also reports the role of an integrated optimization approach using an artificial neural network and a modified particle swarm to solve a process parameter design problem in casting of this class of metal matrix nanocomposites. The artificial neural network is used to obtain the relationships between decision variables and the performance measures of interest, while the particle swarm is used to perform the optimization with multiple objectives.
MazaheryAShabaniMO. Process conditions optimization in Al–Cu alloy matrix composites. Powder Technol2012; 217: 558–565.
2.
ShabaniMOMazaheryA. The ANN application in FEM modeling of mechanical properties of Al–Si alloy. Appl Math Model2011; 35: 5707–5713.
3.
RazaviMRahimipourMRRajabi-ZamaniAH. Effect of nanocrystalline TiC powder addition on the hardness and wear resistance of cast iron. Mater Sci Eng A2007; 454–455: 144–147.
4.
MazaheryAShabaniMO. Influence of the hard coated B4C particulates on wear resistance of Al–Cu alloys. Composites Part B2012; 43: 1302–1308.
5.
VenclABobicIArosteguiS. Structural, mechanical and tribological properties of A356 aluminium alloy reinforced with Al2O3, SiC and SiC + graphite particles. J Alloys Compd2010; 506: 631–639.
6.
ShabaniMOMazaheryA. Application of finite element model and artificial neural network in characterization of al matrix nanocomposites using various training algorithms. Metall Mater Trans A2012; 43: 2158–2165.
7.
XiongBXuZYanQ. Effects of SiC volume fraction and aluminum particulate size on interfacial reactions in SiC nanoparticulate reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Alloys Compd2011; 509: 1187–1191.
8.
SajjadiSAEzatpourHRTorabi PariziM. Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir and compo-casting processes. J Mater Des2012; 34: 106–111.
9.
NguyenQGuptaM. Enhancing compressive response of AZ31B using nano-Al2O3 and copper additions. J Alloys Compd2010; 490: 382–387.
10.
HassanSFGuptaM. Enhancing physical and mechanical properties of Mg using nanosized Al2O3 particulates as reinforcement. Metall Mater Trans A2005; 36: 2253–2258.
11.
ShabaniMOMazaheryA. Prediction of wear properties in A356 matrix composite reinforced with B4C particulates. Synth Met2011; 161: 1226–1231.
12.
FerkelHMordikeBL. Magnesium strengthened by SiC nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A2001; 298: 193–199.
13.
GrozaJR. Sintering of nanocrystalline powders. Int J Powder Metall1999; 35: 59–66.
14.
AkioKAtsushiOToshiroK. Fabrication, process of metal matrix composite with nano-size SiC particle produced by vortex method. J Jpn Inst Light Met1999; 49: 149–154.
15.
MazaheryAShabaniMO. Investigation on mechanical properties of nano-Al2O3-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Compos Mater2011; 45: 2579–2586.
16.
Habibnejad-KorayemaMMahmudiRPoolebWJ. Enhanced properties of Mg-based nano-composites reinforced with Al2O3 nano-particles. Mater Sci Eng A2009; 519: 198–203.
17.
AmirkhanlouSNiroumandB. Development of Al356/SiCp cast composites by injection of SiCp containing composite powders. J Mater Des2011; 32: 1895–1902.
18.
TahaMAEl-MahallawyNA. Metal–matrix composites fabricated by pressure-assisted infiltration of loose ceramic powder. J Mater Process Technol1998; 73: 139–146.
19.
KokM. Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater Process Technol2005; 161: 381–387.
20.
AsthanaRRohatgiPK. Melt infiltration of SiC compacts-I. Study of infiltration dynamics. Z Metallkd1992; 83(12): 887–892.
21.
IbrahimIAMohamedFALaverniaEJ. Particulate reinforced metal matrix composites - a review. J Mater Sci1991; 26: 1137–1156.
22.
ZhaoYTZhangSLChenG. In situ (Al2O3 + Al3Zr)np/Al nanocomposites synthesized by magneto-chemical melt reaction. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 1463–1470.
23.
Gómez-CarracedoMPGestalMDoradoJ. Linking chemical knowledge and genetic algorithms using two populations and focused multimodal search. Chemom Intell Lab Syst2007; 87: 173–184.
24.
BehnamianJZandiehM. A discrete colonial competitive algorithm for hybrid flowshop scheduling to minimize earliness and quadratic tardiness penalties. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38: 14490–14498.
25.
SadighANMozafariMKarimiB. Manufacturer–retailer supply chain coordination: a bi-level programming approach. Adv Eng Software2012; 45: 144–152.
26.
KavehATalatahariS. Optimum design of skeletal structures using imperialist competitive algorithm. Comput Struct2010; 88: 1220–1229.
27.
TalatahariSFarahmand AzarBSheikholeslamiR. Imperialist competitive algorithm combined with chaos for global optimization. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat2012; 17: 1312–1319.
28.
ShabaniMOMazaheryABahmaniA. Solidification of A356 Al alloy: experimental study and modeling. Kovove Mater2011; 49: 253–258.
29.
TsaiC-YKaoI-W. Particle swarm optimization with selective particle regeneration for data clustering. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38: 6565–6576.
30.
ZhaoLQianFYangY. Automatically extracting T–S fuzzy models using cooperative random learning particle swarm optimization. Appl Soft Comput2010; 10: 938–944.
31.
ShabaniMOMazaheryADavamiP. Silicon morphology modelling during solidification process of A356 Al alloy. Int J Cast Met Res2012; 25: 53–58.
32.
PendharkarPC. A threshold-varying artificial neural network approach for classification and its application to bankruptcy prediction problem. Comput Oper Res2005; 32: 2561–2582.
33.
CelliGGhianiEMocciS. A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for the sizing and siting of distributed generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst2005; 20(2): 750–757.
34.
SafariAJahaniRShayanfarHA. Optimal DG allocation in distribution network. Int J Electr Eng2010; 4(8): 550–553.
35.
YoshidaHKawataKFukuyamaY. A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst2000; 15: 1232–1239.
36.
ShabaniMOMazaheryA. The GA optimization performance in the microstructure and mechanical properties of MMNCs. Trans Indian Inst Met2012; 65: 77–83.
37.
Kennedy J and Mendes R. Population structure and particle swarm performance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Honolulu, HI, 12–17 May 2002, vol. 2, pp.1671–1676. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
38.
MazaheryAShabaniMO. A356 reinforced with nanoparticles: numerical analysis of mechanical properties. JOM J Miner Met Mater Soc2012; 64: 323–329.
39.
Liang JJ, Qin AK, Suganthan PN, et al. Particle swarm optimization algorithms with novel learning strategies. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on systems, man and cybernetics, the Hague, Netherlands, 10–13 October 2004, vol. 4, pp.3659–3664. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
