Multi-wall carbon nanotubes of medium length (mCNTs) were aggressively tip-ultrasonicated to produce shortened and damaged carbon nanotubes (xCNTs). High-resolution electron microscopic analysis was performed to measure the dimensions of carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Thermo-gravimetric analysis and Raman spectroscopy were used to evaluate the damage in the sonicated CNTs. Short CNTs (sCNTs), in their pristine form (undamaged), were used for comparison with sonicated xCNTs. Good dispersion was achieved when CNTs were bath-ultrasonicated in epoxy resin. The electrical conductivities were measured for cured CNT/epoxy nanocomposites. Compared to shorter CNTs (xCNT and sCNT), mCNT lowered the percolation threshold of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites for electrical conductivity. While ultrasonically shortened xCNTs did give a percolation threshold similar to that of sCNT/epoxy nanocomposites, lower ultimate electrical conductivities were obtained for nanocomposites based on xCNTs due to the presence of structural defects.
IijimaS. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature1992; 354: 56–58.
2.
DengHZhangRReynoldsCTBilottiEPeijsT. A novel concept for highly oriented carbon nanotube composite tapes or fibres with high strength and electrical conductivity. Macromol Mater Eng2009; 294: 749–755.
3.
WangZCiselliPPeijsT. The extraordinary reinforcing efficiency of single-walled carbon nanotubes in oriented poly(vinyl alcohol) tapes. Nanotechnology2007; 18: 455709–455709.
4.
InamFWongDYWKuwataMPeijsT. Multiscale hybrid micro-nanocomposites based on carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers. J Nanomater2010; 2010: 453420–453420.
5.
CelzardAMcRaeEDeleuzeCDufortMFurdinGMarêchêJF. Critical concentration in percolating systems containing a high-aspect-ratio filler. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter1996; 53: 6209–6214.
6.
BaiJBAllaouiA. Effect of the length and the aggregate size of MWNTs on the improvement efficiency of the mechanical and electrical properties of nanocomposites-experimental investigation. Composites Part A2003; 34: 689–694.
7.
MartinCASandlerJKWShafferMSPSchwarzMKBauhoferWSchulteK. Formation of percolating networks in multi-wall carbon-nanotube–epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 2309–2316.
8.
DuFMFischerJEWineyKI. Effect of nanotube alignment on percolation conductivity in carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter2005; 72: 121404–121404.
9.
ZhangRDowdenADengHBaxendaleMPeijsT. Conductive network formation in the melt of carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane composite. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1499–1504.
GrossiordNLoosJLaakeLVMaugeyMZakriCKoningCE. High-conductivity polymer nanocomposites obtained by tailoring the characteristics of carbon nanotube fillers. Adv Funct Mater2008; 18: 3226–3234.
12.
KyrylyukAVSchootPVD. Continuum percolation of carbon nanotubes in polymeric and colloidal media. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA2008; 105: 8221–8226.
13.
BauhoferWKovacsJZ. A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1486–1498.
14.
SandlerJShafferMSPPrasseTBauhoferWSchulteKWindleAH. Development of a dispersion process for carbon nanotubes in an epoxy matrix and the resulting electrical properties. Polymer1999; 40: 5967–5971.
15.
StaufferDAharonyA. Introduction to percolation theory19854th edLondonTaylor & Francis.
BryningMBIslamMFKikkawaJMYodhAG. Very low conductivity threshold in bulk isotropic single-walled carbon nanotube-epoxy composites. Adv Mater2005; 17: 1186–1191.
18.
KovacsJZVelagalaBSSchulteKBauhoferW. Two percolation thresholds in carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 922–928.
19.
WuXQiSHeJDuanG. High conductivity and low percolation threshold in polyaniline/graphite nanosheets composites. J Mater Sci2010; 45: 483–489.
20.
DalmasFDendievelRChazeauaLCavailléJYGauthierC. Carbon nanotube-filled polymer composites. Numerical simulation of electrical conductivity in three-dimensional entangled fibrous network. Acta Mater2006; 54: 2923–2931.
21.
