The cutting tool geometry plays a significant role on the performance of conventional machining operations, irrespectively of the work material. For instance, alterations in the cutting edge preparation will result in changes in tool wear rate, cutting forces, temperature, and machined surface finish. This article compares the performance of uncoated carbide tools with standard cutting geometry and tools with modified edge preparation during precision turning of polyamide with and without 30% glass fiber reinforcing. The results indicated that, in general, the turning force components are reduced with the tool nose radius and the specific cutting force (Ks ) decreased as feed rate is elevated, presenting values comparable to metallic alloys. In addition to that, the polyamide without reinforcing presented a three-fold increase in specific cutting force (Ks) compared with the reinforced composite. Finally, the surface roughness increased as feed rate is elevated and tool nose radius is reduced.
Lo, H.W. , Kaldor, S. and Venuvinod, P.K. (1998). A Broad-brush Approach to the Selection of General Purpose Cutting Tool Geometry for Maximum Tool Life, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 38(1-2): 1-14.
2.
Shaffer, W. ( 1999). Cutting Tool Edge Preparation, In: Proceedings of the Third International Machining and Grinding Conference, October, pp. 799-808.
3.
Thiele, J.D. and Melkote, S.N. ( 1999). The Effect of Tool Edge Geometry on Workpiece Subsurface Deformation and Through-thickness Residual Stresses for Hard-turning of AISI 52100 steel, Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), Technical Paper, MR99-167, 1-6 May.
4.
Sikdar, C., Paul, S. and Chattopadhyay, A. ( 1992). Effect of Variation in Edge Geometry on Wear and Life of Coated Carbide Face Milling Inserts, Wear, 157: 111-116.
5.
Yen, Y.C. , Jain, A. and Altan, T. (2004). A Finite Element Analysis of Orthogonal Machining Using Different Tool Edge Geometries, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146: 72-81.
6.
Shintani, K. , Ueki, M. and Fujimura, Y. (1989). Optimum Tool Geometry of CBN Tool for Continuous Turning of Carburized Steel , International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 29(3): 403-413.
7.
Coelho, R.T. , Silva, L., Braghini , A. and Bezerra, A.A. (2004). Some Effects of Cutting Edge Preparation and Geometric Modifications when Turning INCONEL 718TM at High Cutting Speeds, Journal of Materials Processing Technology , 148: 147-153.
8.
Fang, F.Z. and Liu, Y.C. ( 2004). On Minimum Exit-burr in Micro Cutting, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 14: 984-988.
9.
Azizur Rahman, M., Rahman, M., Senthil Kumar, A. and Lim , H.S. (2005). CNC Microturning: An Application to Miniaturization, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 45: 631-639.
10.
Fang, F.Z., Wu, H., Liu, X.D., Liu, Y.C. and Ng, S.T. ( 2003). Tool Geometry Study in Micromachining, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 13: 726-731.
11.
Chae, J. and Park, S.S. ( 2007). High Frequency Bandwidth Measurements of Micro Cutting Forces, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 47: 1441-1443.
12.
Dornfeld, D. , Min, S. and Takeuchi, Y. (2006). Recent Advances in Mechanical Micromachining, Annals of the CIRP, 55(2): 745-768.
13.
Kang, I.S., Kim, J.S., Kim, J.H., Kang, M.C. and Seo, Y.W. ( 2007). A Mechanistic Model of Cutting Force in the Micro End Milling Process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology , 187-188: 250-255.
14.
Kim, K.W. , Lee, W.Y. and Sin , H. (1999). A Finite Element Analysis for the Characteristics of Temperature and Stress in Micro-machining Considering the Size Effect, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 39: 1507-1524.
15.
Yuan, Z.J., Zhou, M. and Dong, S. ( 1996). Effect of Diamond Tool Sharpness on Minimum Cutting Thickness and Cutting Surface Integrity in Ultraprecision Machining, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 62: 327-330.
16.
Gopala, G.V. , Mahajan, P. and Bhatnagar, N. ( 2007). Micro-mechanical Modeling of Machining of FRP Composites - Cutting Force Analysis, Composites Science and Technology , 67: 579-593.
17.
Sonbaty, E. , Khashaba, U. and Machaly, T. ( 2004). Factors Affecting the Machinability of GFR/Epoxy Composites , Composite Structures , 63: 329-338.
18.
Apichartpattanasiri, S., Hay , J.N. and Kukureka, S.N. (2001). A Study of the Tribological Behaviour of Polyamide 66 with Varying Injection-moulding Parameters, Wear, 251: 1557-1566.
19.
Wang, X.M. and Zhang, L.C. ( 2003). An Experimental Investigation into the Orthogonal Cutting of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Plastics, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43: 1015-1022.
20.
Sang-Ook, A. , Eun-Sang, L. and Sang-Lai, N. ( 1997). A Study on the Cutting Characteristics of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics with Respect to Tool Materials and Geometries, Journal of Materials Processing Technology , 68: 60-67.
21.
Rahman, M., Ramakrishna, S., Prakash, J.R. and Tan, D.C. ( 1999). Machinability Study of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite , Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 89-90: 292-297.
22.
Abrão, A.M., Faria, P.E., Campos Rubio , J.C., Reis, P. and Davim, J.P. ( 2007). Drilling of Fiber Reinforced Plastics: A Review, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 186: 1-7.
23.
Davim, J.P. and Reis, P. (2004). Machinability Study on Composite (Polyetheretherketone Reinforced with 30% of Glass Fiber-PEEK GF30) Using Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) and Cemented Carbide (K20) Tools , International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 23: 412-418.
24.
Mata, F., Reis, P. and Davim, J.P. ( 2006). Physical Cutting Model of Polyamide Composites (PA66 GF30), Material Science Forum, 514-516: 643-647.
25.
Davim, J.P. and Mata, F.A Comparative Evaluation of the Turning of Reinforced and Unreinforced Polyamide, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (in press).
