The inter-ply characteristics of polymeric prepreg composites influence their interlaminar fracture toughness and the overall performance. This article embarks on engineering the inter-ply interfaces of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. A novel and practical technique for dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) onto woven CFRP prepreg is presented. The interlaminar fracture toughness of these CFRP lay-ups was evaluated experimentally and compared with the regular (without any CNTs) specimen. Double cantilever beam and end notch flexure tests were conducted for interlaminar fracture studies. It was observed that the addition of MWCNTs in between the CFRP prepreg plies helps in strengthening the interface. There existed an optimum percentage in which these nanofillers should be added. The presence of nanotubes increased fiber bridging within the ply interfaces, which in turn controlled the inter-ply crack propagation. The findings and the mechanisms are discussed using the test data, SEM pictures, schematics, and scans of the fractured surfaces.
AgrawalABen JarPY. Analysis of specimen thickness effect on interlaminar fracture toughness of fiber composites using finite element models. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63(10): 1393–1402.
2.
KimJ-KMaiY-W. Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced compositesOxford: Elsevier, 1998.
3.
LeeSM. Mode II interlaminar crack growth process in polymer matrix composites. J Reinf Plast Compos1999; 18(13): 1254–1266.
4.
TongLMouritzAPBannisterM. 3D fibre reinforced polymer compositesOxford: Elsevier, 2002.
5.
ChengYKeqinXLinYMaiY-W. Numerical and experimental studies on the fracture behavior of rubber-toughened epoxy in bulk specimen and laminated composites. J Mater Sci2002; 37(5): 921–927.
6.
KobayashiSOgiharaSTakedaN. Experimental characterization of the effects of stacking sequence on the transverse crack behavior in quasi-isotropic interleaved CFRP laminates. Adv Compos Mater: Off J Jpn Soc Compos Mater2000; 9(3): 241–251.
7.
SolaimuruganSVelmuruganR. Influence of in-plane fibre orientation on mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of stitched glass/polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(7–8): 1742–1752.
8.
RatnaD. Modification of epoxy resins for improvement of adhesion: a critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol2003; 17(12): 1655–1668.
9.
UnnikrishnanKPThachilEB. Toughening of epoxy resins. Des Monomers Polym2006; 9(Copyright 2006, The Institution of Engineering and Technology): 129–152.
10.
LuoYXKouC-H. Effect of the interfacial interleaf to the interlaminar fracture and intralaminar fracture of a new BMI matrix composites system. J Reinf Plast Compos1994; 13(6): 509–540.
11.
KageyamaKKimparaIOhsawaIHojoMKabashimaS. Mode I and Mode II delamination growth of interlayer toughened carbon/epoxy (T800H/3900-2) composite systemAtlanta, GA: ASTM, 1995.
12.
JiangWTjongSCChuPKLiRKYKimJKMaiYW. Interlaminar fracture properties of carbon fibre/epoxy matrix composites interleaved with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) films. Polym Polym Compos2001; 9(Compendex): 141–144.
13.
HojoMAndoTTanakaMAdachiTOchiaiSEndoY. Modes I and II interlaminar fracture toughness and fatigue delamination of CF/epoxy laminates with self-same epoxy interleaf. Int J Fatigue2006; 28(Copyright 2006, The Institution of Engineering and Technology): 1154–1165.
14.
KleinPJWarrenGLSagerRJSueHJLagoudasDC. B-staged carbon nanotube/epoxy films for the improvement of interlaminar fracture toughnessCincinnati, OH: Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, 2007.
15.
AraiMNoroYSugimotoKiEndoM. Mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of CFRP laminates toughened by carbon nanofiber interlayer. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(Copyright 2008, The Institution of Engineering and Technology): 516–525.
16.
Warren G, Sun L, Moghbelli E, White K, Davis D, Lagoudas D, et al. (2009). B-staged interleaf-toughened epoxy/SWCNT nanocomposites for VARTM applications. In: SAMPE '09 Spring Symposium Conference Proceedings, 18–21 May, Baltimore, MD, USA, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering.
17.
MouritzAPBannisterMKFalzonPJLeongKH. Review of applications for advanced three-dimensional fibre textile composites. Composites Part A1999; 30(12): 1445–1461.
18.
LeeLRudov-ClarkSMouritzAPBannisterMKHerszbergI. Effect of weaving damage on the tensile properties of three-dimensional woven composites. Compos Struct2002; 57(1–4): 405–413.
19.
MouritzAPCoxBN. A mechanistic interpretation of the comparative in-plane mechanical properties of 3D woven, stitched and pinned composites. Composites Part A2010; 41(6): 709–728.
20.
ThostensonETRenZChouT-W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(13): 1899–1912.
