Further implications of a fatigue model based on the cycle-by-cycle probability of failure are presented. A model for the residual strength is developed based on a linear relation between the residual strength at any cycle level and its derivative. This model is shown to be in excellent agreement with published test results. The model is also shown to lead to a constant cycle-by-cycle probability of failure under constant amplitude loading thus verifying the assumption of constant probability of failure made previously. The model is then used to construct constant life (Goodman) diagrams for composite structures and its predictions are compared to published test results. The model follows the test data well but needs further improvement for negative R values. The approach is then extended to the determination of the truncation level required for a structure to meet a certain fatigue life. The truncation level is a function of R ratio and the amount of statistical scatter for static tension and compression tests. Using representative values for the scatter, the predicted truncation level of 38% is shown to cover most applications. Possible reasons for discrepancies and areas where more work is needed are identified.
Kassapoglou, C. (2007). Fatigue Life Prediction of Composite Structures Under Constant Amplitude Loading, Journal of Composite Materials, 41: 2737-2754.
2.
Nicholas, T. and Zuiker, J.R. (1996). On the Use of the Goodman Diagram for High Cycle Fatigue Design, International Journal of Fracture, 80: 219-235.
3.
Whitehead, R.S., Kan, H.P., Cordero, R. and Saether, E.S. ( 1986). Certification Testing Methodology for Composite Structures, Task I, Report No NADC-87042-60 (Vol I) and DOT/ FAA/CT-86/39.
4.
Whitehead, R.S., Kan, H.P., Cordero, R. and Saether, E.S. ( 1986). Certification Testing Methodology for Composite Structures, Task II, Report No NADC-87042-60 (Vol II) and DOT/FAA/CT-86/39.
5.
Phillips, E.P. (1979). Effects of Truncation of a Predominantly Compression Load Spectrum on the Life of a Notched Graphite/Epoxy Laminate, NASA Technical Memorandum80114.
6.
Clark, G. and Van Blaricum, T.J. ( 1987). Load Spectrum Modification Effects on Fatigue of Impact-damaged Carbon Fibre Composite Coupons, Composites, 18(3): 243-251.
7.
Nyman, T., Ansell, H. and Blom, A. ( 2000). Effects of Truncation and Elimination on Composite Fatigue Life, Composite Structures, 48: 275-286.
8.
Pavia, E.G. and O’Brien, J.J. ( 1986). Weibull Statistics of Wind Speed Over the Ocean, Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 25: 324-332.
9.
Wedel-Heinen, J., Tadich, J.K., Brokopf, C., Janssen, L.G.J., van Wingerde, A.M., van Delft, D.R.V., Kensche, C.W., Philippidis, T.P., Bronsted, P., Dutton, A.G. and Nijssen, R.P.L. ( 2006). Optimat Blades - Reliable Optimal Use of Materials for Wind Turbine Rotor Blades, Report OB_TG6_R002, chapter 13.2.
10.
Yang, J.N. and Jones, D.L. ( 1983). Load Sequence Effects on Graphite/Epoxy [+-35]2s Laminates Long-term Behavior of Composites. In: O’Brien, T.K. (ed.), ASTM STP813, pp. 246-262, ASTM, Philadelphia PA.
11.
Hahn, H.T. and Kim, R.Y. ( 1975). Proof Testing of Composite Materials, Journal of Composite Materials, 9: 297-311.
12.
Sheikh, A.K. , Ahmed, M. and Badar, M.A. (1995). Fatigue Life Prediction of Assemblies of Rotating Parts, International Journal of Fatigue, 17: 35-41.
13.
Schaff, J.R. and Davidson, B.D. (1997). Life Prediction Methodology for Composite Structures. Part II - Spectrum Fatigue, Journal of Composite Materials, 31: 158-181.
14.
Gerharz, J.J. , Rott, D. and Schuetz, D. (1979). Schwingfestikeitsuntersuchungen an ungekerbten und gekerbten Faserverbundwerkstoffproben aus multidirektionalem Laminat, Report No BMVg-FBWT 79-22, Laboratorium fuer Betriebsfestigkeit , Darmstadt Germany.
15.
Gathercole, N., Reiter, H., Adam, T. and Harris, B. (1994). Life Prediction for Fatigue of T800/ 5245 Carbon-fibre Composites: I Constant-amplitude Loading, Fatigue, 16: 523-532.
16.
Ramkumar, R.L. (1982). Compression Fatigue Behavior of Composites in the Presence of Delaminations, pp. 184-210, ASTM , Philadelphia, PA.