LiangGDTjongSC. Electrical properties of percolative polystyrene/ carbon nanofiber composites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul2008; 15: 214–220.
22.
InamFPeijsT. Transmission light microscopy of carbon nanotubes-epoxy nanocomposites involving different dispersion methods. Adv Compos Lett2006; 15: 7–13.
23.
RahatekarSSKoziolKKKButlerSAElliottJAShafferMSPMackleyMR. Optical microstructure and viscosity enhancement for an epoxy resin matrix containing multiwall carbon nanotubes. J Rheol2006; 50: 599–610.
24.
RahatekarSSKoziolKKKlineSRHobbieEKGilmanJWWindleAH. Length-dependent mechanics of carbon-nanotube networks. Adv Mater2009; 21: 874–878.
25.
LisunovaMOLebovkaNIMelezhykOVBoikoYP. Stability of the aqueous suspensions of nanotubes in the presence of nonionic surfactant. J Colloid Interface Sci2006; 299: 740–746.
26.
HildingJGrulkeEAZhangEALockwoodF. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in liquids. J Dispersion Sci Technol2003; 24: 1–41.
27.
LuKLLagoRMChenYKGreenMLHHarrisPJFTsangSC. Mechanical damage of carbon nanotubes by ultrasound. Carbon1996; 34: 814–816.
28.
LeeKCYuHHHwangSJLiYSChengMHLinCC. Preparation and characterization of modified carbon nanotubes enhanced epoxy resin composites. Mater Sci Forum2006; 505–507: 1075–1080.
29.
OsswaldSHavelMGogotsiY. Monitoring oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc2007; 38: 728–736.
30.
JiangDThomsonKKuntzJDAgerbJWMukherjeeAK. Effect of sintering temperature on a single-wall carbon nanotube-toughened alumina-based nanocomposites. Scr Mater2007; 56: 959–962.
TuinstraFKoenigJL. Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys1970; 53: 1126–1130.
33.
GromovADittmerSSvenssonJNerushevOAGarciaSAPJimenezLL. Covalent amino-functionalisation of single-wall carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem2005; 15: 3334–3339.
34.
DelhaesPCouziMTrinquecosteMDentzerJHamidouHGuterlCV. A comparison between Raman spectroscopy and surface characterizations of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon2006; 44: 3005–3013.
35.
ParkCOunaiesZWatsonKACrooksRESmithJLowtherSE. Dispersion of single wall carbon nanotubes by in situ polymerization under sonication. Chem Phys Lett2002; 364: 303–308.
36.
InamFPeijsT. Re -aggregation of carbon nanotubes in two-component epoxy system. J Nanostruct Polym Nanocompos2006; 2: 87–95.
37.
KaatzFHSiegalMPOvermyerDLProvencioPPJacksonJL. Diameter control and emission properties of carbon nanotubes grown using chemical vapor deposition. Mater Sci Eng C2003; 23: 141–146.
38.
ChengQWangJJiangKLiQFanS. Fabrication and properties of aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy composite. J Mater Res2008; 23: 2975–2983.
GojnyFHWichmannMHGFiedlerBKinlochIABauhoferWWindleAH. Evaluation and identification of electrical and thermal conduction mechanisms in carbon nanotube/ epoxy composites. Polymer2006; 47: 2036–2045.
41.
AllaouiABaiSChengHMBaiJB. Mechanical and electrical properties of a MWNT/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1993–1998.
42.
LiJMaPCChowWSToCKTangBZKimJK. Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater2007; 17: 3207–3215.
43.
HuNMasudaZFukunagaH. Prediction of electrical properties of CNT/polymer composites. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Composite Materials2007; Vol. 1Kyoto, JapanJuly 8–13.
44.
KimBLeeJYuI. Electrical properties of single-wall carbon nanotube and epoxy composites. J Appl Phys2003; 94: 6724–6728.
45.
InamFYanHXReeceMJPeijsT. tructural and chemical stability of multiwall carbon nanotubes in sintered ceramic nanocomposite. Adv Appl Ceram2010; 109: 240–245.
