Degradable phosphate glass fiber is a synthetic fiber and silk is one of the strongest natural fibers. In this study, composites are fabricated from PP reinforced with phosphate glass fiber and silk fiber using compression molding. Tensile testing, flexural testing and impact testing are carried out to evaluate the composites mechanical properties. It has been found that silk fiber composites provided higher tensile strength (46 MPa), bending strength (50 MPa), and impact strength (17 kJ/m2) compared to glass fiber composites which are respectively 39 MPa, 46 MPa, and 8 kJ/m2. Degradation studies are carried out by accelerated weathering as well as by natural weathering. After weathering, the mechanical properties are evaluated and it has been found that phosphate glass fiber/PP composites degrade more rapidly compared to silk/PP composites.
Li Y., Mai YW and Ye L.Sisal fibre and its composites: a review of recent developments. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 2037-2055.
2.
Hill CAS and Abdul Khalil HPS.Effect of fibre treatments on mechanical properties of coir or oil palm fiber reinforced polyester composites. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 78: 1685-1697.
3.
Varada RA, Babu RG and Ganga DLTensile properties of natural fabric Hildegardia Populifolia/polycarbonate toughened epoxy composites. J Polym Compos2004; 25: 563-568.
4.
Rodriguz E., Petrucci R., Puglia D., Jose KMK and Vazauez A.Characterization of composites based on natural and glass fibers obtained by vacuum infusion. J Compos Mater2005; 39: 265-282.
5.
Han SO, Lee SM, Park WH and Cho D.Mechanical and thermal properties of waste silk fiber reinforced poly(butylenes succinate) bio composites. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 100: 4972-4980.
6.
Mohanty S., Sushil VK, Sanjay NK, Sudhansu S. and Tripathy S.Influence of fiber treatment on the performance of sisal polypropylene composites . J Appl Polym Sci2004; 94: 1336-1345.
7.
Vollrath F.Biology of spider silk. Int J Biol Macromol1999; 24: 81-88.
8.
Craig CL and Riekel C.Comparative architecture of silks, fibrous proteins and their encoding genes in insects and spiders. Comp Biochem Physiol Biochem Mol Biol2002; 133: 493-507.
9.
Gosline JM, Denny MW and DeMont MESpider silk as rubber. Nature1984 ; 309: 551-552.
10.
Gosline JM, DeMont ME and Denny MWThe structure and properties of spider silk. Endeavour1986; 10: 37-43.
11.
Cunniff PM, Fossey SA, Auerbach MA, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of dragline silk from the spider Nephila clavipes. Polym Adv Technol1994; 5: 401-410.
12.
Perez-Rigueiro J., Viney C., Llorca J. and Elices M.Mechanical properties of single-brin silkworm silk. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 75: 1270-1277.
13.
Cheung H-Y. , Lau K-T., Tao X-M. and Hui D.A potential material for tissue engineering: Silkworm silk/PLA bio-composite. Composites: Part B2008; 39: 1026-1033.
14.
Priya SP, Ramakrishna HV and Rai SKTensile, Fexural, and chemical resistance properties of waste silk fabric-reinforced epoxy laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos2005 ; 24: 643-648.
15.
Ahmed I., Parsons AJ, Palmer G., Knowles JC, Walker GS and Rudd CDWeight loss, ion release and initial mechanical properties of a binary calcium phosphate glass fibre/PCL composite. Acta Biomater2008; 4: 1307-1314.
16.
Mondrinos MJ , Dembzynski R., Lu L., Byrapogu VKC, et al. Porogen-based solid freeform fabrication of polycaprolactone-calcium phosphate scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials2006; 27: 4399-4408.
17.
Lin ST, Krebs SL, Kadiyala S., Leong KW and Kumar B.Development of bioabsorpable glass fibers. Biomaterials1994; 15: 1057-1061.
18.
Jiang G., Evans ME, Jones IA, Rudd CD, Scotchford CA and Walker GSPreparation of poly(‘‘-caprolactone)/ continuous bioglass fiber composite using monomer transfer moulding for bone implant. Biomaterials2005; 26: 2281-2288.
19.
Mubarak AK, Ruhul AK, Haydaruzzaman SG, Siddiky MNA and Saha M.Study on the physico-mechanical properties of starch-treated jute yarn-reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of Gamma radiation. Polym Plast Technol Eng2009; 48: 542-548.
20.
Goldberg RK and Stuffer DCStrain rate dependent analysis of a polymer matrix composite utilizing a micromechanics approach. J Compos Mater2002; 36(7): 773-793.
21.
Ruhul AK, Mubarak AK, Haydar UZ, Shamim P., Nuruzzaman K., Sabrina S., et al. Comparative studies of mechanical and interfacial properties between jute and E-glass fibers reinforced polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2010; 29(7): 1078-1088.
22.
Bunker BC, Arnold GW and Wilder JAPhosphate glass dissolution in aqueous solutions. J Non-Crystal Solids1984; 64: 291-316.
23.
Beg MDH and Pickering KLMechanical performance of kraft fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: influence of fibre length, fibre beating and hygrothermal ageing. Composites Part A2008; 39: 1748-1755.
24.
Davis A. and Sims D.Weathering of Polymers. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1983.
25.
Kiyoshi H., Yoshikuni Y., Shotaro K., Kenji O. and Weijin H.Degradation of silk fibroin. J Sericult Sci Jpn1987; 56: 18-22.
26.
Lee SM, Cho D., Park WH, Lee SG, Han SO and Drzal LTNovel silk/poly(butylene succinate) biocomposites: the effect of short fibre content on their mechanical and thermal properties. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 647-657.
27.
Ahmed I., Collins CA, Lewis MP, Oslen I. and Knowles JCProcessing, characterisation and biocompatibility of iron-phosphate glass fibers for tissue engineering. Biomaterials2004; 25: 3223-3232.
28.
Ruhul AK, Mubarak AK, Sabrina S., Nuruzzaman MK, Shubhra QTH and Farhana GNMechanical, degradation, and interfacial properties of synthetic degradable fiber reinforced polypropylene composite. J Reinf Plast Compos2010; 29: 466-476.