17.
Badaliance, R. and Dill, H.D. (1982). Damage Mechanisms and Life Prediction of Graphite/ Epoxy Composites. In: Reifsnider, K.L. (ed.), Damage in Composite Materials ASTM STP775, pp. 229-242, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
18.
Charewicz, A. and Daniel, I.M. (1986). Damage Mechanisms and Accumulation in Graphite/ Epoxy Laminates, In: Hahn, H.T. (ed.), Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP907, pp. 274-297, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
19.
Bakis, C.E. and Stinchcomb, W.W. (1986). Response of Thick Notched Laminates Subjected to Tension-compression Cyclic Loads. In: Hahn, H.T. (ed.), Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP907, pp. 314-334, ASTM , Philadelphia, PA.
20.
Ramkumar, R.L. (1983). Effect of Low-velocity Impact Damage on the Fatigue Behavior of Graphite/Epoxy Laminates. In: O’Brien, T.K. (ed.), Long-term Behavior of Composites ASTM STP813, pp. 116-135, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
21.
Simonds, R.A. , Bakis, C.E. and Stinchcomb , W.W. (1989). Effects of Matrix Toughness on Fatigue Response of Graphite Fiber Composite Laminates. In: Lagace, P.A. (ed.), Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, Vol. 2, pp. 5-18, ASTM STP1012, ASTM, Philadelphia.
22.
Lee, J.W. , Daniel, I.M. and Yaniv, G. (1989). Fatigue Life Prediction of Cross-ply Composite Laminates. In: Lagace, P.A. (ed.), Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture ASTM STP 1012, Vol. 2, pp. 19-28, ASTM , Philadelphia, PA.
23.
Mahinfalah, M. and Skordahl, R.A. (1998). The Effects of Hail Damage on the Fatigue Strength of a Graphite/Epoxy Composite Laminate, Composite Structures, 42: 101-106.
24.
Hahn, H.T. ( 1979). Fatigue Behavior and Life Prediction of Composite Laminates . In: Tsai, S.W. (ed.), Composite Materials: Testing and Design ASTM STP674, pp. 383-417, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM.
25.
Ramani, S.V. and Williams, D.P. ( 1977). Notched and Unnotched Fatigue Behavior of Angle Ply Graphite/Epoxy Composites. In: Reifsnider, K.L. and Lauraitis, K.N. (eds), Fatigue of Filamentary Composite Materials, ASTM STP636, pp. 27-46, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM.
26.
Shimokawa, T. and Hamaguchi, Y. (1983). Distributions of Fatigue Life and Fatigue Strength in Notched Specimens of a Carbon Eight Harness Satin Laminate, Journal of Composite Materials, 17: 64-76.
27.
Beheshty, M.H. and Harris, B. (1998). A Constant-life Model of Fatigue Behavior for Carbon-fibre Composites: The Effect of Impact Damage , Composites Science and Technology, 58: 9-18.
28.
Philippidis, T.P. and Vassilopoulos , A.P. (1999). Fatigue Strength Prediction under Multiaxial Stress, Journal of Composite Materials, 33(17): 1578-1599.
29.
Shah, C.H., Kan, H.P. and Mahler, M. ( 1996). Certification Methodology for Stiffener Terminations , DOT/FAA/AR-95-10.
30.
Cvitkovich, M.K., O’Brien , T.K. and Minguet, P.J. (1998). Fatigue Debonding Characterization in Composite Skin/Stringer Configurations . In: Bucinell, R.B. (ed.), Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP1330, Vol. 7, pp. 97-121, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM.
31.
Maier, G., Ott, H., Protzner, A. and Protz, B. ( 1986). Damage Development in Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polyimides in Fatigue Loading as a Function of Stress Ratio, Composites , 17(2): 111-120.
32.
O’Brien, T.K. (1988). Fatigue Delamination Behavior of PEEK Thermoplastic Composite Laminates, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 7: 341-359.
33.
Gerharz, J.J. , Rott, D. and Schuetz, D. (1979). Schwingfestigkeitsuntersuchungen an Fuegungen in Faserbauweise, Report no BMVg-FBWT 79-23, Laboratorium fuer Betriebsfestigkeit, Darmstadt Germany.
34.
Department of Defence ( 2002). Composite Materials Handbook, Volume 3, Polymer Matrix Composites, Materials Usage, Design and Analysis , MIL-HDBK-17-3F.