21.
BreuerOSundararajU. Big returns from small fibers: a review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Compos2004; 25(Copyright 2005, IEE): 630–645.
22.
XieX-LMaiY-WZhouX-P. Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: a review. Mater Sci Eng R2005; 49(4): 89–112.
23.
FiedlerBGojnyFHWichmannMHGNolteMCMSchulteK. Fundamental aspects of nano-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(16): 3115–3125.
24.
ColemanJNKhanUBlauWJGun'koYK. Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon2006; 44(9): 1624–1652.
25.
XieGZhouGBaoX. Mechanical behaviour of advanced composite laminates embedded with carbon nanotubes – reviewWeihai: SPIE, 2009.
26.
BoseSKhareRAMoldenaersP. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of various types of pre-treatments of carbon nanotubes on the properties of polymer/carbon nanotubes composites: a critical review. Polymer2010; 51(5): 975–993.
27.
QianHGreenhalghESShafferMSPBismarckA. Carbon nanotube-based hierarchical composites: a review. J Mater Chem2010; 20(23): 4751–4762.
28.
LauK-TShiS-QZhouL-MChengH-M. Micro-hardness and flexural properties of randomly-oriented carbon nanotube composites. J Compos Mater2003; 37(4): 365–376.
29.
GaoXLiuLGuoQShiJZhaiG. Fabrication and mechanical/conductive properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWNT) reinforced carbon matrix composites. Mater Lett2005; 59(24–25): 3062–3065.
30.
TongLSunXTanP. Effect of long multi-walled carbon nanotubes on delamination toughness of laminated composites. J Compos Mater2008; 42(1): 5–23.
31.
KeppleKLSanbornGPLacassePAGruenbergKMReadyWJ. Improved fracture toughness of carbon fiber composite functionalized with multi walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon2008; 46(15): 2026–2033.
32.
MathurRBChatterjeeSSinghBP. Growth of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibre substrates to produce hybrid/phenolic composites with improved mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(7–8): 1608–1615.
33.
VeeduVPCaoALiXMaKSoldanoCKarS. Multifunctional composites using reinforced laminae with carbon-nanotube forests. Nat Mater2006; 5(6): 457–462.
34.
FanZSantareMHAdvaniSG. Interlaminar shear strength of glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites enhanced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Composites Part A2008; 39(3): 540–554.
35.
ThakrePRLagoudasDCZhuJBarreraEVGatesTS. Processing and characterization of epoxy/SWCNT/woven fabric compositesReston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2006.
36.
KarapappasPVavouliotisATsotraPKostopoulosVPaipetisA. Enhanced fracture properties of carbon reinforced composites by the addition of multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Compos Mater2009; 43(9): 977–985.
37.
YokozekiTIwahoriYIshiwataS. Matrix cracking behaviors in carbon fiber/epoxy laminates filled with cup-stacked carbon nanotubes (CSCNTs). Composites Part A2007; 38(3): 917–924.
38.
YokozekiTIwahoriYIshiwataSEnomotoK. Mechanical properties of CFRP laminates manufactured from unidirectional prepregs using CSCNT-dispersed epoxy. Composites Part A2007; 38(10): 2121–2130.
39.
GodaraAMezzoLLuiziFWarrierALomovSVvan VuureAW. Influence of carbon nanotube reinforcement on the processing and the mechanical behaviour of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Carbon2009; 47(12): 2914–2923.
40.
ParisIMinguetPJO'BrienTK. Comparison of delamination characterization for IM7/8552 composite woven and tape laminatesWest Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2003.
41.
ChatterjeeSN. Analysis of test specimens for interlaminar mode II fracture toughness: part 2. Effects of adhesive layers and material nonlinearities. J Compos Mater1991; 25(5): 494–511.
42.
RamkumarRLWhitcombJD. Characterization of mode I and mixed-mode delamination growth in T300/5208 graphite/epoxyPhiladelphia, PA: ASTM, 1985.
43.
Donald, FA, LA Carlsson, and RB Pipes, Characterization of Delamination Failure, in Experimental Characterization of Advanced Composite Materials, Third Edition 2003; CRC Press. p.185–194.
44.
Robinson P, and Hodgkinson JM, Interlaminar fracture toughness, in Mechanical Testing of Advanced Fibre Composites 2000; CRC Press. p.170 206..
45.
TanakaKKageyamaKHojoM. Prestandardization study on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness test for CFRP in Japan. Composites1995; 26(4): 257–267.
46.
ASTM D5528 - 01(2007)e2. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
47.
JSA JIS K 7086 ERTA (R 2008). Testing methods for interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon fibre reinforced plastics. Minato-Ku, Tokyo: Japanese Industrial Standard Group.
