In this article we derive, implement, and verify equations to compute the sensitivity of responses from numerical simulation of composites manufacturing. The responses considered are part temperature and degree of cure, as well as process-induced deformation of the cured part. The `direct differentiation method' (DDM) is used, which entails a one-time investment of effort to differentiate the governing response equations analytically. The implementation of the derivative equations facilitates efficient and accurate computation of response sensitivities in all subsequent analyses. This article extends the DDM methodology developed earlier for mechanical problems. Novel `shape sensitivity' equations and efficient implementation techniques are also included. In order to verify the implementations, the model predictions are compared with those obtained from the less efficient finite difference approach. A comprehensive example is presented where the usefulness and interpretation of response sensitivities are emphasized. It is observed that the responses are particularly sensitive to certain model parameters, for which further data gathering and model improvement efforts should be focused.
Choi, K.K. and Santos, J.L.T. (1987). Design Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Structural Systems, Part 1: Theory, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 24: 2039-2055.
2.
Tsay, J.J. and Arora, J.S. (1990). Nonlinear Structural Design Sensitivity Analysis for Path Dependent Problems, Part 1: General Theory, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 81: 183-208.
3.
Liu, P.L. and Der Kiureghian , A. (1991). Optimization Algorithms for Structural Reliability, Structural Safety, 9(3): 161-178.
4.
Roth, C. and Grigoriu, M. (2001). Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Systems Subjected to Seismic Loads, Report No MCEER-01-0003, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
5.
Zhang, Y. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1993). Dynamic Response Sensitivity of Inelastic Structures, Computer Methods in Applied Science and Engineering, 108: 23-36.
6.
Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, T. and Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK.
7.
Conte, J.P., Vijalapura, P.K. and Meghella, M. (2003). Consistent Finite-Element Response Sensitivity Analysis, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 129(12): 1380-1393.
8.
Scott, M.H., Franchin, P., Fenves, G.L. and Filippou, F.C. (2003). Response Sensitivity for Nonlinear Beam-Column Elements, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(9): 1281-1288.
9.
Haukaas, T. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). Parameter Sensitivity and Importance Measures in Nonlinear Finite Element Reliability Analysis, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 131(10): 1013-1026.
10.
Hou, J.W. and Sheen, J. (1987). Optimal Cure Cycle Design of a Resin-Fiber Composite Laminate, Final Report for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Report No.: NASA CR 181067, Hampton, Virginia.
11.
Rai, N. and Pitchumani, R. (1997). Optimal Cure Cycles for the Fabrication of Thermosetting-Matrix Composites, Polymer Composites, 18(4): 566-581.
12.
Li, M., Zhu, Q., Geubelle, P.H. and Tucker, C.L. (2001). Optimal Curing for Thermoset Matrix Composites: Thermochemical Consideration, Polymer Composites, 22(1): 118-131.
13.
Li, M. and Tucker, C.L. (2002). Optimal Curing for Thermoset Matrix Composites: Thermochemical and Consolidation Consideration, Polymer Composites , 23(5): 739-757.
14.
Zhu, Q. and Geubelle, P.H. (2002). Dimensional Accuracy of Thermoset Composites: Shape Optimization, Journal of Composite Material, 36(6): 647-672.
15.
Li, H., Foshci, R., Vaziri, R., Fernlund, G. and Poursartip, A. (2002). Probability-Based Modeling of Composites Manufacturing and its Application to Optimal Process Design, Journal of Composite Materials, 36(16); 1967-1991.
16.
Hibbitt, Karlsson , Sorensen, ABAQUS Finite Element Software, ABAQUS Inc., http://www.simula.com, Accessed at (April 2008).
17.
Johnston, A.A. , Vaziri, R. and Poursartip, A. (2001). A Plane Strain Model for Process-Induced Deformation of Laminated Composite Structures, Journal of Composite Materials, 35(16):1435-1469.
18.
Bebamzadeh, A. (2008). Numerical Modeling of Composite Manufacturing: Sensitivity, and Model Errors, PhD thesis in Progress, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
19.
Hubert, P., Vaziri, R. and Poursartip, A. (1999). A Two-Dimensional Flow Model for the Process Simulation of Complex Shape Composite Laminates, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 44(1): 1-26.
20.
Johston, A.A. (1997). An Integrated Model of the Development of Process-Induced Deformation in Autoclave, PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
21.
Reddy, J.N. (1993). Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
22.
Lee, W.I. , Loos, A.C. and Springer, G.S. (1982). Heat of Reaction, Degree of Cure and Viscosity of Hercules, 3501-6 Resin, Journal of Composite Material, 16: 510-520.
23.
Scott, E.P. (1991). Determination of Kinetic Parameters Associated with the Curing of Thermoset Resins Using Dielectric and DSC Data. Composites: Design, Manufacture, and Application, ICCM/VIII, pp. 100-110, Honolulu.
24.
Bogetti, T.A. and Gillespie Jr, J.W. (1992). Processed-induced Stress and Deformation in Thick-section Thermoset Composite Laminate, Journal of Composite Materials, 26(5): 626-660.
25.
Lee, S.N. , Chiu, M.T. and Lin, H.S. (1992). Kinetic Model for the Curing Reaction of a Tetraglycidyl Diamino Diphenyl Methane/Diamino Diphenyl Sulfone (TGDDM/DDS) Epoxy Resin System, Polymer Engineering and Science, 32(15): 1037-1046.
26.
Kenny, J.M. (1992). Integration of Process Models with Control and Optimization of Polymer Composites Fabrication, In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Computer Aided Design in Composite Materials Technology, pp. 530-544.
27.
White, S.R. and Hahn, H.T. (1992). Process Modeling of Composite Materials: Residual Stress Development during Cure, Part I: Model Formulation, Journal of Composite Materials, 26(16): 2402-2422.
28.
White, S.R. and Hahn, H.T. (1992). Process Modeling of Composite Materials: Residual Stress Development during Cure, Part II: Experimental Validation, Journal of Composite Materials, 26(16): 2423-2453.
29.
Hubert, P., Johnston, A., Poursartip, A. and Vaziri, R. (1995). Two-Dimensional Finite Element Processing Model for FRP Composite Components, In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM/10), pp. 149-156.
30.
Cook, R.D., Malkus, D.S. and Plesha M.E. (1989). Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons , New York.
31.
Arafath, A.R.A. (2007). Efficient Numerical Techniques for Predicting Process-Induced Stresses and Deformations in Composite Structures , PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
32.
Albert, C. and Fernlund, G. (2002). Spring-in and Warpage of Angled Composite Laminates , Composites Science and Technology, 62: 1895-1912.
33.
Hohenbichler, M. and Rackwitz, R. (1986). Sensitivity and Importance measures in Structural Reliability, Civil Engineering Systems , 3: 203-209.
34.
Bjerager, P. and Krenk, S. (1989). Parameter Sensitivity in First order Reliability Theory, SCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 15: 1577-1582.
