In this study, acoustic emission was evaluated as a supplementary nondestructive testing method for detecting damage initiation and progression, identifying the site of damage, and anticipating ultimate fracture in notched full-scale honeycomb sandwich composite fuselage panels using redundant arrays of different acoustic emission sensor models. Each panel contained different damage scenarios and was subjected to combinations of quasi-static hoop and longitudinal loads. Damage progression and location were characterized with various inspection techniques, and the acoustic emission results were correlated with photogrammetric strain fields. Applying post-test signal processing, acoustic emission accurately detected notch tip damage initiation and tracked its progression to ultimate failure.
Tomblin JS, Raju KS, Liew J, et al. Impact damage characterization and damage tolerance of composite sandwich airframe structures. DOT/FAA/AR-00/44, 2001.
2.
Tomblin JS, Raju KS, Acosta JF, et al. Impact damage characterization and damage tolerance of composite sandwich airframe structures – Phase II. DOT/FAA/AR-02/80, 2002.
3.
Shyprykevich P, Tomblin JS, Ilcewicz L, et al. Guidelines for the analysis, testing, and nondestructive inspection of impact-damaged composite sandwich structures. DOT/FAA/AR-02/121, 2003.
4.
Awerbuch J, Leone FA and Ozevin D. On the applicability of acoustic emission to identify modes of damage in full-scale sandwich composite fuselage panels (submitted for publication).
5.
Miller RK, Hill, EvK and Moore PO. Nondestructive testing handbook, Volume 6, Acoustic emission testing. 3rd edn. Columbus, OH: ASNT, 2005.
StephensRWPollockAA. Waveforms and frequency spectra of acoustic emission. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1971; 50(3): 904–910.
8.
GrootPJWijnenPAMJanssenRBF. Real-time frequency determination of acoustic emission for different fracture mechanisms in carbon-epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol1995; 55: 405–412.
9.
Awerbuch J and Ghaffari S. Monitoring progression of matrix splitting during fatigue loading through acoustic emission in notched graphite/epoxy composites. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Acoustic Emission from Reinforced Composites, The Society of the Plastic Industry, Inc., Montreal, Canada, 1986, pp.51–58.
10.
Eckles WW and Awerbuch J. Monitoring acoustic emission in cross-ply graphite/epoxy laminates during fatigue loading. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Acoustic Emission from Reinforced Composites, The Society of the Plastic Industry, Inc., Montreal, Canada, 1986, pp.78–84.
11.
Awerbuch J and Ghaffari S. Effect of friction emission on monitoring damage in composite laminates through acoustic emission. In: Progress in Acoustic Emission III, The Japanese Society of NDI, 1986, pp.638–652.
12.
Awerbuch J and Ghaffari S. Tracking progression of matrix splitting during static loading through acoustic emission in notched unidirectional graphite/epoxy composites. In: Progress in Acoustic Emission III, The Japanese Society of NDI, pp.575–585.
13.
CoverlyPTStaszewskiWJ. Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure. Smart Mater Struct2003; 12: 795–803.
14.
HamstadMAThirty years of advances and some remaining challenges in the application of acoustic emission to composite materials. In: KishiTOhtsuMYuyamaS (eds). Acoustic emission – beyond the millennium, Oxford: Elsevier, 2000, pp. 77–91.
15.
TakemotoMNishinoHOnoKWavelet transform - applications to AE signal analysis. In: KishiTOhtsuMYuyamaS (eds). Acoustic Emission – Beyond the Millennium, Oxford: Elsevier, 2000, pp. 35–56.
16.
GaulLHurlebausS. Identification of the impact location on a plate using wavelets. Mech Syst Sig Process1997; 12(6): 783–795.
17.
JingpinJBinWCunfuH. Acoustic emission source location methods using mode and frequency analysis. Struct Contr Health Monitor2008; 15: 642–651.
18.
Prosser WH and Gorman MR. Accurate simulation of acoustic emission in composite plates. In: ASNT Spring Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1994.
19.
SurgeonMWeversM. Modal analysis of acoustic emission signals from CFRP laminates. NDT&E Int1999; 32: 311–322.
20.
GangadharanRPrasannaGBhatMR. Acoustic emission source location in composite structure by Voronoi construction using geodesic curve evolution. J Acoust Soc Am2009; 126(5): 2324–2330.
21.
KunduTDasSMartinSA. Locating point of impact in anisotropic fiber reinforced composite plates. Ultrasonics2008; 48: 193–201.
22.
CiampaFMeoM. A new algorithm for acoustic emission localization and flexural group velocity determination in anisotropic structures. Composites: Part A2010; 41: 1777–1786.
23.
Kundu T, Das S and Jata KV. An improved technique for locating the point of impact from acoustic emission data. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, vol. 6532.
24.
KunduTDasS. Point of impact prediction in isotropic and anisotropic plates from acoustic emission data. J Acoust Soc Am2007; 122(4): 2057–2066.
25.
KunduTDasSJataKV. Point of impact prediction in anisotropic fiber reinforced composite plates from acoustic emission data fiber. Rev Progr Quant NDE2008; 27: 1405–1412.
26.
Bakuckas JG. Full-scale testing and analysis of fuselage structure containing multiple cracks. DOT/FAA/AR-01/46, 2002.
27.
Leone FA. Full-scale testing and progressive damage modeling of sandwich composite aircraft fuselage structure. Doctoral Dissertation, Drexel University, 2010.
28.
Raju KS and Tomblin JS. Damage tolerance evaluation of sandwich composite fuselage panels. DOT/FAA/AR-09/09, 2009.
29.
HsuDKBarnardDJPetersJJ. Physical basis of tap test as a quantitative imaging tool for composite structures on aircraft. Rev Progr Quant NDE2000; 19B: 1857–1864.
30.
BarreSBenzeggaghML. On the use of acoustic emission to investigate damage mechanisms in glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene. Compos Sci Technol1994; 52(3): 369–376.
31.
KimS-TLeeY-T. Characterization of damage and fracture process of carbon fiber reinforced plastic under loading-unloading test by using acoustic emission. Mater Sci Eng A1997; 234-236: 322–326.
