As a part of the Second World-Wide Failure Exercise, a three-dimensional nonlinear maximum progressive strain model, based on laminate analysis, is employed to make blind predictions for 12 test cases representing failure envelopes and stress strain curves for isotropic, unidirectional, and multidirectional composite laminates. This approach allows for redistribution of ply stresses and differentiation of the various potential modes of failure. These cases include initial and final ply failure envelopes under tri-axial loading, as well as 3 cases, requiring nonlinear stress–strain analysis. Comparison of predictions with actual experimental data will be made in Part B of the Second World-Wide Failure Exercise.
ChamisCC. Failure criteria for filamentary composites. Testing and design. ASTM STP 490. West Conshohocken: ASTM, 1996, pp. 336–460.
2.
Sandhu RS. A survey of failure theories of isotropic and anisotropic materials. AFFDL-TR-72-71, AD756889, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA, 1972.
3.
SoniSR. A comparative study of failure envelopes in composite laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos1983; 2: 34–42.
4.
TsaiSW. A survey of macroscopic failure criteria for composite materials. J Reinf Plast Compos1984; 3: 40–62.
5.
NahasMN. Survey of failure and post failure theories of laminated fibre reinforced composites. J Compos Technol Res1986; 8: 138–153.
6.
HintonMJSodenPD. Predicting failure in composite laminates: background to the exercise. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1001–1010.
7.
SodenPDHintonMJKaddourAS. Lamina properties, lay-up configurations, and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1011–1022.
8.
SodenPDHintonMJKaddourAS. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1225–1254.
9.
HintonMJKaddourASSodenPD. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(12–13): 1725–1797.
10.
KaddourASHintonMJSodenPD. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 449–476.
11.
HintonMJKaddourASSodenPD. A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 549–588.
12.
SodenPDKaddourASHintonMJ. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the World-Wide Failure Exercise. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 589–604.
Bogetti TA, Hoppel CPR and Drysdale WH. Three-dimensional effective property and strength prediction of thick laminated composite media. ARL-TR-911, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, October 1995.
KaddourASHintonMJSmithPA. A comparison between predictive capability of various damage models employed in the WWFE-III. J Compos Mater2012(to be published.
26.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Stiffness and fracture analysis of laminated composites with off-axis ply matrix cracking. Compos Part A2007; 38(4): 1262–1269.
27.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Stiffness degradation in cross-ply laminates damaged by transverse cracking and splitting. Compos Part A2000; 31(4): 335–351.
28.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. The effect of delaminations induced by transverse cracking and splitting on stiffness properties of composite laminates. Compos Part A2000; 31(2): 107–119.
29.
SoutisCTurkmenD. Moisture and temperature effects on the compressive failure of CFRP unidirectional laminates. J Compos Mater1997; 31(8): 832–849.
30.
Kaddour AS and Hinton MJ. Input data for test cases used in benchmarking triaxial failure theories of composites, 2012. J Compos Mater 2012; 46: 2295–2312.
31.
Kaddour AS and Hinton MJ. Benchmarking of triaxial failure criteria for composite laminates: comparison between models of ‘Part (A)’ of ‘WWFE-II’, 2012. J Compos Mater 2012; 46: 2595–2634.
32.
BogettiTAStaniszewskiJBurnsBP. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates under triaxial loading: correlation with experimental results. J Compos Mater2012(to be published.
33.
Bogetti TA, Hoppel CPR and Burns BP. LAMPAT: A software tool for the analysis and design of thick laminated composite structures. U.S. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report, ARL-TR-890, September 1995.
