This study presents a multiscale numerical framework designed to predict the nonlinear constitutive behavior of metal-composite interfaces in titanium-graphite fiber metal laminates. Molecular-level property predictions derived in a separate analysis are used to parameterize a finite element model of the interface by means of a traction-separation constitutive law. Additional continuum-level energy dissipation and progressive failure phenomena are implemented into commercial finite element software through a user-defined material subroutine. Results obtained from this multiscale interface model are compared against experimental measurements of titanium-graphite fiber metal laminates in a short-beam shear loading configuration. The model predictive accuracy and its application to other bonded metal-composite systems are subsequently discussed.
GunninkJWVlotAde VriesTJvan der HoevenW. Glare technology development 1997–2000. Appl Compos Mater2002; 9(4): 201–219.
2.
MillerJLProgarDJJohnsonWSSt ClairTL. Preliminary evaluation of hybrid titanium composite laminates. NASA TM-1090951994.
3.
VermeerenCAJRBeumlerTde KanterJLCGvan der JagtOCOutBCL. Glare design aspects and philosophies. Appl Compos Mater2003; 10(4): 257–276.
4.
BernhardtSRamuluMKobayashiAS. Low-velocity impact response characterization of a hybrid titanium composite laminate. J Eng Mater Technol2007; 129(4): 220–226.
5.
SeoHSHundleyJMHahnHTYangJM. Numerical simulation of glass-fiber-reinforced aluminum laminates with diverse impact damage. AIAA J2010; 48(3): 676–687.
6.
GreszczukLB. Stress concentrations and failure criteria for orthotropic and anisotropic plates with circular openings. Composite Materials Testing and Design 2nd Conference1971; Anaheim, CA. 363–381.
7.
HundleyJMHahnHTYangJMFaccianoAB. Three-dimensional progressive failure analysis of bolted titanium-graphite fiber metal laminate joints. J Compos Mater2011; 45(7): 751–769.
8.
KolesnikovBHerbeckLFinkA. CFRP/titanium hybrid material for improving composite bolted joints. Compos Struct2008; 83: 368–380.
9.
van RooijenRGJSinkeJde VriesTJvan der ZwaagS. The bearing strength of fiber metal laminates. J Compos Mater2006; 40(1): 5–19.
10.
LawcockGYeLMaiYWSunCT. The effect of adhesive bonding between aluminum and composite prepreg on the mechanical properties of carbon-fiber-reinforced metal laminates. Compos Sci Technol1997; 57: 35–45.
11.
WuGYangJMHahnHT. The impact properties and damage tolerance of bi-directionally reinforced fiber metal laminates. J Mater Sci2007; 42(3): 948–957.
12.
Dassault Systems Inc. ABAQUS/CAE user’s manual (Version 6.7). Providence, RI, 2008.
13.
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test methods of tension testing of metallic foil (E345), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2005.
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates (D2344), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2008.
20.
UguralACFensterSK. Advanced strength and applied elasticity, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
21.
CuiWCWisnomMR. Contact finite element analysis of three- and four-point short-beam bending of unidirectional composites. Compos Sci Technol1992; 45: 323–334.
22.
XieMAdamsDF. Contact finite element modeling of the short-beam shear test for composite materials. Comput Struct1995; 57(2): 183–191.
23.
AdamsDFLewisEQ. Current status of composite material shear test methods. SAMPE J1994; 31(6): 32–41.
24.
HeJChiangMYMHunstonDL. Assessment of sandwich beam in three-point bending for measuring adhesive shear modulus. J Eng Mater Technol2001; 123: 322–328.
